Thread 514189245

Can /pol/ give me ONE (1) good reason why consensual sex with children should be illegal without resorting to feminist talking points?

>>514189245 (OP)

Same question, but slaughtering every jew alive?

You are possibly /pol/'s weirdest regular and I don't mean that in a good way.

>>514189245 (OP)
stupid question

would you like to have sex with someone like you in your childhood? touch your old nipples, suck your old anus..

>>514189636
without resorting to feminist talking points?

children can't provide informed consent

>>514189245 (OP)
Having sex with children is nasty. Women should fuck teenage boys though. The boys are more than old enough and most likely still the dominant one in the relationship.

>>514189245 (OP)
children cannot consent, if you have the werewithall to consent to sex then you should be able to sign contracts...why do you want kids signing contracts faggot? you just want weak victims who cant or wont fight back so you can feel less like he girl sissy bitch. i dont dare, legal or not, you die faggot. suck it.

look anon, as cute as they are, you need to realise that just because you CAN slowly groom them into doing what you want them to do, doesnt mean you should. what results is rape trauma victims, faggots ( such as yourself ) and suicides. Seriously how could you rape something so cute?

>b...but they enjoy it!!!
So you want to groom them and trick them into enjoying heinous acts for your own pleasure and profit

>>514189245 (OP)
If they come on to you its ok, but even then probably have to consider if its actually going to be any good socially and emotionally for them. I say this as a degen, its probably not so keep it as a fantasy.

Because God says so.

can jannies actual enforce the no spam rule?