Anonymous
(ID: 7aw2/Pzu)
9/4/2025, 1:27:52 PM
No.514786617
>>514786672
>>514786777
>>514786932
>>514787254
>>514787330
>>514787377
>>514787451
>>514787610
>>514787724
>>514787727
>>514787797
>>514787903
>>514789517
>>514789610
>>514789626
>>514790043
>>514790063
>>514790299
>>514790428
>>514792012
>>514792332
>>514792785
>>514793720
>>514793907
>>514794055
>>514795247
>>514795600
>>514796475
>>514796664
>>514796954
Have you taken the Phantom Time pill yet?
The years 614 to 911 CE never actually happened. Instead, medieval rulers supposedly fabricated those 300 years to legitimize Otto Iβs claim over the Holy Roman Empire. Entire events, entire reigns, even whole generations β all absolute bullshit.
Everything (((they))) have taught us to think we know about early medieval Europe is wrong. Charlemagne? Bullshit. The Carolingian dynasty? Partly fictional.
>But Anon, if that's true then it's actually...
Not 2025β¦ it would actually be 1725, retard.
It's obvious. Look at the mismatches in archaeology, calendar oddities, and gaps in historical records. That 300 year time span has practically no primary evidence or artifacts compared to the 300 years before or after it.
What are the political implications?
The years 614 to 911 CE never actually happened. Instead, medieval rulers supposedly fabricated those 300 years to legitimize Otto Iβs claim over the Holy Roman Empire. Entire events, entire reigns, even whole generations β all absolute bullshit.
Everything (((they))) have taught us to think we know about early medieval Europe is wrong. Charlemagne? Bullshit. The Carolingian dynasty? Partly fictional.
>But Anon, if that's true then it's actually...
Not 2025β¦ it would actually be 1725, retard.
It's obvious. Look at the mismatches in archaeology, calendar oddities, and gaps in historical records. That 300 year time span has practically no primary evidence or artifacts compared to the 300 years before or after it.
What are the political implications?