Thread 514880952

She contributed a lot, like cooking and cleaning the whole time.

what a fat bitch. she can take the fridge, it is hers
i asked a lawyer about this
i have a small business and wanted to put it in my moms name single member llc right when the divorce was going to happen
the juice is not worth the squeeze, is what i was told

>>514880952 (OP)
Scammed hard. Her ex-husband must have worked in a Mumbai call center pretending to work for Microsoft

>>514880952 (OP)
kek nice, stupid fat roastie BTFO

>>514880952 (OP)
hakimi'ed

>>514880952 (OP)
There are few greater pleasures in life than seeing a scheming female in pain and suffering.

are you stupid? do you think courts are stupid? people try to pull this shit all the time. courts can just say "no, this is obviously bullshit, hand over your stuff."

they usually don't do it, but that's because it's usually not fraud. when it obviously is, though, they absolutely will.

the law is not fantasy magic. it works pretty much the way you would expect it to. if you try and play an uno reverse "ackshually its a gift for me mum" they'll just say lolno and send the cops around to kick you out. and they'll just kill you if you resist.

>>514882126
You're a retard. He said the magic words and stuck by it, "gift for mom". Stupid cunt. Fuck off

>>514882126
It may be different in your country, but I know of a guy who pulled this off successfully.

>>514882126
Things are a lot different in abbo-land.
If the deed to his house was always in his mom's name, no one can do anything.
If he did it reactively after the divorce had been announced, theres an argument to be had.

>>514881156
Did you get a divorce?

>>514881897

this should be cut in stone and put above my door

>>514882126

nah flay those jew judge alive
have king
white men have money no one else
deport orc inc mik wop rican
sell feminists to india
is vance our new hitler?

>>514882126
>https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1i1fpgw/reveals_the_truth_achraf_hakimi_my_mother_always/

>https://www.foxnews.com/sports/wife-moroccan-soccer-star-loses-divorce-settlement-fortune-mothers-name

>>514882704

I would burn her for treason for just trying to scam the house from him

>>514882778
yes

cancel alimony and any waelth for wnyone but white men

no one should have a penny in whie kingdoms but white men

irish
italian
rican
boot with rest of orc

jews flayed alive

feminists sold to india

king 100 free room per white man free

>>514885136
Not surprised this worked. If it was officially gifted to his mom they can't touch her money in divorce. The thing is you have to do it properly. Which means the mom has to pay income tax on the gifted money. This makes it official. Paying tax is still a net plus compared to divorce. Good for the lad. He beat them at their own game.

>>514880952 (OP)
lol. Get fucked bitch.

>>514880952 (OP)
kek, bitch didn't do her due diligence when she prepared to rip him off

Do women not cook and clean when they live alone or smth?

>>514882126
here if you buy something as big as a house as a "gift" you need written declaration saying it's a gift, precisely so that in situations like this the gift-giver has no claim to the property
it's completely legal

imagine getting married to one of these dumb bitches. just lmao.
>uhh save the white race by having a family?
no thanks.

>>514881156
What the fuck does that mean
Protect your assets who cares what some kike lawyer said
He wants to fleece you and get his cut

>>514880952 (OP)
I bet she initiated the divorce, 80% of them do.

>>514880952 (OP)
I hate that there;s this trend of guys no protecting their assets through their mothers to protect them from their wives. When their mothers were the same type of whore in their time.

I hate when women stay winning.

>>514887717
We have the same in Germany AND you have to pay taxes on the gift received so there's no way in hell you would be able to get the house back

>>514880952 (OP)
TikTok captions are absolutely retarded.

>>514888130
This. Anything I already had (cars, house, etc.) is in my Dad's name. He got divorce raped and I didn't want the same thing to happen to me.

>>514880952 (OP)
Obviously it's not fair. If she's not working because she's supposed to be at home taking care of the house, then she's entitled to half. Why would a woman choose to get married if you force her to leave her job, but you can just leave her with nothing in the end?

>>514881156
Yeah m8 listen to someone who makes a living by lying and manipulating

I knew a guy whose wife had a significant sum from an insurance settlement. When they married, she said
>This money is never to be touched, it is our future, and it's there for kid's college and our retirement only
She used it as collateral in effect.
>You pay for this stuff now, and I've got our future covered
So he paid for the house, for the cars, for everything. And no shit she read the book "Sex at Dawn" that was being heavily promoted by notorious jewish faggot Dan Savage, and decided that monogamy was a crime against human nature.
So she cheated on him and when he found out she divorced him and took the house that he'd paid for. Got the kid, got everything.
And so she tricked him into paying for all of it while holding some huge sum of money back from him - from their SHARED finances - and he wound up getting none of it back. And obviously he can't partake in the giant nest-egg that she withheld during their marriage.
It makes me insane to think about.

>>514885136
Would this work in america?

>>514881156
Get a lawyer that's on your side, not looking out for others. And I doubt it's a kike lawyer, they are loyal to their client, which is the duty of a lawyer.

>>514882126
If mom owns it and he doesn't own it, the court cannot seize it from him. Even a female judge who hates men cannot break that.

Well played. Given her reaction here I have no sympathy at all for her. Cook and clean, a maid could have been hired much cheaper than what she was trying to get.

>>514887973
Surrogacy, nigger

>>514885046
>is a faggot who literally created multiple new jeets the savior of the white race
gee I don't know anon. it's a mystery.

>>514880952 (OP)
I did this as well before.I got married my house 401K.Bank account are all in my brother's name Which my brother is disabled and I am his legal guardian. So I control all of it anyways.

>>514881156
>she can take the fridge, it is hers
kek

>>514882769
I think it would be the same anywhere. Can't get blood out of a stone. The guy doesn't own it, the mother is not in court, the court has no way to get it.

>>514885046
You're complaining about the judge? Judge did the right thing, not that he/she had any choice. The house was not available to be seized. Someone else owned it.

>>514881897
>There are few greater pleasures in life than seeing a scheming female in pain and suffering.
yes.

>>514885510
Whether mom pays tax is between you and the IRS, at least in the US. The title is transferred, the court sees mom's name on the title not his, that's it.

Could even transfer it right back after the divorce, probably. Although I don't know if the divorce judge would retain jurisdiction and might swoop in to seize it then. If you're still before that judge, say if there are children and the judge is managing child support, then you'd better not transfer it back.

He didn't win because the judge took his side. He won because the judge had no way to make her win.

>>514888752
this, the mom will have to pay taxes when receiving the house and then you'll have to pay 60% taxes when you inherit it

>>514881156
What? What are you even saying?

>>514887717
In the US I think you can just transfer it as a quitclaim deed, or sell it for $1. That's fairly common. No need to explain yourself. You go to court, show you don't own the house because you are not on the title anymore, that's it.

>>514882126
>Just hand over someone elses house
It isn't his house you retard

>>514889873
Or had he bought the house before they got married.
She would have no right to it. Unless he was a dumbass ass and put her on the mortgage as well.
The best thing to do, if you know you're headed for divorce is quit your job and become a bum. That way you can get alimony off of her.

>>514880952 (OP)
>heartless scheme to fuck over people you claim to care about backfires
>go online to claim this is somehow still unfair to you
Islam was right about women

>>514889229
Was she living under that roof too? Was his income paying the heat, the electricity, and even buying the food and cleaning supplies for her cooking and cleaning?

And how long taking care of the house would entitle her to half? 10 years? Mortgages can be 30 years or more, and working a job is a lot more work than maintaining one house, and the guy probably maintained it, she was just cook/maid.

>>514880952 (OP)
This happens a lot and people very rarely get away with it. If a judge so much as catches a whiff of an attempt to hide assets or somehow shield them, the judge is going to look at it very unfavorably. Then, the husband will write a twenty page r*ddit post about how everything is so unfair without even mentioning the fact that he tried to hide assets. Then, you'll slurp it all up.

>>514889703
He should have killed her that's on him for being a door matt

The courts will probably force it sold and it split between the guys mother and his wife I would bet

>>514890666
Shut up, nothing beats a legal document that says your stuff isn't yours
Unironically this has been invented by kikes to protect their assets but then non-kikes picked up on it and kikes are now seething

>>514889703
He trusted a woman. Learn from his mistake.

>>514890666
What? No he is saying the title is in his Moms name. There is nothing to "get away with" you moron. A judge can't force his Mom to sell her property lmao.

>>514890761
How would they do that? His mother can say "no, fuck off". It's hers

>>514890666
there's nothing to "hide" if it's always been in his mother's name

>>514880952 (OP)
>sorry fat bitch

You just know she’s going to balloon up even more

>>514889703
If they split all the assets in the divorce, why was her money not also split?
This sounds like he was raped because of the kid, everything goes with the custodial spouse for the benefit of the kid. That's a much harder case than OP.

But even so, if he had the house in his mother's name, she would not be able to get it. The court would want it for the mother and the kid, but it could not touch it. It would be owned by someone who isn't in court, the mother.

>>514889996
Well played.

>>514880952 (OP)
What would be fair is putting her into stocking and publically shaming her allowing people to spit on her, throw eggs and vegetables at her, smear shit onto her, etc. while she is stuck there with her head and hands bound in a public square for a month for divorcing her husband.

>>514890665
>working a job is a lot more work than maintaining one house
There's no real way to measure that. If she was using her time to maintain that house, then she's entitled to half. If you wanted to keep his money and house, he could have just hired a maid like you said.

>>514890563
You might be right, I've heard things like that. Maybe you're a lawyer in the relevant area and know what you are talking about. But it's less obvious to me, because if that house is in any way touchable by the court, owned by someone who is before the court, I would expect a family court judge to try to transfer it to the female.

The benefit of giving it to a family member is that the judge has no way to touch it at all.

>>514890666
The judge will look at it unfavorably and be angry and give the guy a lecture in court. Then the judge will not give her the house or do much of anything to him, because he cannot.

Of course the judge is mad when you defeat her. But you still want to defeat the judge.

>>514882126
The trick to this (in most US states) is that you have to have to be able to defeat the other side's accusation that you were doing it specifically to shield assets from their client. You absolutely can put assets in a trust, give them to a family member, tons of strategies to shield them, even specifically for the purpose of shielding them. What you can't do is have a status quo of implied joint owners ship and then transfer those assets to a shielding vehicle when you expect, or are about to initiate a divorce.

>>514890761
Nope. The mother is not before the court. The court can't order her to do anything.

>>514881156
My old boss started pulling 1000's of dollars out of his business accounts for "gambling" before he got divorced because he was "depressed". Idk if this would work nowdays.

>>514881897
If you could distill this and inject it into veins I would be slamming that drug nonstop every day multiple times per day. I'd get an IV hooked up and have it be drip fed to me while constantly yelling at the nurse to up the dose because I'm flatlining.

>>514880952 (OP)
I've already seen what modern women consider "cooking" and "cleaning" so yes, it is fair.

>>514891184
OK you're entitled to that opinion. Our legal system in the US, your flag also, doesn't care much about what's right, so we have no reason to argue.

>>514880952 (OP)
>I contributed my fair share
>cleaning cooking

yeah.. nahh

>>514888752
We have better mechanisms, I don't remember the exact details but it's something like
>form a trust to which you are the beneficiary
>form a corporation, the trust owns the shares
>the corporation receives your assets and all future income
Done correctly, it allows you to benefite from all income and assets without actually owning them and you can transfer assets by adding or removing beneficiaries without those transfers being taxable. This whole, completely legal, scheme is what the panama papers uncovered and it is still used by the wealthy to shield their assets from any liability.

>>514891539
If it's joint ownership, of course you can't give it away.
If it's not joint ownership, you can.
What will the judge do when you show up in court, having just last week completed the title transfer to your mother? The judge may be angry with you, but who cares he was going to screw over the male anyway. But he cannot allocate an asset that is not before him. That house is gone. Nor is that a basis for assigning alimony in any way I've heard.

Of course you did it to shield the asset. We all do things for reasons. It was your asset and you made a legal transaction with it.

>>514891670
I like to call it twatenfreude.

>>514881156
yes retard. you tried to do it right before the divorce. the video implies it was always in his mothers name and she just didn't know. massive difference. he did something smart while you asked about doing something stupid

>>514885205
Did she get half?

>>514881156
Diverting assests in an attempt to hide them from divorce proceedings is based

>>514891963
>twatenfreude.

>>514880952 (OP)
>Divorced wife finds out her ex-husband's house is owned by her mother
So she didn't know she paid rent to her ex-husband's mother instead of to her ex-husband - but why does it matter who her landlord/landlady is, unless it's a shark who takes overprice?

>>514891901
So in the divorce you must disclose all assets. You are a beneficiary of that trust, so that probably must be disclosed. The judge asks for the assets held in the trust and learns there is a corporation. The judge asks for the balance sheet of the corporation and sees a house there.
Then he orders you to transfer that asset (since you control the trust) to your ex-wife.

Why would this not be available to the judge.

Giving the house to your mom is better. Then there's no way for the judge to touch it, because he cannot order your mother to do anything.

>>514880952 (OP)
>>514882704
Fuck you and your bait, shitskin.

>>514891651
Probably, unless the supoena'd video footage from the casino

>>514892136
He's not hiding it. He can bring a megaphone into court and announce loudly that his mother has the house.
But the judge can't touch it.

>>514881156
Call the law offices of Rabbinowitz, Rabbinowitz and Rabbinowitz. Get the oldest Rabbinowitz, he's the most jewish.

>>514892215
I may be missing some steps, but the gist of it is you don't own the trust, you are merely the beneficiary. The judge cannot order the trust to order the corporation to liquidate assets to pay your debt. The benefit of doing that over something like giving it to your mother is that your mother could run over some niglet, get sued, and then the house gets sold anyway. Using a trust and corporation structure the asset is shielded from everything except what the corporation does, which as a shell corp is absolutely nothing. It also allows you to transfer assets without that transfer being a taxable event.

Women will have bios like this and think they are worth marrying.

>>514892393
Definitely advise a Jewish lawyer. They will help you win, not try to make things fair or simp to the female.

I'm not a lawyer and not experienced with divorces, but I am Jewish, you can read my views above in this thread.

>>514892693
So your mother owns the trust i.e. you give her the trust containing the corporation owning the house. But now the house is protected against suits against her too.

OK. But that was an extremely important point. Your mother must own the trust, or the house. Not you.

Furthermore if there's a trust, I think there is still disclosure because you are a beneficiary. If you have an income stream from it (right to live in the house) the judge may take the financial value of that and transfer it to your ex. I'd worry about this unless my lawyer told me it could not happen.

If the mother simply owns the house and could kick you out at any time, that's harder for the judge to assign economic value to.

>>514880952 (OP)
> indian
> collecting scam based tik toks
pottery

Cant her lawyer find out what it was worth when her husband owned it and claim half the value so the husband owes that amount to her in garnished wages?

I dont want that to be possible, but the legal system doesnt always seem to be effective or fair

>>514892712
I bet that's a bait bio lmao. which one of you did this?
I refuse to believe that's real

I am a woman. I have my own house and income. If I get married everything is separate.

His for his. Mine for mine.

Fuck you divorce faggots and sex traffickers on 4chan pol.

Cut off the strings and motherfucking leave him to his shit if he wants a divorce.

>>514880952 (OP)
Greedy whore deserves to be homeless.

>>514880952 (OP)
I wish her misery and financial hardship for a long time.

>>514893639
The judge can assign alimony.

>>514893639
To do that, the husband would have to have broken some law, legally a "tort", a civil offense against the ex-wife. What civil offense did he commit by transferring his own house to his mother? I doubt there was fraud unless he promised never to do that.

She said he lied, but he didn't lie. He never discussed it with her.


It's better if he did it right before the divorce. Then even if she relied on his owning the house, and that reliance had some value (say the value of her cooking and cleaning and he gets no credit for providing the roof, which is absurd but still it is divorce court where females are favored) she didn't rely on it for very long, so any civil penalty on this theory would be small.

Even if there were child support (which there is not here) I don't think the judge could assign that cashflow.

>>514894067
I think she wanted the divorce. Until she found out she wasn't getting the house or any part of it.

A man can't marry a woman and make demands to serve him only and then divorce and throw her out on the streets.

>>514894434
Hm

Did he cheat?

>>514894269
True, but that's limited and just intended to give her time to start earning money. And "his mother owns the house we lived in" is not an excuse to raise the amount of alimony.

>>514894513
Alimony

>>514894438
Yes he can, and a woman can do the same.
>>514894481
I have no idea, maybe she did, and it probably doesn't matter legally. No-fault divorce.

>>514894570
Alimony

>>514894624
No. You're confusing mutual divorce between a childless couple and couple with children.

>>514882704
>>514880952 (OP)
women are evil demons that will rob you of everything you have if they can get away with it. this is a crime that must be punished with death and nothing less

>>514880952 (OP)
not a bad move actually

>>514894703
Are there children here? I didn't notice that they were mentioned. Even so I don't see how it would matter. Other than that if the house cannot be transferred, he is more likely to get custody (always "in the best interest of the children") since he'll have the house available and she won't.

>>514880952 (OP)
Total Femcunt Death.
No Remorse!

>>514890666
Judges are evil criminals and thieves, honestly it's insane how much power they have.

>>514889229
>Obviously it's not fair. If she's not working because she's supposed to be at home taking care of the house, then she's entitled to half. Why would a woman choose to get married if you force her to leave her job, but you can just leave her with nothing in the end?

Bla Bla fucking Bla Bla im an entitled femcunt and im OWED atleast half because I wiped a kitchen counter down and scrubbed a few particles of shit around the toilet bowl every now and then.

>>514885241
Your streets and businesses are covered in Celtic names lmao. I like it though, America forgot potato nigger racism seemingly overnight.

>>514880952 (OP)

Why is this renter complaining?

>>514892712
>33
>legit looking for a husband and rolemodel for my 3 kids
Literally stopped reading there.

>>514889229

to have her life paid for?

you act as if women produce anything and dont shut down progress

>>514890137
read the whole post

woman should have 0 money same as jew nig poo

>>514895351
Did the judge assign alimony? I didn't see her getting anything, maybe they split the value of some possessions. I don't want her to be homeless if she has a right to a share of the assets. But she definitely has no right to a share of the house, which was the big issue. And he saved it by transferring it to mom so the court could not touch it.

>>514895351
And we Jews get money, because we understand these things and can make rational decisions. This is pretty much common sense, I am not even a lawyer, but I bet a lawyer would not find much wrong in what I've said.

>>514880952 (OP)
she took all the steaks out the fridge when she left, we are even

>>514889703
>>514890666
In this situation he absolutely should have taken out that snatch. 10 years in prison ain't shit compared to getting fucked that hard.

>>514895726
Bingo.

>>514880952 (OP)
Based Chad finds a loophole! Seethe roastie cunt!

>>514895780
Meant for
>>514890741

>>514891963
This is why I come here.

>>514881897
Based lamentation lover.

>>514892274
I love this webm so much

>>514890257
(((Silver)))

>>514891354
Its called personal private property.
Any property owned before the marriage is not subject to division.
Alot of roasties learn that the hard way, marrying some dude with a lot of property thinking they'll be able to get some of it after they divorce.
Believe it or not, many women marry men for that sole reason. Shocking I know.
Take Bezos wife, she absolutely deserved everything she got from that cad because she was with him well before he had it all.
His new troll however, won't be entitled to any of it really. She will be entitled to a fat alimony though.

>>514892693
I think even trusts are ultimately owned?
So if you are the sole beneficiary then you are the owner of the trust, so then it kinda seems like it should fall apart.
Unless this is that corporate personhood thing people talk about.
I feel like you can be around someone enough to know what they are like and if they are manipulative or whatever, like before you marry them.

>>514897017
>she absolutely deserved everything she got from that cad because she was with him well before he had it all.
She doesn't deserve shit. Was she working for the company as a business partner? No. FOH simp.

>>514891651
sounds based. marriage is a dead institution. only idiots would enter into this arrangement.

>>514880952 (OP)
Repeal No-Fault Divorce. It should be till DEATH do thee Part. If it's bad enough, put them in the ground first.

>>514885708
Unless they are lawyers already, women tend to be too stupid and lazy to actually know the law. They're so used to the laws favoring them in general that they neglect knowing the specifics because all they have to do is cry wolf to get what they want generally speaking, so if you know what you're doing legally to protect yourself from divorce rape ahead of time, you can usually beat the worst of it.

>>514897563
Based Henry the VIII abider.

>>514896214
don't forget that is an actual quote from Genghis Khan.

>>514880952 (OP)
Retarded whore should be killed on the spot then and there

>>514882126
you're right that this is fraud

>>514891651
What a based retard kek

lol dumb whore

>>514892693
Alex Jones tried this and failed miserably.
The trust thing only works when you're not the that owns the trust, and you're nit the sole beneficiary.

I recently saw a guy have even his workmanship comp and disability taken from him. Even after he was divorced.

There was a guy who got divorced then after the divorce won the lottery and even he had to split the winnings with his ex-wife that he divorced before he won the lottery.