Thread 514012729

than criminals because the criminals aren't a threat to them while ordinary citizens are. There's a name for it.

They know having a lot of violent criminals keep citizens preoccupied, locked away in their houses away from their neighbors, more angry at niggers instead of (((them))) who are importing the niggers, etc. The criminals can even be a useful tool like Antifa or the threat of "we'll put a migrant hotel next to your school."

But Canadian Truckers or Jan 6 or Brits posting on Facebook or a 12 year old Irish girl protecting herself from Muzzie rapists? That's a 10 year sentence. That gets 10 police assigned to each case. Those defiant little fucks need to be put in their place.

Anyway there's a specific name for this concept but I can't find it.

Anarcho-tyranny?

>>514012729 (OP)
I believe it’s called incel theory if I’m not mistaken.

>>514012729 (OP)
Nigger and spic criminals literally broke into CNN headquarters during the Floyd riots

>>514012729 (OP)
You should also note the fact that the law doesn't prosecute elites for anything. Epstein bullshit is the perfect example

>>514012806

Yeah that's the stuff.

>>514012729 (OP)
Ai sloppa says it's called "conflict theory" or "penal populism", idk:

The theory you are referring to is best explained through conflict theory, which posits that societal elites create and enforce laws in ways that benefit their own interests while disproportionately punishing the less powerful According to this perspective, the ruling class or "power elite"—a small group of wealthy and influential individuals—controls institutions such as government, law, and media, and uses them to maintain their dominance As a result, ordinary citizens, particularly those from marginalized or lower socioeconomic backgrounds, are punished more harshly for crimes, while elites who commit white-collar crimes often face little or no legal consequences

For example, conflict theorists highlight the historical disparity in sentencing between crack cocaine (more commonly used in poor, Black communities) and powder cocaine (more commonly used by wealthy, white individuals), where possession of small amounts of crack carried penalties equivalent to possessing 100 times more powder cocaine This unequal treatment reflects how laws are shaped by those in power to criminalize the behaviors of the underprivileged while leniency is extended to the elite

Additionally, the concept of "penal populism" illustrates how political leaders may exploit public fear of crime to justify harsh punishments for ordinary offenders, often targeting marginalized groups, while ignoring or downplaying crimes committed by the powerful This reinforces social control mechanisms that protect elite interests under the guise of being "tough on crime"

>>514013084
Yes that's it thanks nigga. You have been visited by the Good Boy.

>>514012729 (OP)
Why anarcho-tyranny? Isn't easier to just say "tyranny"? What would anarchy have to do with this?
>>514013173
That's something new. Thanks