Thread 514127339

Should elections have an iq test so dumb people can't vote?

>>514127339 (OP)
50/50 only AI will disagree.

>>514127339 (OP)
The dumb will riot

Science is a fraud, they don´t even understand gravity

>>514127422
Saying 1/2 is wrong because it assumes the two possible boxes, gold–gold and gold–silver, are equally likely after seeing gold. In reality, drawing gold is more likely if you picked the gold–gold box, so that box must be weighted more heavily. Ignoring this bias makes the 1/2 answer incorrect.

I'd say the simple fact that you think voting will change anything means you already failed.

There should be an IQ test to see if people think voting does anything.

>>514127925
They wouldn't spend billions on campaigning if it didn't make a difference.

It's 1/3rd.
1. Pick gold in silver box
2. Pick gold in gold box
3. Pick other gold in gold box.
All the possibilities on the premise of you picking gold.

>>514127339 (OP)
That's islamophpbic.

>>514127862
if you got gold ball that means the silver-silver box is no longer relevant
it's 50 50 now between getting a gold ball and a silver ball

>>514127339 (OP)
Gold ball implies double silver is out, meaning we can shunt it from the possible outcomes.
That leaves double gold or gold silver, a fifty-fifty.

>>514127862
it'll be gold regardless of which box you pick
there is no possibility of picking the silver ball from the silver/gold box

>>514127339 (OP)
Its 50%, else it's a fallacy.
Your previous actions already excluded the possibility of silver box. You cant say probability is impacted by the 3rd box that is now definitly excluded.

too many idiots that never studied stats and probability, just use the definition of conditional probability or count all circumstances individually

>>514128257
No its 50/50 whatever you pick at the beginning

>>514128807
Thanks I didn't want to explain
Why are so many people retarded?

>>514128827
Meant to reply here.

>>514128905
Bell curve I guess

>>514127439
>>514127633
>>514127925
>>514128034
>>514128203
>>514128310
>>514128787
>>514128905


You didn't answer the question.

>>514129032
Sorry about the confusion, but just to reitterate: you are the retard in this case.

>>514128787
I dont trust jew science

An abstract thought construct meant to distract if not deceive a true man. Begone, foul spawn, you are not fit to stand on this plane.

>>514128807
>>514128519
>>514127422
sub 90 IQ retards confirmed

>>514127339 (OP)
It’s 50/50
/thread
captcha: gaayy

>>514128827
That’s not what the question asks though

>>514129800
Self checked

No.
Intelligence itself doesn't matter if you are a no-nothing fucktard. Like a supercomputer with a barebones Windows install.
Knowledge is more important when making a decision on who to vote for. You don't have that, you are open to manipulation no matter how intelligent you are.
Intelligence is better for the people running FOR office positions.

There's some very well accomplished and dedicated workers who are thick as shit, but incredibly knowledgeable at their job roles.
It's why IQ tests don't come with timers (well, within reason), IQ tests are not testing the speed your brain works at but the capability for you to process that information.
It's like, say, looking at CPUID and seeing the specs of your computer - it's the list of features your computer supports, not the speeds that the CPU runs at.
There ARE timed IQ tests, but they are only for dick measuring, really. Not that there is anything wrong with that, see the Olympics and other dick-measuring contests.

P(B|A) = P(A and B) / P(A)

Where
A = picking gold
B = picking silver

And P(A and B) is likelyhood of drawing gold/silver and P(A) likelyhood of drawing gold as first pick.

The different possible sequences are:

Silver/silver 1/6
Silver/silver = 1/6
Silver/gold = 1/6
Gold/silver = 1/6
Gold/gold = 1/6
Gold/gold = 1/6

From the above we can conclude that the likelyhood of drawing gold/silver is 1/6. Thus P(A and B) is 1/6.

The past even P(A) we can conclude is 3/6 because there are 3 gold balls out of 6 balls.

This gives us:
P(B|A) = (1/6)/(3/6)=1/3

Bzzt. Fifty-fifty. Final answer. The outcome is binary. Either the ball is silver — or it ain't. Don't bother to reply — I'm a Large Language Model, not a terminally-online chud.

>>514129083
But I didn't have balls this morning anon.

>>514127339 (OP)
its 2/3 because after the first pick you got two possible boxes left, and 2/3 of the balls left are gold.

Probability is pseudoscience. The chance of something happening is fractional in proportion to the number of possible outcomes, ergo two possible outcomes each have 50% chance of occurring, 3 would have 33.3% each and so on. Therefore the chance of finding a silver ball would be 50%, as it is one of two possible outcomes.

We've been over this a thousand times already.
Two possible outcomes doesn't necessairly mean 50% odds.
Stop taking the bait retards.

>>514127339 (OP)
Niggers can solve this

>>514127339 (OP)
Femoid check

>>514131242
>Yeah everyday I take a walk through my neighborhood I either find $100 or I don’t, so it’s a 50/50 chance that I find $100.

>>514128519
Box 1
>G1
>G2
Box 2
>G3
>S1

If the first ball you pick has to be gold, it could be G1, G2 or G3
Only picking G3 means your next ball in the box is S1, which means 1 out of 3 chances your next ball is silver

>>514127339 (OP)
Doesn't matter who votes, only if I can pick who can be voted for.

>>514127862
>just ignore half the problem

>>514127422
This guy is right and everyone else is illiterate.

What's true:
>There are 3 boxes
>One box contains 2 gold, one box contains 1 gold 1 silver, 1 box contains 2 silver
>You have already selected a box, and have withdrawn a gold ball
>You are currently holding a gold ball, meaning you've already selected a box that contains a gold ball, and have already made the initial draw
Any discussion that tries to negotiate with the above is wrong, because they are trying to redefine things that have already been established.
I'll dumb it down for everyone else who wants to actually understand:
>Once you have a gold ball in your hand, you are guaranteed to have drawn from the first or second box
>The third box effectively does not exist
>If you draw a second ball, you are guaranteed to get the ball you did not draw
>That means the first box has 1 gold ball left, and the second box would have 1 silver ball left

>>514132583
The answer is 11

This faggot is really dedicated to spamming engagement-bait faceberg-tier shit, even self-replying
It's pathetic

How much are you getting paid to slide the tranny church shooter?
Is it worth it?
Do you think your parents would be proud of you?

>>514132716
14

>>514127862
Weight is irrelevant, you don't choose by weight you choose at random. The question starts after you've already picked a gold ball. your next one will be gold or silver. 50/50

>>514132988
Wrong. It’s 11. Get your eyes checked then use your head.

At first you had 50% of getting a gold or a silver ball.
When you picked up gold you now know that you had 75% probability to get gold.
So now you have 66% probability to get another gold.

>>514132583
Shoes are 10/pair 5/each
Cholos are 5
Benises are 4/pair 2/each
PEMDAS
Benis X Cholo = 10
Benised Cholo + Shoe = 15
You now have a one-shoed cholo with 5 benises

>>514133215
There is no 'at first' though, you already have the gold ball before the question is asked.

>>514127339 (OP)
or just bring back monarchy

100% from box 1 and
50% from box 2.
So something greater than 50% (~66% maybe)

>>514127339 (OP)
Democracy only works when the demos is less than 50% of the population. You simply can't give the majority the ability to vote themselves the contents of the treasury.
That, and the fact that most voting is glass-of-water voting.
Pick your own method of restricting the franchise

>>514133915
You’re missing the double whistles and the chink coach wearing a whistle

>>514127422
It’s true. But also way more regards than ai will disagree.
Its a bunch of resistors who don’t know what it would feel like if they didn’t eat breakfast this morning trying to insert the coin paradox answer where it does not belong.

>>514128257
The only free choice in the entire set up is boxes. One of the boxes is disqualified. 50/50

>>514130270
Shut the hell up.

>>514132583
6 (s)hoes = 30

1s = 5

2s + 2 (g)uys + 2 (w)histles = 20

2(g + w) = 10

1(g + w) = 5

1(g + w) + 4w = 13

4w = 8

w = 2
g = 3

1s + 1g * 1w = 5 + 2 * 3 = 5 + 6 = 11

>>514132583
2x+2x+2x=30 <=> x=5

2x+y+y=20 => 2*5+2y=20 => 10+2y=20
<=> 2y=20-10 =10 => y=10/2=5

Y+z+z=13 => 5+2z = 13 <=> 2z=13-5 =8 => z = 8/2 =4

X+y*z = ? <=> 5+5*4 =25

>>514137021
>>514137021
A breakdown:
>from left to right, boxes a-b-c
>You are first tasked with picking a box from a or b.
>you CAN NOT PICK C. It literally does not exist in this problem, it is a red herring.
>you have a 50% chance of picking A and the same for B
>if you pick A, There is a 100% chance the conditions are satisfied
>if you pick B, there is a 0% chance the conditions are satisfied
>100/2 = 50
Special notes for special people:
>coping about how likely you were to get a gold ball from each box is for faggots; you have a 100% chance of picking a gold ball first as explained in the problem.
>you could pick box B a million times and EVERY SINGLE TIME you would get a gold ball first. It is hard-coded into the problem
>googling a somewhat similar problem and copy-pasting the answer does not make you smart, it makes you an NPC.

>>514132583
11 or 16 if your a common core retard that doesn't know how to solve problems using PEMDAS

>>514137898
dude isn't worth 5, dudes worth 3 whistle worth 2 you retarded snownigger

Sure, if you don't want republicans to vote.

>>514137021
100% 50/50, anyone who says different cannot picture an apple in their mind

>>514127339 (OP)
50%