Thread 514074158

Get the fuck in here. 10 minutes till launch and we're green.

>>514074158 (OP)
came for explosion

Digits and it blows up mid flight

pizza on mars

Will it go kaboom chat?

Do they have anyone in it or is it just another shitty test launch

Hopefully no scrub. Let's go to Mars bros.

Elon is such a little bitch and all his “creations” are garbage.
Only thing he knows how to do is IDF other peoples ideas

>>514074660
>largest flying object mankind has ever thrown towards God's head
>just another shitty test launch
Kill yourself non-ironically

I love seeing elon fail over and over

>>514074765
Got it, shitty test launch.

>>514074158 (OP)
Stop making these forced disease threads. I know your forcing it.

https://youtu.be/y0-oVKJDjOk

Live stream no gay announcers

>>514074765
Well your shitty test launch seems to have worked anon congratulations

why are bits and pieces flying off from the rocket, it's not just dust

Well, this is boring. Call me if something happens.

>>514074158 (OP)
they want to be on Mars before 2030

LMAO

Elon Musk is a jew.

>>514074158 (OP)
>>514074158 (OP)
buy an ad

epic fail

>>514074474
>t+ 17 mins
Lmao. Fucking useless niggers.

>>514076160
you lost

this is so gay

Pretty cool they were able to launch out the payload

There's already a thread up, please check the catalog before posting.

>>514076452
Payload Deployed - That's what she said

>>514074158 (OP)
>https://www.spacex.com/launches/starship-flight-10
>we are going to space
>we plan for splashdown in indian ocean
yeah, okkkaaaaay

damn, all white

>>514076583
I was not speaking to you filthy jeet hopefully they miscalculate the trajectory and it crashes into your shithole instead of just the ocean

>>514076315
you lost

>>514076758
at least 50% trannies

>>514076925
you lost.

Anti American excellence shills and bots can’t stop losing
You love to see it

Good mission.

>>514074233
The only thing exploding is the Canadian economy moron. Lose the hubris.

>>514074158 (OP)

JEET'D

>>514076854
Then we will thank SpaceX for the tech transfer

Why is it in KM? I thought this was America?

The Mexicunts who tried to block the launch failed. Laugh at them.

WOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS FUCKIN GLOOOOOOWWWWW

>>514077321
Imagine the scam call centers you could build out a destroyed rocket. I imagine you have a lot of fallout style shacks all over for that purpose

I hope it explodes !

>relight worked

ayyyy

>>514076961
you will never be a woman

>>514077494
The wing/finn got burnt? Is this going to fly over my house?

Looks like everything has gone as planned so far, I guess exploding a few rockets was worth it

>>514074158 (OP)
White people trying to go interstellar, black people still chucking spears and hacking each other with machetes.

Why niggers seethe so much at big rocket not exploding?

>>514077738
theyre landing it in your backyard bro all that trash will be real cushy for it

What the fuck are all these colors and movement? Is it leaking some gas or something?

did anyone else see the shot of the control flap after orbit look like it was being electrified or something? it was weird looking and then they changed camera
>>514078087
they probably dumped fuel

>>514078087
Residual gas that wasn't vented.

>>514074765
kek just buy an ad NASA

post yfw the ship misses and instead of splashing in the Indian Ocean, it crashes into India

Well that looked like something exploded

>>514074261
You have a 1 . . . It is a digit, it blows up.

>>514078376
Plasma working on exposed parts of the heat shield.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

One of the wings is burning up, this is going to end up in an explosion

>>514078444
Checked

>>514078087
Liquid hot magma

>>514078759
Pretty good advertisement for Starlink providing live views through the reentry burn.

>>514078846
gayx

>>514078846
Cute and valid

its over

>>514079181
It's still going well. We'll be going to Mars in our lifetimes.

Though that flap has seen better days.

yeah looks totally reusable
would YOU fucking ge t on iit?

Made it through the toasty phase and flexing the flap maneuverability after getting singed.

>looks recoverable
Lol lmao

Time for the flippy floppy.

LMAO

RIGHT ON THE BUOY

>blew the fuck up on contact
kek

a perfect landi-

That flip was really cool. Were going to mars bros

Would

Well you guys wanted an explosion.

thats a successful landing?

all colonists are now dead

>>514080016
Yes. For both Starship and the Super Heavy.

didnt get this screeching with Apollo

would racemix with

>>514080016
Technically yes since they were testing to see if they can bring it down slow enough to catch it with a tower. It exploded after it fell over and hit the ocean sideways since there was no tower to catch it

>Fakeship 10 larp launch
Shit is sooo fake

>>514079429
In about 5-10 years of further development? Absolutely. And id do it for free.

>>514080210
How does one go through life unable to believe their lying eyes?

that was pretty cool. i was not expecting the buoy cam lmao

Waste of precious resources, shut Elon down. Nasa took us to the moon with calculator computers, this clown can't leave orbit.

it blew up when it hit the water and they didnt even mention it lol. i think trump told elon to get his shit together. they want to militarize space.

>>514080451
It was pretty amazing they were able to get it right there at the camera with the damage to the flaps. That was impressive work

>>514080451
Watching it jettison stuff into space was neat. Imagine all the other stuff we can jettison into space.

THE FUCK IS CHINA FEMBOY PUSSY BITCHES GOING TO DO NOW!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

>>514080210
GIGA COPEFROM FLOATING TRASH

So since this tech seems pretty good when can we move on to things that really matter like mecha? I must have a timberwolf

Has it exploded yet?

>>514080906
yes

>>514080553
It’s pretty much the only thing that would make brilliant pebbles v2 that Trump is pitching possible. No surprise it blew up since nothing was there to catch it, but overall an extraordinarily successful test. Hopefully they can repeat this with the block 3

>>514074158 (OP)
What's Thunderfoot's reaction?

I had the feed muted for a while, was there any explanation from the official broadcast what that engine bay explosion at the beginning of reentry was?

>>514080938
Cool

>>514080016
More or less. Looked a little rough.

>see launch news
>open YouTube to see if my wife Clear-chan is streaming
Day is saved

>>514081049
regular swamp gas

>>514081049
No, and you probably shouldn't have expected the broadcast commentators to know that right away. Expect the cause later.

>>514074158 (OP)
If only we had a time machine we could go back and travel to the moon

>>514081522
glad i never gave those clowns a cent

>>514074757
I can tell that picture is fake because of the css yahoo google pixels plus I've seen some fakes in my time.

>>514074158 (OP)
Since Elon's babyboy company SpaceX managed to finally send Starship into semiorbit, we won't see him go haywire on X.

>>514078497
Molten metal slag splattered on the camera housing, thermal shock fractured the glass.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khQDtoqNU00

>>514080160
>would racemix with
this is how we get ants

>>514079971
m2f ?

RECAP of today

>>514080845
>MAD
>CAT

Who gives a fuck, there's barely any atmosphere on Mars so nothing like that will happen there.

>>514076961
>you lost.
tell that more often and you will see what people do who where told that they have nothing to loose anymore.
<50 roubles where just transfered to your bank account>

>>514083126
Mars' median surface temperature is minus 85 degrees Fahrenheit.

>>514083075
>Timber
>Wolf
You surat freebirth scum

>>514084038
>baits (you) into an obvious trap
>still fall for it
MADCAT

>>514084238
Imagine siding with universohomo instead of the honorable genetically superior clanners fighting for their homeland their superior race and their based warrior culture

>>514074158 (OP)
this is off topic. keep this shit off this board

>>514083126
Come for the low gravity, stay for the perchlorates.

>>514081522
>https://old.bitchute.com/video/6FytwS9oQkaE/
Fuck clicked on this just to see a couple of retarded spacelets. These cock sucker should just end their lives and stop stealing oxygen.

>>514080210
Go on Facebook and say that you don't like filthy pakis taking over your country
Protip : you can't lol

>>514083126
>t.still using baseduzslop

Son of a bitch. They did it. Congratulations to the SpaceX team, Gwynne, and Elon. I cheered out loud like I haven’t done since you nailed the Falcon 9 landing for the first time.

>>514085856
it blew up

>>514086208
After touching down with a damaged skirt and ragged flaps with fuel in the middle of ocean, on point next to buoy. It blew up.

>>514074158 (OP)
IS SCHMELON VISITING US AGAIN TO LARP AS A 4TARDLER???

>>514085856
damn thats based. i guess its only 2 more weeks till mars!

>>514083801
You forget how cold it actually is since it looks like a desert.

>>514086448
A successful deflagration.

another elon fail
embarrassing

>>514085856
Greatest engineering feat in human history.

>>514074158 (OP)
New CGI yay!

>>514087064
It looks like an island somewhere in Canada because that's where they film the footage before applying filters

>>514079876
Pretty amazing given at least one control surface was all fucked up.

>>514087913
You do realize you can go watch the rocket launch, yes?

>>514087118
A rapid scheduled disassembly!

>>514081522
>https://old.bitchute.com/video/6FytwS9oQkaE/
good video

Space...

>>514088496
See, it's fun!

>>514077494
>still cant figure the wing problem
yeah they are not going to mars by 2030

>>514090660
>>514090763
>this
space is fake and gay
nukes are fake and gay
these niggers need to stop worshiping kikes

>>514082885
what part of it blew up exactly? it looks like the entire on the camera's right was firing weird but it's not a part of the visible damage

>>514077795
lmao humans will never go interstellar. the radiation between stars will kill you very fast. the sun creates kind of a shield around it that keeps that radiation away. go beyond that area(if you ever get there alive because distance) and you are dead.

>>514090660
Thats the curvature of the firmament.

>>514089161
fuxsakes.

>>514086448
10 more launches ( with my tax dollars ) and it will not blow up
LETS GOOOOOOOO

>>514091395
If we go interstellar, we won't be humans in a biological sense anymore. It'll be as the digitized legacy of humanity.

But we're probably going to all die on this rock, because we're too stupid.

>>514074158 (OP)
>new cracker barrel logo
epic starship launch

>>514090833
>it's fun!

>>514091596
>it will not blow up

>>514092150
did you made this in blender?

>>514092273
Gmod. I'd bet my life on it.

>>514074158 (OP)
If this had failed you'd all be blaming Indians
In reality, Indian brains are behind most of America's successes

hope that thing crashes into a synagogue

>>514074158 (OP)
Fake.
Gay.

>>514092273
>>514092381
have a (you)

>>514092631
>have a (you)

>>514074158 (OP)
Space is a joke nowadays. Astronauts/Cosmonauts do the same experiments that they did in the 70s, nothing new. They also spend a lot of money riding vacuum cleaner and show tricks that have nothing to do with the space. They caught multiple times that they perform their space tricks in front of green screen and at some kind of warehouse and not in space. At this point I really do not believe that space as we are told exits at all

>>514092392
It blew up you dumb Indian rapist

>>514091395
We actually have no idea on how strong the radiation is outside of the heliosphere, it's not confirmed if either of the Voyager probes have left it yet.

Elon, no matter how much you pay to have this horseshit shoveled here, we still aren't swallowing.

Grow up before you die of old age.

>>514092392
Absolutely Werner Von Braun was a week known Indian.
I fucking hate you. You lying sack of shit.

>>514088461
retards don't think that deep about it

>>514092688
>At this point I really do not believe that space as we are told exits at all
Almost as if the sun, moon, and stars were placed in the firmament after plants were made, huh?
Ever wonder why they have to spend trillions of dollars just to get nerds to believe the first chapter of the Bible is false?

>>514093148
He'll probably be streaming himself cheating at video games when he's 90.

>>514093363
No.
He'll die in some Robin Williams-esque masturbation accident.
What do you think, My Little Pony robo-wife electrocutes him while he is trying to make a robo-human hybrid offspring while wearing a gimp suit?

>>514075896
Well you see anon that means it working. Though shits and giggles aside. I believe the idea was to stress test it as hard as they could when it came to things like heat resistance. So bits were gonna come off.

>>514093702
Well, I suppose if we're talking about his inability to grow up, I guess a bizarre manchild gooning accident is likely as well.

>>514093363
>Worlds first trillionaire goons himself to death
Will be a hilarious Headline some day..... Given Musk is currently worth 425bil if Starlink gets spun off and goes Public he'll probably hit Trillionaire almost instantly.

>>514093725
>>514075896
Most of the bits and pieces are Ice flaking off which is common for almost all rockets, though between the Engine skirt and parts of one of the rudders there was some debris

Can someone explain to me how this rocket is supposed to be immediately reusable?

>>514093930
This one was meant to test off-nominal situations, that's why they gimped it. Don't think this specific launch was meant to be reusable.
Major success overall.

>>514093930
Magick.

>>514093930
This one isn't obviously, the family of rockets is intended to be since the idea is that they catch them with the chopsticks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVNIoQUcFI4
I think the idea is that they have 2 towers one for each section.

>>514093930
When they're not deliberately configuring it "wrong" to simulate tile loss, component damage and broadsiding the thing into the wind and executing aggressive maneuvers and slamming the fins out at max power during maxq to test the platform's limits, it's going to run a much safer more laid back entry profile. It'll do what it does out off the coast of Australia, only infront of the launch tower, get caught by the arms, then be lowered near the ground for a visual inspection before being restacked on a booster, having propellant loaded and being sent on another trip to orbit.

>>514094125
>gimped it
You guys are gonna meme this in your spare time.
>>514093702
How will you keep him from finding out and firing you all?

>>514076011
Not your fault you share a name and likeness to Yagoda.
I would file an appeal

>>514094160
Sounds like a heap of lies

>>514094390
If this doesn't go anywhere in 10 years I'll make sure to make a thread so you can tell me you told me so.

>>514094448
Despite my jokes, I'm not that down on SpaceX, however:

Mars by 2020.

>>514094448
It’s already been 10 years and this thing cant even get into orbit. Didn’t the usa get to the moon in 10 years?

>>514094643
I don't care on the when but i do hope we stay ahead of China.

>>514094662
Starships first flight was in April 2023,

Why dont they prove this hunk of junk can take a payload to orbit? every single flight has been suborbital

>>514074233
Get fucked chink.

>>514094774
The program has been going much longer than tat you liar

>>514094662
>It’s already been 10 years
You count years weird. Starhopper was only 6 years ago and the first full stack test only happened 2 and a half years ago. There was zero physical development happening on the starship platform prior to starhopper in 2019.

Damn my thread is still up? The launch was hours ago bros.

>>514074158 (OP)
>5 hours ago
WELL

>>514094827
Oh okay 6 years and it still cant get into orbit.

>>514082885
amazed it landed. but it just looked like insulation blowing around, curious what caused that. but still the best launch so far. time to land on the tower

>>514094923
We can go with 6 if you really want. I'll make a thread in another 4 so you can tell me you told me so :^)

>>514094970
Thought it was from the re-lighting of that engine.

>>514092392
H1B indians literally cant work at space x due to ITAR regulations.

>>514095057
And the Pentagon can't run their networks with Huawei network devices.

>>514094923
the one today could've gone into orbit, it passed the toughest challenges they'd just need to keep the engines lit another 20-30 seconds or so and bam, orbital speed.

>>514095013
It may have been. You can see sheetmetal swaying below the edge of the skirt after relight but there's a long period at the end of coast phase where they're in the dark and you can't see the rear flaps. All I know for sure is after scrubbing through the footage they were both intact after hot staging and dummy satellite deployment, and showed up blown out after the ship passed back into the sunlight prior to the skirt blowing up (due to methane leak buildup?) during early reentry.

>>514094863
You hire professionals, they finish the job.

>>514095134
So why didnt they?

>>514095201
Wow, so this system which is entirely dependent on rapid reusability to get to the moon or mars once again shows it is not rapidly reusable.

>>514095234
Because it's a test platform that they configure in a way that's bordering on unsafe in order to stress test the platform in a bunch of ways. 10 seconds shy of orbital speed means it falls back to earth uncontrolled in the middle of the indian ocean. If it hits orbital speeds and control is lost somehow there's no telling where it might end up deorbiting. There's no reason to run the engines those extra few seconds yet so they don't, and the risk profile is massively reduced as a result.
>>514095302
>being deliberately obtuse about a test article
cope

>>514085856
nice picture

Pretty sure we've got one more launch of Version 2 of Starship before moving onto Version 3, Version 3 has a few notable improvements namely in a more confirmed tile layout and the Raptor 3 engine (Each engine weighs 1 ton less than the Raptor 2s and puts out an extra 50 tons of force).
Musk mentioned a version 4 of starship today which will have more engines than Version 3, not sure if it'll come with a Raptor 4 engine or not.

>>514095401
How much do they pay you to do this? Don’t tell me you do it for free….

>>514095730
oh a Raptor 4 is planned, not sure on most of the specifics but Musk said that they were working on getting ISP to 380s from the current 350s by the end of Raptor 3 and if not then for the Raptor 4s.

>>514095853
>streetshitter immediately starts asking about pay
shoo shoo stinky

>>514095854
>>514095986
Two IDs wont stop shilling faggot musk.

>>514074158 (OP)
When will Elon place astronauts in it to murder?

>>514074158 (OP)
Did it blow up yet?

>>514096080
Lmao

>>514096024
Thunderfoot was laughing about how they wont show the camera inside of the rocket because anything inside would be boiled alive. The walls were probably glowing red

>>514076758
Where are all the jeets? I specifically remember Elon saying that we needed to import gorillions of them because there was not enough talent in America, yet here is his A-team, and not a street-shitter in sight...

>>514096213
you mean like the camera that showed them releasing the dummy satellites?

>>514074158 (OP)
>itt jewish shills pretending the earth is a spinning ball and nasa cgi is real

>>514095302
because the hard/dangerous part is the takeoff and the landing. these are test/development flights. they would also have to apply for a different license from the FAA.

>>514090660
draw a line over the top image to show the direction you expect it to go

>>514096431
>ching chong bing bing bing I eat dog and cannot see

>>514096502
Oh yeah im sure that insulation wont affect their payload.

>>514096394
They never show the inside when it’s descending through the atmosphere. Why not?

>>514094795
It’s guaranteed to deorbit. They haven’t been able to reliably restart the engines until now. If it were in orbit, it could stay up there and have an uncontrolled reentry, maybe over a populated area. It can orbit. Just give it time.

>>514094795
They prove orbit every time but why would they put it into orbit on a test? It could get stuck up there

>>514077723
>>514083793
you lost

>>514074158 (OP)
Fully successful flight. Redemption for Block 2 Starship. Well done SpaceX.

>>514100444
During the ejection of the simulated satellites they exit wonky. This is because the attitude of the starship is not completely under control.

>>514074158 (OP)
Assblasting!

It's too heavy to reach orbit or carry any real cargo.

Should have been cancelled long ago.

>>514095302
>Wow, so this system which is entirely dependent on rapid reusability to get to the moon or mars once again shows it is not rapidly reusable.

It's built to Tesla standards so of course it falls apart

>>514096783

(total theory follows)
I think they are allowing it to burn though in the places where they are testing tiles. Because they don't want the tanks to burn through they are removing tiles in the front section.

If you look at the ss10 landing, notice the heat tiles are smeared with gold / rust. I think that actually is rust. I think steel was vaporizing on the surface from their test locations, oxidizing in the atmosphere and being deposited on the tiles. I don't think they show the interior because the glowing spots and burning holes would freak the fuck out of people.

>>514100649
Yeah a couple clipped the door but they did exit the ship. It was the first time they've been able to use their satellite dispenser in space so there were bound to be some hiccups. The fact it worked to get them out at all is positive. As for what is causing the problem, who can say really. It might be attitude control like you say, could be something about the dispenser mechanism or even the dummy load they were using. Whatever it is will no doubt be improved upon in future flights. They pushed the ship hard and got a lot of good data from this run.

>>514101099
>Whatever it is will no doubt be improved upon in future flights

until they run out of money for this ridiculous piece of shit

>>514101226
Y u mad?

>>514101263
>Y u mad?

it doesnt work mate. it can barely lift itself let alone any significant cargo to orbit.

>>514101364
It just worked mate.

>>514074158 (OP)
>In 1963 Gagarin goes to 327 km altitude and orbits the Earth in a manned spacecraft.
>In 2025 Elon sends an unmanned spaceship at half that altitude.
>Normies think history is being written
What a joke

>>514094827
His point still stands
When Kennedy announced "we're going to the Moon" America couldn't send a man into space. 8 years later, Apollo 11.
>Starhopper was only 6 years ago
First Apollo was 1967 and 2 years later they "landed on the Moon".
Also
>Starhopper
Kek

>>514100996
The Starship re-enters belly first with the airflow travelling to the dorsal side. Meaning that any debris would be pushed towards the back rather than to the belly. The aft flaps were getting rather toasty but the debris from that wouldn't flow against the wind (I assume). The heat tiles have to absorb a lot of heat during re-entry and the ship was cooking on the way down so those might be glowing red hot. Might also be from that cloud they passed through on the way down maybe.

>>514101382
>It just worked mate.

it didnt reach orbit mate because it can't. Also it was visibly falling apart. How is that reuseable?

>>514102265
just watched it.
seemed to work well.
no idea what you were watching.

>>514102265
It didn't reach orbit because if it was to malfunction in flight while in orbit it would be stuck up there until it eventually comes back down who knows where. They actually take extra propellant into space to simulate the mass of a payload so they absolutely could just burn the engines longer until they circularise their orbit. The fact that the ship can sustain major damage to its control surfaces and still land intact on target speaks highly of its resilience and build quality. For reusability there is talk of using a different kind of heatshield that should potentially be easier to send back out again at short notice. That one uses cryogenic fuel to cool the skin of the ship and provide a barrier against the plasma of re-entry. It will probably blow up a couple of times before they get it right.

>>514102572
>just watched it.
>seemed to work well.

you do realise it didnt reach orbit and was carrying virtually nothing, also chunks were falling off it? are you low IQ?

>>514102630
>It didn't reach orbit

because it can't. that's why.

>>514102630
>They actually take extra propellant into space

because they have to because it's too heavy.

>>514102898
It was carrying 4 dummy satellites and the dispenser rig which managed to deploy them. The point of the test wasn't to see how many satellites they could get into orbit, it was simply to show they can launch satellites at all which they can apparently do (with some tweaks).

>>514103000
>It was carrying 4 dummy satellites

Oh gee, a whole 4 lol.

>>514102211
>The Starship re-enters belly first with the airflow travelling to the dorsal side

That's a good point.

Do amerimutts really celebrate this expensive firework which can't even achieve orbit? And people still think america went to the moon.
HAHAHA

>>514102898
it did what they intended it to do.
so when do you launch yours?
hope the stream quality is good.

>>514091373
Looks like a bit of the engine skirt blew up for some reason.

>>514094970
I didn't expect this to affect the landing. Starship has landed after worse.

>>514103283
>Do amerimutts really celebrate this expensive firework which can't even achieve orbit?

it's a useless piece of shit as you correctly point out

>>514103361
>it did what they intended it to do.

what is the point of launching a huge rocket that cant reach orbit or carry any significant cargo? please explain.

>>514094662
Since everything this flight was a success, they'll most likely be testing orbital insertion next flight. They were hesitant to do it because if something goes wrong after the rocket is orbital, it'll be harder to get back down since it'll just keep going around the planet instead of splashing down in the Indian ocean. And after Starship successfully goes orbital, they can technically start using it to launch V3 Starlink satellites.

>>514103582
testing.
so how much can your ship haul?
what fuel are you using?

>>514103582
They will at some point have to test out orbital refuelling which will require them to both reach orbit and carry significant payload there. Will also mean at least 2 ships in orbit at once.

>>514103000
It was 8, actually. 2 stacks of 4.

>>514103842
My mistake. Thanks.

>>514103725
>splashing down in the Indian ocean
They use the Indian Ocean because of all the trash and poo that floats there. It makes for a softer landing.

>>514103759
>They will at some point have to test out orbital refuelling

They'll never do that, it's not possible for this joke of a 'spacecraft'.

>>514103735
>so how much can your ship haul?
>what fuel are you using?

I don't think I claimed to be building space ships, did I? Are you mentally ill?

>>514103725
>they'll most likely be testing orbital insertion next flight.

impossible. it can't reach orbit no matter what.

>>514104056
wait so are you even involved in any way with building them?

>>514104101
>wait so are you even involved in any way with building them?

no. why would i need to be?

>>514104091
Why? Are you just trolling, or is this something you actually believe?

>>514104159
>Why? Are you just trolling, or is this something you actually believe?

it's just fact.

>>514104187
>>514104091
>>514104159
They've already proven it can reach orbit like 5 times now...

>>514104152
>why would i need to be?
to have any sort of credibility to what you are implying about starship.
why would anyone care what you're saying about it?
i thought you were some sort of expert.
seems you're just a random tosser speaking shit.

>>514104301
>i thought you were some sort of expert.

did you? you're even more retarded than i thought then. you don't need to be an 'expert' to see what a piece of shit this is. Wake me up when it reaches orbit with a significant payload which will be never.

>>514104265
>They've already proven it can reach orbit like 5 times now...

it's never once reached orbit.

>>514104582
Why specifically can't it reach orbit?

>>514104582
sorry but your opinion means nothing.

>>514104633
>Why specifically can't it reach orbit?

it's too heavy and too underpowered.

>>514104672
>sorry but your opinion means nothing.

as does yours.

>>514104687
It's the biggest and most powerful rocket ever constructed. Why can't it?

>>514104726
>It's the biggest and most powerful rocket ever constructed. Why can't it?

because it's too heavy and too underpowered. what don't you understand?

>>514075027
Thanks, anon! You are totally not gay.

>>514104784
It has the engine power of 12 Falcon 9s.

>>514101812
>His point still stands
Nah. Gemini 1 was in 1964 and Apollo landed on the moon 5 years later. And this was with the full force of Nasa behind the project when Nasa was funded at a level an order of magnitude more than it is funded today. Spacex, despite what people will try to argue, does not benefit from being a wholly govt controlled quasimilitary entity. Nor were Gemini and Apollo subject to a fraction the bureaucratic red tape and ecological handwringing Spacex is today. It took us 7 years to get to the moon when the project was massively funded and state sponsored. Give these guys a break, they're trying to keep luddite faggots at bay with one hand and accomplish an engineering feat with almost exclusively private funding with the other.
>Starhopper
Starhopper was an initial prototype not unlike the first iterations of the Titan I from 1955, 7 years before the first Gemini mission which used its child the Titan II.

>>514104885
>It has the engine power of 12 Falcon 9s.

It's not as simple as that assuming this isnt just another lie which it almost certainly is.

>>514104994
>accomplish an engineering feat with almost exclusively private funding with the other.

actually they are using taxpayers money for this firework show

>>514104710
oh my opinion means jackshit as i am not involved with the project.
just like yours.
the difference is i'm not implying things i know nothing about.
you are.

>>514105484
>the difference is i'm not implying things i know nothing about.
>you are.

you're swallowing Elon's dong like a good little boy.

>>514104994
>Falcon 1 was a two-stage small-lift launch vehicle that was operated from 2006 to 2009[5] by SpaceX, an American aerospace manufacturer.
20 years my dude. What did NASA have in 1949 ? Let's see
>NASA was founded in 1958
Kek

>>514105546
insults.
really.
i take it you will be withdrawing then as thats all you have left.
see you back here for the next launch.

>>514105601
falcon 1 is a kerolox workhorse basically exclusively for LEO work unless you're sending tiny cubesats to GTO or GEO. What does that have to do with starship again?

>>514104610
Its reached orbital trajectory and performed an orbital burn. Its proved it can reach orbit like 5 times. They didn't put it in orbit because it would be chink tier to leave a test article the size of a building in orbit. You have to be retarded to not understand this. Seriously did you pass basic education in your country?

>>514105822
>insults.
>really.
>i take it you will be withdrawing then as thats all you have left.
>see you back here for the next launch.

10 launches and this is the best they can do with this taxpayer funded shit heap. Surely you should be asking some questions by now.

>>514106108
>Its reached orbital trajectory and performed an orbital burn.

it did not reach orbit. it has never reached orbit. fact.

>>514106108
>Its proved it can reach orbit like 5 times.

no it hasnt.

>>514106183
>taxpayer funded
>he doesn't know how contracts are structured
figures

>>514106331
>>taxpayer funded
>>he doesn't know how contracts are structured
>figures

has it or has it not been handed billions in US taxpayers money for this project? Yes or no.

>>514105855
Idk if you're stupid or something
>NASA is founded in 1958
>Their first project was Explorer 1 satellite on Juno rocket
>It weighed 14 kilos (the satellite)
>10 years later Moon landing
SpaceX
>1n 2006 it has a 200 kg payload
>20 years later they are still testing

>>514106384
As if we needed more confirmation you have no idea how contracts are structured. No they haven't lmao. And before you go off halfcocked, there is a difference between contracts and subsidies as well.

>>514106464
>As if we needed more confirmation you have no idea how contracts are structured. No they haven't lmao. And before you go off halfcocked, there is a difference between contracts and subsidies as well.

has it or has it not been handed billions in US taxpayers money for this project? Yes or no.

>>514106502
>spazzes because he gets the answer he didn't want to see
No. I said it in my previous post. Read it again.

>>514106434
That's reductive. They also launch several Falcon 9 rockets per week in parallel with Starship development. They also have a crewed capsule, which ended NASA's dependency on Roscosmos.

10 hour old thread is still up... Not sure if bad or good
>>514106384
Go ahead and post the handouts I am sure its public

>>514106530
>No. I said it in my previous post. Read it again.

You're just lying. Everyone knows they've been given billions.

>>514106567
>Go ahead and post the handouts I am sure its public

Go watch Thunderfoot.

>>514106183
we'll just have to wait for you to do better.
get on with it.

>>514106540
And they still can't leave LEO

>>514082885
power of ketamine?

>>514074158 (OP)
Toasting epic bread

>>514106209
>>514106227
You must be brown if you don't understand this. Do you understand how orbital mechanics work?

>>514106587
Nope. They sure haven't. Go find me evidence that they've received a single cent to this day for the starship program. The best you're going to get it headlines about winning contracts related to Artemis, but as I mentioned in my previous posts those are contracts which have specific conditions that must be achieved for payout. Conditions which have not been met for a multitude of reasons, mostly related to Nasa not knowing what the fuck they're doing with the program. See: the SLS and tower funding fiasco and the orion capsule heatshield shitshow that they STILL are withholding info on for some reason almost 3 years later.

>>514106632
>we'll just have to wait for you to do better.

this is retard logic. i dont have to do something myself to criticise something.

>>514106727
>You must be brown if you don't understand this. Do you understand how orbital mechanics work?

Again, it has never reached orbit and never will.

>>514106772
>Nope. They sure haven't. Go find me evidence that they've received a single cent to this day for the starship program.

Go watch thunderfoot.

>>514101412
>>In 1963 Gagarin goes to 327 km altitude and orbits the Earth in a manned spacecraft.
>>In 2025 Elon sends an unmanned spaceship at half that altitude.
>>Normies think history is being written
>What a joke
indeed

>>514106831
thunderc0pe can't prove it either because they haven't been paid a cent yet. I choose to believe he knows this and just lies for clicks because that's far less embarrassing than thinking that someone who's actually worked in a lab could be so ignorant to reality.

>>514106906
>thunderc0pe can't prove it either because they haven't been paid a cent yet.

he did prove it.

>>514106960
Post your citation then big guy

>>514106634
That's not true. SpaceX has Falcon Heavy for missions past LEO. It can launch things to the Moon (Lunar Gateway parts), and has launched probes past the Moon (Psyche, Europa Clipper).

>>514106977
>Post your citation then big guy

watch the vid. he only ever cites facts.

>>514107062
I accept your concession phil

>>514106999
>That's not true. SpaceX has Falcon Heavy for missions past LEO. It can launch things to the Moon (Lunar Gateway parts),

when did it launch those?

>>514106999
That's been done by everybody all the time, sending probes and telescopes.
No manned missions beyond LEO

>>514106634
Dart and CLPS missions were launched on Falcons...
>>514106540
II shouldn't be surprised that the Russian is the one that actually knows spaceflight. Now please if you guys could leap ahead of China it would be great, there is no reason we should be competing with people who are using RD-120 copies instead of the people who developed the RD-120

>>514107083
>I accept your concession phil

who am i gong to believe, thunderfoot or you? tough one.

>>514107105
How many men (women, trans) were on those Falcons

>>514106634
>And they still can't leave LEO
>>514107097
>That's been done by everybody all the time, sending probes and telescopes.

>>514106632
>get on with it.
with what?
futile belief that "WE'RE GOING TUH MARRRRS" is going to achieve jack shit?

>>514107109
Thundercuck has been repeatedly proven wrong since the falcon 1 lol he is about as credible as that Somalian mayor in Minnesota

>>514107180
Less than the amount your country produces. Temu greece

>>514107186
Not at all
I'm not saying the space is fake or something like that
>Elon has been testing for 20 years and then he'll just put men on the rocket and off you go
That sounds like 20 more years of testing
>>514107289
So zero.

>>514107109
It's time to put the shovel down, you don't need to keep digging.

>>514107097
>No manned missions beyond LEO
Literally no one has done this except for NASA. If I'm not mistaken, a person hasn't been sent past LEO since Apollo 17.

>>514107180
To my knowledge, there are no transgender astronauts out there. If there are, and one was sent to the ISS on a Dragon 2 capsule, I'm sure I would have heard of it since I frequent /sfg/. So 0.

>>514107196
The largest flying object humanity has ever made just proved it can go to orbit, deliver payload in space and return back safely to a controlled landing and you think that isn't going to achieve anything? lmao

>>514107360
isn't that the number of your countrymen that have been to space XD

>>514107406
>If I'm not mistaken, a person hasn't been sent past LEO since Apollo 17.
Yes, that's the point kek. Put on your thinking hat
>>514107521
Yes but you have no argument here.
I accept your concession

>>514107430
what the fuck is it going to achieve, retard? other than benchmarks that only fags care about
>her de her we gonna go tuh MARS
>we gonna colonize MARS with more niggerball!!
fuckin what, dude?

>>514107360
Oh, wait, where you asking how many people SpaceX have sent to space in total? In this case, the answer is 72 (I didn't bother to check if some of those were the same person sent up multiple times). The flights were either to the ISS or just around the planet.

>>514107627
>Yes, that's the point kek
What is your point exactly.

>>514107627
You said "b-but they've never been out of LEO" then I gave a few examples of how they have had missions out of LEO and then you moved goalposts saying "b-but they haven't with people" as if they didn't have the capabilities to do so. You are just butthurt because SpaceX is outperforming all of Europe in spaceflight and you can't handle the feeling of inferiority.

>>514074158 (OP)
You are never ever leaving this enclosed plane alive you retarded golems. CGI is all you get in this life, which is more than you deserve anyway.

>>514107708
Russians do that all the time since the 60s. How is Musk gonna go to the Moon ? You act as if some history is being written when in fact Musk is trying to catch up with 60 yo Soviet tech

>514107799
See >>514107627

>>514107243
>Thundercuck has been repeatedly proven wrong

state a fact he has been wrong about.

>>514107430
>The largest flying object humanity has ever made just proved it can go to orbit,

it did not reach orbit. if and when it does, we can say it is proven.

>>514107799
You're arguing with a timewasting flat earther whose entire modus operandi is to lie and be a dishonest faggot. He's well known in these types of threads.

>>514107836
>Russians do that all the time since the 60s. How is Musk gonna go to the Moon ?
SpaceX has been on the Moon as much as Russia. They sent up 2 lunar landers this January.
>You act as if some history is being written when in fact Musk is trying to catch up with 60 yo Soviet tech
Maybe not for this flight, but the first booster catch were definitely historic, and I'm glad that I got to see them live. The next goals for Starship are orbital insertion and upper stage catch.

>>514107380
>It's time to put the shovel down, you don't need to keep digging.

I'm not digging mate. Thunderfoot has a PhD. He knows what he's talking about.

>>514108049
>SpaceX has been on the Moon as much as Russia.
Yes, 60y later, catching up
Did he send nuclear powered rovers though

we will never do anything remotely noteworthy with Mars
wouldn't it be cool if these niggers devoted some the same time and money into some earthly endeavor?
i guess there's spaceniggers stranded on Mars that Musk is desperate to bring to earth

>>514108192
>we will never do anything remotely noteworthy with Mars

No human will ever land on Mars.

>>514108228
>No human will ever land on Mars.
very doubtful, but even if they did, so fuckin what?

>>514108161
>Yes, 60y later, catching up
Musk wasn't alive until 1971, and didn't found SpaceX until 2002, so yes, they had to "play catch-up". But I would argue that SpaceX is currently at the top of the spaceflight industry, since they launch more flights and total payload than the rest of humanity combined (several times over), and they are the only ones who have the rocket vertical landing technology.

>>514108010
My bad I haven't been in space threads on /pol/ since the space elevator days.

>>514106789
you seem to be criticising something you don't understand.