>>514700276
>Again, sounds like a bunch of cope that you can't prove and you just magicially pulled out of your ass.
We cannot trust medieval sources, they must come last in a chain of evidence starting with stratigraphy, archeology, art & tech and general typology.
Christian power rose slowly. The idea that during the 8th century, Europeans by and large, cared for a jewish god, some holy book from the east is asinine.
When can we really see from artifacts, art etc a broad acceptance of christianity? This took until after the high medieval period. Christian chroniclers aren't just biased, their point of writing was to wage war with reality. All over Europe, living Paganism was preserved for mysterious reasons. Whether Celtic myth, Nordic runes, it all pops up many centuries after being declared dead.
Ironically, mass appeal came with the printing press and bible translations, something the holy see was vehemently against. This is a highly modern phenomenon, losing the narrative through being popular. This is when the monopoly on the narrative was lost, but it helped usher in christian Europe proper - and with it, endless wars.
>Which is why Christianity has protected and united European countries multiple times against mongols, commies, kikes and other browns.
This sounds nice, but again, you are living in a different reality.
Europe was never united under a cross. Quite the contrary. And worse, parts only united themselves under the greatest of duress and pressure from outside. A racial belief is what's needed. It's also what we need now.
>Then what your idols?
Paganism traditionally tries to use wood. If you use metal, your try for ancient alloys over modern ones preferably.
