>>514898359
As far as I know, Norks were only used for a small period on a small part of the front (Kursk), and I guess the main reason was because Kim wanted his troops to get some battle experience
Something like 12,000 Nork soldiers in Kursk for a brief period of time is not a lot in a war that involves like a million soldiers on each side and in which some claim that Russian losses exceed 1 million
I haven't heard of Africans etc being used in significant numbers at all
If the Russians do rely heavily on Norks, Africans, etc, doesn't that mean losses of actual Russians are not so large?