>>514989453
are you such an enfeebled individual that seeing and knowing the issues of the world, you would not do your best to raise your children separate from them, and to otherwise raise them to see the issues and work to fix them at least for their own life?
there have always been tough, terrible times in history. yet still people chose to try and raise another generation, to try and give them a better world, are at least raise them to make a better one for themselves.
there is no reason but weakness and a disdain and distrust in yourself to not do the same.
>>514989592
>chad
a hypothetical scaremongering tactic thought up by a cuck as an excuse to not find or manipulate a women into being acceptable for your standards.
>debt
im not christian and it is entirely on your own shoulders what you leave for your children or not. again, assumptions and the musings of a person with no self esteem, trust, and clear disdain for themselves.
>zoomers
zoomers and alphas are both showing signs of being significantly more right leaning, especially the males. their dumb trends are no different than the idiocy all generations have as kids, only heightened by the internet.
regardless, their failures are not nor were guaranteed. it is up to YOU to raise your own better than they were, should you see issues with them. otherwise, if you refuse, then you have removed yourself form the strongest point of change and influence in the next generations life, and should not be taken seriously when you complain that they too are only idiots raised by idiots.
children are still being born, and will continue to be. whether its white conservatives or shitskin hordes, we shall see. giving the world to the lowest of us without attempting to stem the tide is simply conceding defeat however. if that is your take, so be it, but then your opinion means nothing, and you should get off /pol/ and go elsewhere, as your ideas will be replaced by others in time guaranteed, instead of by chance.
