>>514974201
>A country with a functional rule of law wouldn't have those guys planning to break into my house in the first place.
There's always going to be crime.
There's crime in prison, so even in a place with guards all over the place and everyone being watched you can't stop crime fully.
Like they say in America, when seconds count the police are minutes away (and that's being very optimistic).
>The idea anyone needs a gun is fucking retarded.
Everyone should have the right to own a gun. The Prime minister is surrounded by guns to keep him safe, as are the Royals. It's only the hoi polloi who are denied this right and left at the mercy of criminals.
> We need to torture every criminal to death in public. We need to amputate hands for theft and we need to behead in public for assault and murder.
That's unlikely to happen and I'd argue would have more resistance than ownership of guns.
Also it wouldn't stop all crimes, it would stop some but you can't legislate low impulse control or people who are just nutcases out of existence.
There's also the other fact that the public are disarmed because politicians fear an armed populus. Guns used to be legal in the UK, it wasn't that long ago. You can read Orwell arguing in favor of it in his time.
>>514974330
I don't know which case you're meaning to be posting but I assume it's some illegal immigrant who caused a crime, obviously mass deportations are needed no matter what.