Thread 514732233

What did epstein victims say can i get a qrd

It’s bad. Trump is finished

it was mostly just telling their stories and saying the files need to be released. trump and bill clinton were namedropped once. epstein was best friends with trump. nothing new. I just hope 2 more republicans sign the petition because otherwise it will fail

>>514732431
fake shit

>>514732714
I believe her

>>514732714
so did the victims say trump did it i can't find any info and there's no threads about what they say for some reason

Why can't the witnesses just list the names?

>>514732913
they didn't say trump raped them. one of the women said that epstein used to brag about being friends with trump a lot

they all said that epstein was well-connected with celebrities and politicians. they didn't name specific people except bill clinton and trump. they also said that they are creating their own list of people that were involved in epstein's sex ring

>>514733369
so did anybody not ask the victims if trump did anything and also why is this so difficult to find right now

>>514733045
they are avoiding of being threatened and sued even more than they already are. you can't just claim that trump is a pedo because he'll sue you like the litigious fag he is.

the point of this is that they want the govt to release the names so they don't have to

two more weeks
In the coming months tap tap
etc.

>>514733488
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wwnXbXRMDs

a reporter did ask about trump. she just said that epstein used to brag about being friends with him a lot and that epstein seemed to like trump the most. that's all she said

>>514732233 (OP)
Call me kike but
What if the Epstein List is fake? What I mean is, yes Epstein made a list of people that he would like to come to his island but he was a big time loser who had nobody come to it at all.
While, we know he DID pimp out girls to various people but the fact remains none of these girls are saying anything. In a #MeToo world nobody involved just says Donald Trump dumped a load in my ass? Or I definitely think Prince William or Bill Clinton did?

Maybe what it is is that there is no Epstein Files list, its never existed, the mistake was that we only imagined they did, it was a rumor, the FBI tried to find them and claimed they would find them and found nothing so it got weird because conservatives wanted them so badly. Its like holy shit there never were any files or proof of pedophilia on elites what the hell are we supposed to do because if we deny it it would get conspiracy theoried on US that WE are covering it up.

Is this crazy to anyone? Sorry but its starting to hit me that this entire thing might have been false from the start and Epstein is a giant loser, socialite, failure who did nothing and was a nobody.

>>514733785
there probably isnt a literal list, but there are a bunch of rich and powerful freaks that raped underage boys and girls, whom will be named soon it seems
>Epstein is a giant loser, socialite, failure who did nothing and was a nobody
yeah, the guy who was ingratiated within jewish intelligence and obscenely rich was a nobody
im sleepy

>>514733785
And again call me a kike but remember that time that 4chan also invented a Russian Hoax Peepee Tapes against Trump, if you weren't savvy enough you might say hey lets find these peepee tapes and then promised to find them, then there were never any peepee tapes and you might have the same embarrassment because the left wing needs those peepee tapes to be real so badly.

Maybe to a certain extent 4chan invented the Epstein Files? I have no idea where this shit even came from all I remember is seeing threads about a bunch of names in a book and people saying see these names it proves everyone in the world is a pedophile. Is that really all of it?

Maybe we are just getting hoaxed by trolls on a gigantic scale.

>>514733637
so i found this

HALLIE JACKSON: I do have to ask, and I know, and it’s just something that I think we’re compelled to at this moment, with the attention on President Trump, with these questions, are at a pardon, did anybody see or hear of the President himself doing anything inappropriate, as it related to Jeffrey Epstein?

GROUP: No.

HALLIE JACKSON: Or former President Clinton?

GROUP: No.

so the victims are saying the same thing maxwell said that trump and clinton didn't rape anybody that they saw

I hope the victims make some outrageous claims, even if false, if only to force them to release everything. Make the truth the lesser of whatever evil they are trying to avoid.

>>514733785
>the fact remains none of these girls are saying anything

A number of the victims have been bound up in legal NDAs as part of past settlements, deals made before Epstein's investigation became public and when they thought that justice was forever out of reach.

The victims are actually threatening to release their own information on Epstein and his clients now if the government doesn't do it for them, specifically because they are tired of waiting. Individually, none of them felt they had any power to be taken seriously. But working together their claims have more weight and while they can't press legal charges on anyone they name they can at least put them in the crosshairs of the public.
This is a double edges sword, because while on paper this is a way to get around attempts to protect pedophiles this could turn into a witch hunt VERY easily. The better option, by far, is for the government to release what they know about Epstein's clients in a way that holds legitimacy, rather than just lashing out which is what will happen if the victims have to do this themselves.

>>514734482
holy shit a sane reply

>>514734482
i just don't get how everyone involved keeps saying trump didn't do anything when it's obvious he did

it seemed to have some truth to it and then they brought out that disgusting kike Gloria Allred at the very end and it lost all credibility as far as i am concerned....she is the queen of bullshit lawsuits as far back as i can remember.

>>514732913
They explicitly denied it
https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/1963261610601959431

>>514732431
What will happen now to daddy Trump?

>>514732431
reads just like the aww shitz masturbation roller coasters

>>514732431
>pushed them away for their “poor” performance

I believe it's completely true, and I still vote for Trump because it is BASED.

>>514733045
Starts with an M, ends with ossad will kill them.

>>514735343
He will fall deeper into dementia and escape justice.

Are the epstein files the new russian collusion conspiracy theory for the q anon far left?

>>514735742
My cock makes homossad?

>>514735999
No, this actually happened.

Nobody believed them, definitely

>>514734482
The problem is nobody will believe any list the govt releases that does not 100% vindicate whatever list they've put together in their own minds over this past decade. It really is that simple, does anyone honestly think Trump would run on releasing a list that would implicate him in child rape after the whole world already forgot about it during Biden's term? We can meme and "hurr durr Drumpf a stoopid" but even then, he's not releasing a list with his name. They got terabytes of supposed cp data and financial transactions. Most likely they are simply incapable of weeding out the legit financial clients and pedos from that mix with any sort of certainty. Not only that but releasing actionable evidence related to, hopefully, ongoing investigations would invalidate it anyways. People need to start looking at this logically instead of letting hype and spectacle take over.

>>514732913
They said he did not
Now the left eats the victims

>>514732233 (OP)
BUY MY BOOK
BUY MY BOOK
BUY MY BOOK
BUY MY BOOK

>>514736533
This is also true, and something I've said myself in past threads. They sort of massively blew it on this, such that almost no version of the list they could possibly release will ever be considered 'real' by everyone. There will always, always, always be some holdouts that will go full JFK assassination conspiracy theory on this for decades to come, theorizing about some powerful person who escaped justice.

The only version of the list that could possibly be released now that people MIGHT believe is one that implicates Trump himself. And I don't say that because I, personally, demand that be true. But rather because that would represent a clear and obvious *failure to cover up*.
If Trump releases the list and Trump isn't on it, then "Trump withheld information to protect himself" is an obvious narrative that arises organically, with "and he protected other people as well, like X person" follows soon after.

But if the Trump administration is forced to release the list and Trump IS on it, then that undercuts conspiracy theories. If Trump wasn't even able to protect himself from scrutiny, the one person he was most motivated to make sure was not touched by this, then the idea that he prioritized sparing some other secret cabal of people rings hollow. Sure, you'll still have SOME people that will claim to believe it, but it won't be anywhere near the levels of mistrust as if Trump isn't on the list.

I believe that these reaction predictions hold true regardless of Trump's actual level of guilt or innocence. Because at this point people are not reacting to the facts of the case, but the appearance of the coverup that Trump has created by his attempts to deny, delay, and dismiss everything Epstein related with seemingly growing desperation.

>>514736446
The "oh fuck. What have I done. What monsters have I enabled?" strut

>>514734930
>I don’t need evidence, just vibes

>>514732431
>Jane Doe

Sounds like a horrible fan fiction from a fag.

>>514734930
about how many more weeks until drumpf is taken down? two?

>>514737443
A list that includes Trump, or Clinton, as a sacrifical lamb is arguably worse. It is admitting that a fake list is okay so long as the important people are on it. It's pulling the wool over our own eyes, quietly aknowledging that the list can be and has been altered but we choose to believe it because we only REALLY care about a handful of big names and not the crime itself. That would be a true perversion of justice.

>>514738143
Thats why I said it had to be Trump himself. Trump giving up another big name, ANY other big name, even a Clinton, would be meaningless. Trump has a long history of throwing other people under the bus for his own gain. Any other big name you could put forward would be seen as exactly what you described: a sacrificial lamb to draw attention.

The ONE person that Trump would never throw under the bus for his own gain is himself. So thats the only person on the list that people are going to care about: if its not there, then people will always believe that he didn't give us all the info. The conspiracy theories will never end. It doesn't matter if its true or not, the *story* of Trump covering up his own involvement is too strong for the public to resist. It'll never go away.

>>514738821
Then it is the people admitting they only want to punish Trump and any other name is collateral. It isn't about the pedo shit, that's just the tag line they clutch their pearls over. The crime becomes second fiddle to the accused when the name becomes required and this whole business could be about murder, tax evasion or jaywalking. If he has to burn, even if he is innocent, for this or nobody else does then nobody deserves justice in this case anyways, and that's not a failing of the justoce department, it is a direct failing of the people and politicians using the victims for political brinkmanship.

>>514739402
False premise. You seem to be assuming that if they release a list of 15 names, and Trump isn't on it, those 15 people never get prosecuted or punished the whole thing just vanishes into the aether.

What I'm saying is that if they release 15 names and Trump isn't on it, those 15 guys still get the book thrown at them. Justice is served to those 15 guys. But a lot of people will forever be whispering about how "We all know thats not the FULL list... Of course he covered his own ass and who knows how many others."

>>514732233 (OP)
Nigger

>>514739864
>You have 15 people on a list, nobody believes Trump wasn't on it and is hiding himself and others.
Vs
>You have a list of 15 names plus Trump, everyone (enough) believes even though without Trump's name they wouldn't believe it was just him left off.
The premise is the same, people don't believe those 15 names are all of them but are willing to look the other way because they "got" Trump. This holds true for countless other names ranging from Kevin Spacey and John Podesta to Colbert and the Obama's. It is absurd to willingly demand that specific people be found guilty of a crime regardless of any evidence for you to believe the case is over. How many uninvolved people that ran afoul of internet schizos have to be included before it is enough? Only Trump because it was released under his tenure? Then again it isn't about the crime it is about the man.

>>514732233 (OP)
Two weeks

Checked

>>514733785
> While, we know he DID pimp out girls to various people

We DON’T know that. Maxwell was convicted on trafficking girls to Epstein alone. While we all believe it, and it’s probably true, we don’t have any factual basis for claiming that Epstein pimped kids out to anyone. I also denounce the Talmud, and hate the antichrist. Christ is king.

>>514735641
Absolutely. Based. Trump '28. You really haven't lived until you've dipped your wick in as many 11 year olds as possible.

>>514735217
agreed this is coming from someone that doesnt like trump as soon as i saw gloria i knew massie was grifting me

>>514734257
timestamp or I call BS