← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 514824785

6 posts 4 images 5 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: i/B5PdXb) United States No.514824785 >>514824955 >>514825299
*CLACK* *CLACK* *CLACK* *CLACK* *CLACK* *CLACK* *CLACK*
.......
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5/NwnT) United States No.514824934
The figures are way worse than that in reality. China doesn't have 1.4 billion people but maybe 1.2 or even less. And their birth rate is significantly lower than official figures.
Anonymous (ID: cqc6/Cfy) United States No.514824955 >>514825237
>>514824785 (OP)
the japanese did a study measuring things like salt purchases vs average salt consumption, vaccine doses administered, etc and found china has a max population of 900m already
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5/NwnT) United States No.514825237
>>514824955
Chinese hospitals get government money per baby delivered and have been fabricating stats for decades now. African villages do the same thing to get moar gibs. There's a lot less people in both than official numbers say.
Anonymous (ID: LNjYCbY/) No.514825258
two more centuries
Anonymous (ID: gzNovfj8) Canada No.514825299
>>514824785 (OP)
If the west hadn't browned itself it would have been in population decline since the 00s, much like Japan is today. Which isn't even a bad thing. populations are supposed to boom and bust. And the mass importation of 3rd worlders has not actually improved native fertility rates (only did the opposite).
So population copers are the most retarded retards on earth. A country can function with a high quality of life under negative population growth as demonstrated by Japan and South Korea. You COULD flooding the place with Indians, and this would boost the population. But it would make pretty much everything worse, not better.