Thread 514129024

Should economics teachers teach all the economic theories and let the students decide for themselves which one they agree with? Or should they just keep teaching neoclassical or Austrian and pretend the rest don't exist?

>>514129024 (OP)
Where's distributionism?

>>514129024 (OP)
another

Economics is a dead 'science' (actually a social science)
the post-1970s global economy is Financialized, owned and run by central banks. Speculative debt instruments create all the world's wealth
No economic theories of any name/category/'schools' have any relevance whatsoever. At all

Learn what money is, how it is created
That's it, that's all

The Money Deluge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6m49vNjEGs

97% Owned — How is money created
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcGh1Dex4Yo

>>514129024 (OP)
Most curriculum already touches on different schools in intro, and any good program has focused higher level ones no? Or you can go to a program with professors with a certain lean. Fact is, broad exposure is valuable from an academic perspective but not a vocational one.

>>514129771
>socialism
>international

Pick one?

>>514129861
It's weird that my macro curriculum prepared me to understand and anticipate central bank behavior, whereas most retards here are still completely mystified by the absolute basics. You also seem to think that market principles are inapplicable to most goods and services because central banks exist? Dumb.

>>514129024 (OP)
just 1 post by this id???? hmmmmm, nvm. :/