>>514010941
I never understood the "enemy of my enemy" mentality that a lot of people seem to have with feminism etc.
From my perspective the dudebro types have always been just as bad as the feminists since they are both part of the same system and reinforce each other. The dudebros do the misogynys and the feminists blame men (and thus by extension me) for it. Both sides are my enemy. It's basically socialized losses + privatized gains but in a non-financial context. The dudebros get to live a life of hedonism objectifying women without any sense of shame or social obligation (the privatized gains) then the feminists socialize the burden of shame and guilt onto all men (the socialized losses). The dudebros and the feminists are on the same team because when the feminists redistribute the moral burden onto all men they lessen the moral burden for the dudebros, enabling the dudebros to engage in even more "misogynistic" hedonism. The darwinian forces established by this system causes "misogynists" to rise to the top, hence why autist/nerd/etc types started seeing feminism as retarded and why we often say that women love misogyny/rape/etc. By socializing the moral burden onto all men give a darwinian advantage to misogynistic men, which is pro-misogyny.
It's also why feminist women always attract abusive men. The darwinian consequences of feminism results in misogynistic men dominating their cultural spaces, which means that this is who the feminist women end up dating, which means all their experience comes from abusive men, which then causes them to hate men even more in a vicious cycle. Look at all the high profile streamers in the "breadtube" space and notice how literally all of them are sex pests who treat women like shit. The feminist men treat women like shit, so women feel like they need more feminism and you end up in the vicious cycle.