Thread 514185302

"You can indict a ham sandwich" is a very known say regarding grand juries, prosecutor have the opportunity, unchallenged, to present their evidence, on their term, under their narrative to a grand jury and only need simple majority to ensure an indictment. Ergo "You can indict a ham sandwich".

So its extremely TELLING of how incompetent a prosecutor or how bullshit a case is when they fail to secure one.

This is the Trump Administration in a nutshell

and is a patter now

Just curious, what's your first language?

>>514185302 (OP)
Isn't that assault?

>>514185302 (OP)
Yea it's called nullification. Pig getting hit by a ham sandwich isn't a crime IMO, it's hilarious.

>>514185302 (OP)

He still got fired so its a win!

>>514185479
>Yea it's called nullification
That not Jury Nullification nigga.

>>514185379
German

>>514185433
By the letter of the law, it is.

Which make it even more funny they could not secure an indictment

>>514185671
What a lawless land.

>>514185612
It's effectively nullification.

>>514185723
there is a difference between "The Letter of the Law" and "the Spirit of the law"

Huell memes commence!

>>514185766
Jury Nullification is for TRIAL when the Jury acknowledges the incident but refuses to give a "Guilty" verdict. and.

For a Grand Jury you dont need a "Guilty", you just need "We believe there is enough evidence for case". The bar is sooo low that failing to meet it is nothing short of "Shame on you, shame on your family, shame on your cow" cause you dont even need the whole panel to agree, just majority.

>>514185612
>jury does not follow the law when someone clearly broke the law
>t-that's not jury nullification
It is. Please stop being retarded.

>>514185770
Read Chinese legalist philosophy. Law is law and nothing is above the law. From kings to peasants, all are worthless before the law.

>>514185948
Guess what faggot, the grand jury made sure he's defacto not guilty without wasting taxpayer money, that's effectively nullification any way you slice it. You want to nitpick about technical shit, you can go eat shit off a indian street with a spoon and wash it down with a glass full of Ganges.

>>514186008
>>514186057

Nigga, this is prosecutor being retarded, they overplayed their hand and it blew back on them.

There is "Simple Assault" and "Aggravated Assault"

Simple Assault is a misdemeanor, there was physical contact but nothing serious.

Aggravated Assault is a Felony Physical contact, likely with a deadly weapons, intention to cause sever bodily injury.

They could have charged him Simple Assault, get him 10 days in jail and a fine

Instead prosecution tried to "Make an example" out of him, Charged with AGGRAVATED ASSAULT.

They could not convince a grand Jury that throwing a sandwich was a "Deadly Weapon" or that it was meant to "Cause severe bodily injury"

this is why the case blew on them, not cause the gran jury was being defiant, Prosecution was just THAT incompetent.

>>514185302 (OP)
Just shows that most of the people in DC deserve to be carjacked, raped and tortured by cartels rather than be saved from it. Communists and criminals are natural allies, often one and the same.

>>514185302 (OP)
>lawfag
what if i told you that dc grand juries are all niggers and kikes?

>>514186342
by who?? There is soo much Crime in DC that The national guard is busy Picking up Trash.

Here are your Tax Dollar at use. Please Clap

Creating laws should be as simple as "don't steal shit or murder" but unfortunately we're controlled by insidious fucking kikes and their goylems on leashes that want to create trillions of charges that you can often find a common man crushed under but none of them when it actually matters, and strictly because they have a shitload of retards out there convinced they're operating as intended.
>picrel

>>514185948
>Jury Nullification is for TRIAL
this is grand jury nullification retard.

>>514186717
REad nigga, READ! >>514186313
This is not Nullification, this is "Prosecution fuck up a simple Grand Jury"

>>514186645
>Pic related
Probably Destroyed or at Mar a Lago,
no way those files were in a "Field Office" and no one has leaked them

>>514185302 (OP)
Damn, next he's gonna sue to get his job back with back pay.

>>514185302 (OP)
>is a very known say
Saar

>>514186967
I highly doubt he want his job back under the current circumstances

>>514186478
Damn, went from 3 murders a week to the niggers being so scared to do anything that all that's left to do is pick up trash. It's almost like DC is a white city again. Almost.

Really amazing how quickly you can quasi-civilize savages when you show them the one thing they can actually understand.

>>514186313
>There is "Simple Assault" and "Aggravated Assault"
Here is the charging document.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/08/13/us/sandwich-complaint.html
Here is the code section.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/111

Please note the statute does not go into whatever drivel you think is the law. He was charged with the broadest portion of the statue possible. There was no overplaying. Juries can and are often fucking retarded. All the DoJ is going to do is pick another, and another until they get what they want. I implore you to stop being retarded.

>>514187745
>All the DoJ is going to do is pick another, and another until they get what they want. I implore you to stop being retarded.
Oh man the leftoids are gonna be so fucking mad, they were gloating over this SO HARD on twitter. The one tiny insignificant win they thought they had.

>>514185766
No, there was no indictment. Jury nullification doesn't exist without a jury trial.

>>514186057
The chinks are wrong about a lot of things.

>>514185302 (OP)
>You can indict a ham sandwich" is a very known say regarding grand juries,
Kek

>>514185302 (OP)
OK so just indict the sandwich then, no need to drag the poor guy into this