Thread 514713885

Why do catholic schools allow their teen girls to dress in skimpy short skirts that expose their bare thighs and legs?

Because the priests don't rape the girls.

>>514713885 (OP)
So Catholic teen boys will end up thinking about it, jack to it, feel guilty about committing a mortal sin, go to confession, and get raped by the priest.

>>514714012
Statistically they'd be much more likely to get raped by a public school teacher

>>514713885 (OP)
Its a public service to encourage fertility.

>>514713885 (OP)
there’s a forgotten joy of walking by gardens instead of picking every flower and shoving it down your dickhole

not every flower needs to be plucked anon, some just blow in the wind and that’s fine

>>514713885 (OP)
The primary attendees of private schools are White and they dont expect them to rape each other for showing their ankles
Better question, why do public schools allow their teen girls to wear booty shorts and spandex?

>>514714064
Cope.
Public schools don't have a well-documented history of covering up sex crimes and shuffling offenders off to other schools to abuse other children.
They just get busted.

>>514714064
Gee it's almost as if teaching about the Lord and the world should be done at home under parental supervision instead of letting strange men raise your kids spiritually and educationally

>>514713885 (OP)
Enforcing a strict dress code is of zero importance. And I'm not religious.

>>514714064
Oh just shut the fuck up you faggot

>>514713885 (OP)
Most people are not gay and like girls but you are right it is sus that Christian organizations try to hide their latent gayness.

>>514713885 (OP)
why are you brown and disgusting?
women and children see you and throw up in their mouth

>>514714267
No the Teachers Union has been protecting diddlers and shuffling them around for years

>>514713885 (OP)
>skimpy short skirts that expose their bare thighs and legs
This was considered prude back in the day. While pants off any kind were considered slutty and shameful therefore banned.

But the catholic church clearly didn't considered coomers or pedos mindset when they came up with the dress etiquette, as seen by OP who is a coomer and a pedo

>>514714481
You got proof of that son? Sounds like some bad faith cope to me.
We should also note that there are way more teachers than there are priests. Priests have far higher sex abuse offenses on a per capita basis.
Sorry, but your fake religion doesn't actually make saints.

>>514713885 (OP)
Because Catholics aren't Christians