Thread 514135235

umm, Im thinking based?

>>514135235 (OP)
He just repackages and tones down shit Nick Fuentes said 2+ years ago. His daddy was a fed and he was doing boomer 6 oclock news since 2005.

"based". Dumb fucking zoomer. You dont know shit.

>>514135235 (OP)
he's a pro jewish pedophile a thread died for this spam

They had bread

>>514135459
feduentes is not relevant, and your boy was shilling for Laura Loomer two years ago so shut the fuck up

>>514135844
>Used to have bread and circuses and gay shit
>Now we don't have the bread and they made the circuses into gay shit

Uh, you know what's better than this too? The original form of limited democracy we had. Women can't vote, and only select competent white men can.

Why don't they ever advocate going back to a system that worked?

>>514135235 (OP)
>the medieval village is unthinkable without its lord. so much of its endless round of toil went to cultivate his crops, white its rents, court, fines, and all other charges with the curious archaic names went to supply his personal wants and the needs of this monastic or baronial household. yet at the same time the village enjoyed a high degree of autonomy, regulating its own cultivation, settling its own quarrels, and living its life with little interference.
>the legal division of the villagers into free and unfree had genuine meaning but went much less deep than the words imply. the unfree villeins had to work for the lord and pay many fees that the free tenants escaped yet the division into prosperous and poor was more meaningful. looking at the men of the middle ages we can ask "in social life is there any more elusive notion then the free will of a small man?"

>>514135459
fpbp.

I like Tucker, i even endorsed him for President in 2024. BUT the truth is Fuentes is 12 steps ahead.

>muh fed

They're both feds.

There's factions in the US government that want all the low IQ brown hordes deported and want to actually install some sort of quasi-NatSoc government because it's the best way to meet the Chinese problem.

They are the minority though. Global liberalists by far make up the majority of the government establishment.

>>514136278
You would not have been one of those competent white men. You'd be a pig farmer too drunk off moonshine and too busy talking your daughter to even know what a vote was.

>>514135235 (OP)
Don't worry, we're getting Techno-Feudalism!

love to see this tucker faggot win a sword fight. he'd be a turnip picking peasant in the field. toothless and pale.

>>514140012
Not an argument

>>514135459
but...thats what he is supposed to do.

the way it is supposed to work is a mass-appeal figure says what the radicals say, but in a way that is more palatable for that audience. Eventually, those listeners graduate from 'babbys first dissident', and climb up the ideological chain, and eventually to those radicals.

Tucker, of all people is actually doing some of that(perhaps without knowing). His name recognition and charisma brings in people, and he brings on people who were once on friggin millenniyule who say what the 'wignats' say but in normie-speak. people who listen to tucker eventually find jared taylor n the like, and go beyond.

fuentes is supposed to do that but doesnt at all. he attacks both those less and more radical than him(he is nice to literal enemies though), and just wants everyone to remain on the groyper ranch giving him superchats to call other people gay. he is a movement cancer, and probably working for federal interests to destabilize a dissident movement.

>>514135980
Seethe

>>514135235 (OP)
Reality matters

>>514135235 (OP)
If he is not an open National (racial) Socialist, then, he is a liberal. Conservatards and libtards are both of the classical liberal paradigm, and they are both enemies.