Thread 514217872

Somebody clue me in on this shit, please. Regarding forced diversity in the workplace. Based on the anti-woke backlash (and it appears to be growing), how is having a high ESG score appealing to a company's bottom line ($$$)? Do they engage in DEI knowing it will inevitably be at a loss? Or is this part of a nefarious long game? Am genuinely curious.

As I suspected

>>514217872 (OP)
>Do they engage in DEI knowing it will inevitably be at a loss?
NO
> Or is this part of a nefarious long game?
Yes the goal is to destroy white population and make the whole population of white countries brown.
>the Kalergi plan
So they just print money , open borders and flood white countries with millions of niggers and browns.

>this goes all the way up
>to euro globohomo kings
>and the Vatican jesuits
>of course, all of them are pissed at Trump and him closing the borders
>and stopping Vatican NGOs from flooding country with lowest iq niggers and browns

>>514221313
Bumping your thread, anon.

Fuuuck

>>514217872 (OP)
>Be Larry Fink CEO of largest asset manager in the world
>Tell all banks that they cannot give loans to anyone who does not follow your guidelines (provide a point based system to determine who is following the rules or not and spend tens of millions each year grading every individual and company on the planet in a separate system from FICO score) call it ESG
>Game Developer/Producer/etc tries to make entertainment product that contains no niggers. ESG score plummets and now they can't get loans. Loans are how large companies pay payroll until product is released and cash flow comes in.
>Company goes bankrupt unless it does what Larry Fink wants

And he became the world's largest asset ass when he was put in charge of the '08 recession. He both caused it and received all the relief, and now he uses it for this gay shit