>>514700976
the issue you have is you think because he didn't explicitly make this statement in a single line that he didn't say it
which is lazy thinking
intellectuals don't tend to make sweeping statements like that
they give diagnostic critiques where the overarching context IS the statement, and this has been especially true for intellectuals, particularly philosophical and political commentators since the enlightnment period in the west
so, no, he didn't explicitly state that in a single easily digestible line
but that was his overall message
which my quotes prove
the problem is you're lazy, you don't want to have to work to understand something
you've got tiktokmong zoomerbrain where if something isn't in short form its not worth it
and thats why you're getting bodied
you can't keep up with me
not my intellect, not my pace, not my energy
>your whole βnatural evolutionβ angle is a modern reinterpretation
yet you can't show me the supposed original and intended interpretation with quotes like I can show you quotes that complement my alleged modern interpretation
you're using the same line of logic that anti-gun mongs in the US use
>hurrrr the founding fathers never imagined people would invent 1000 rpm assault rifles so the constitution doesn't apply anymore
because I can already read the subtext of your argument