Thread 514704085

To all the anti indian campaign threads on /pol/ i would like to say that your hatred is being mislead, by racist nazis

Low education and completely gullible to whatever they are told by their feed/friends

I come across people like this daily, most are not bad people, they are just incredibly easy to influence because they rarely engage any critical thinking and just parrot what the rest of their peers are saying (or gbn)

You find they are really sheltered to actual political discussion and only take in single sources

Problem is there are an awful lot of these types now and like the US, enough to put the wrong people in power

Normally there is something in their personal life that is making them deeply unhappy, and now they have an easy outlet for their anger

I know hard line "tommey" followers, I know women just like this one, they all have a shit life as they see it (or previous trauma) and need to find someone else to blame

Then there are the other group, the ones that rock up because they don't want immigrants stealing their benefits

I've found a direct correlation with people that sponge off the state (or rip off the taxman via self employment ) being the ones who are most anti immigrant, as they see immigrants as direct competition to their own scamming

If they weren't dancing to the tune of the right wing by protesting hotels, the same media would be calling them chavs and spongers and attacking them

Sorry Mukesh. I'll still hate the jewish bioweapon.

>Frank W. Notestein was the first director of the United Nations Population Division, serving from 1946 to 1948.

>In 1955, Notestein advised India's Minister of Health on population policies and was instrumental in initiating a population center for training and research on demography in India.

>>514704085 (OP)
I dont need any help with hating you stinky jeets. It comes naturally.

>>514704085 (OP)
I just don't think you understand how disgusting you are to normal people, we're not being mislead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw4Ie7LQuno

>>514704085 (OP)
>your hatred is being mislead, by racist nazis
Not "nazis".
Chinks.

80% of the time, it's a chink shill.

People are just waking up to the biological reality of your "race" (species) that's been hidden from them for so long. Reminder: Pajeets are and have always been regarded as less than subhuman by all cultures and peoples throughout history, but people seem to have forgotten and don't read what the wise men of old wrote (also pajeets=gypsies, picrel)

>The Indians in general are of excessive cowardice and are unfit for war. They lack manly spirit
Megasthenes (active c. 302–288 BC) — Indica (now lost; preserved in Strabo, Arrian, Diodorus)

>The Indians are naturally disposed to lying and boastfulness
>They are servile and effeminate… lacking in courage
>They are all impostors and quacks
Strabo (c. 64 BC – 24 AD) — Geography, Book 15

>Indians are most effeminate of all nations… they adorn themselves like women and fear death above all things
Curtius Rufus (active c. 40–50 AD) — Histories of Alexander the Great, Book 9

>Indians are arrogant and foolish, easily humiliated
Alexander Romance / Pseudo-Callisthenes (earliest version c. 3rd century AD)

>Indians are more like wild animals than men
>Indians go about naked all the time
>Their food is raw vegetables, and they eat the bark of trees
Arrian (c. 86–160 AD) — Anabasis of Alexander, Book 6

>They have no conscience about what they do. If a man lies with a woman and be found out, they do but laugh at it. In fact, they are the most lewd and wicked people that exist. The people are the most brutish and bloodthirsty in existence; for they kill and eat any stranger that falls into their hands. The people are black and ill-favored, and live in a most beastly manner. They are the dirtiest and most brutish people that exist in the world. They eat in the most disgusting fashion, without any table or cloth, and put the food directly into their mouths with their hands all covered in filth. They go about naked, only covering their loins with a cloth, and account it no shame to expose their persons. Even the women wear nothing but a single cloth, and go barefoot and bareheaded. They worship idols of the most abominable kind, covered in grease, filth, and blood. Their temples are full of uncleanness, and the priests themselves are the filthiest of all, daubed with ashes and cow dung. [The people] have no regard for cleanliness. Their houses are built with no regard to order, and they live among pigs and dogs and all manner of unclean beasts. The people are black, ill-favored, and of disgusting aspect. Their hair is coarse and oily, and they never wash it.
Marco Polo (c. 1292 AD)

>The harbor of Pegu is decently sized. Indian dervishes live there, and precious rocks are mined nearby. The Chinese section of the harbor is very great in size. They sell porcelain there at a cheap price. Wives will sleep with their husbands during day and at night they go to visit strangers to sleep with them. They will even pay the stranger money for the service, and will bring the stranger sweet food and wine, they fed and ply them with drinks as they love foreign merchants as they are white while people of their own country are very dark. If a man’s wife becomes pregnant from a foreign merchant, her husband will pay him money. They look at the child once it is born, and if the child is white the merchant is paid three hundred tenek, but if the child is dark then the merchant is paid nothing, while what he drank and ate is considered to be a gift in their customs.
Afanasy Nikitin — A Journey Beyond the Three Seas (1466–1472)

>Indian are ‘indolent’ and ‘vile’ by their very nature
French account (1500s)

>Indians have “stupidity and low cunning,” inherently backward
Jemima Kindersley (1760s)

>Hindu customs are "abominable and revolting," Hindus are cannibals, their habits are "disgusting" and their food "revolting."
Abbe J.A. Dubois (early 1800s)

>Hindus are “a people exceedingly depraved.” Sanskrit medicine, astronomy, history, and geography are laughable nonsense. Indians are “cowardly, unfeeling and mendacious”
Charles Grant & James Mill (early 1800s)

>the Bengalese are "notoriously licentious" and hill men are "servile, deceptive and cunning, utterly without honour or principle"
Rev. Hobart Caunter (1834)

>Hindus are “inert” and filled with “low cunning,” “superstition” and “fulsome sycophancy.” Their language is “a heap of allegories". Hindu beliefs are “absurd” and “monstrous,” and the entire group is lacking compassion compared to the British
John Bacon (1840)

>>514704085 (OP)
op has all the telltale signs of a waste of time.

>[referring to Indians in a private correspondence] “Look at the dogs, low, treacherous, murderous, tigerous villains.”
>He even endorsed extreme violence, calling for the “extermination” of Indian people and approving the mutilation of “wretched Hindoo”
Charles Dickens (mid 1800s)

>Indians are a “cowardly and slavish people”
Sir Richard Francis Burton (1850s travelogues)

>Indians are “dark-skinned rapists,” “rapacious savages menacing the virtue of Britain”
Blackwood’s Magazine (1850s)

>expressed disgust at the Ganges, stating, "the memory of that sight will always stay by me, but not by request"
Mark Twain (1897)

>Indian train guards and hotels are inadequate, advised that native servants “should be quietly kept in their proper places,” and depicted Indians as “swarming … like insects”
Murray’s, Cook’s travel guides (late 1800s)

>Physically, the Indian is not a wholesome influence because of his incurable repugnance to sanitation and hygiene…. The moral depravity of the Indian is equally damaging to the African, who in his natural state is at least innocent of the worst vices of the East. The Indian is everywhere the despair of the sanitarian, here he is a menace not only to himself, but especially to the natives of the country. The moral depravity of the Indians is equally damaging…. The Indian is the inciter to crime as well as vice,…. The presence of the Indian in this country is inimical to the moral and physical welfare and the economic advancement of the native.
The Indian Annual Register (a 1919 report on Indians in British Kenya)

>"Indians are biologically inferior"...."they can't think backward or forward by more than 15 minutes"
Albert Einstein (1920s)

>"The Indian was incapable of ruling himself." "The British Empire did not conquer India with superior numbers of men, but with superior race." "The English have a faculty for treating peoples as half-monkeys... I don't even see that as entirely unjustified." "The British have taught the Indian how to walk upright. Without the British, these people would still be living in the trees like animals." "India is a place of chaos and weakness.” “They have a long history, but it is a history of decline and stagnation. Their culture is backward, superstitious, and weak.”
Adolf Hitler (1920s-1930s)

>"I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion."
Winston Churchill (1942)

>They [Indians] are superb flatterers. They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That's how they survived 600 years. They suck up...their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.
Henry Kissinger (1971)

>They [Indians] turn me off! They are repulsive and it's easy to be tough with them.
Richard Nixon (1971)


The consensus is nothing short of remarkable, and it proves that you are genetically revolting and it's only natural for all humans to be naturally repulsed by you.

>"The Indian was incapable of ruling himself." "The British Empire did not conquer India with superior numbers of men, but with superior race." "The English have a faculty for treating peoples as half-monkeys... I don't even see that as entirely unjustified." "The British have taught the Indian how to walk upright. Without the British, these people would still be living in the trees like animals." "India is a place of chaos and weakness.” “They have a long history, but it is a history of decline and stagnation. Their culture is backward, superstitious, and weak.”
Adolf Hitler (1920s-1930s)

>"I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion."
Winston Churchill (1942)

>They [Indians] are superb flatterers. They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That's how they survived 600 years. They suck up...their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.
Henry Kissinger (1971)

>They [Indians] turn me off! They are repulsive and it's easy to be tough with them.
Richard Nixon (1971)


The consensus is nothing short of remarkable, and it proves that you are genetically revolting and it's only natural for all humans to be viscerally repulsed by you.

My bias against Indians doesn’t come from shit I read online, it comes from working with them, many of them, for years, in an industry that does lots of outsourcing as well as hires lots of immigrants. They are insufferable.

>>514704967
Hindu Christian alliance

>>514704967
>indian catwalk.webm

>redditspacing
>jeetery
>Not loving white people

>>514704085 (OP)
Actually, I hate indians because as soon as I started passing as a woman I would get more disgusting comments from them than from transphobes. Let's not even get into how woke Indian women refuse to hold their men to the same standards as everyone else. I used to be vehemently anti racist

>>514704085 (OP)
Shut up, jeet. If poos were so amazing and smart, why is the country basically a giant shanty town with a holy river that was turned into the world's largest open sewer?

>>514704157
fpbp /thread

>>514704085 (OP)
Was used by China yo cement the Asian century
BRICS just abounded a world bank
You guys are not the important ones anymore but think this way
The world doesn’t actually hate Indians
It hates white people (uhmmm why wouldn’t they)
They don’t want Indians to push up white societies
They want them to help them conquer them