That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did... You deserved it.
>>515196982 (OP)
they're literally just setting him up as a fall guy so that at the very least the left is satisfied. The left is infantile retards who would be happy with "orange hitler" going down and then it'll just turn into a partisan issue that you don't dare question the outcome of. (i.e. 1 person on the list gets canned while every else wanders free).
Absolutely lock him up but don't make that the end of the story. Epstein had many clients on both sides of the partisan divide.
>>515196982 (OP)
I'm leaning into yes. It wouldn't surprise me if he did have sex with kids, but the fact that he is so FEROCIOUSLY trying to cover up the story is proof that either he did have sex with kids, or he is covering for people who did.
/pol/ will cope and seethe about this for eternity. It's absolutely pathetic how the posters here behave on this topic. They turn into a bunch of juveniles bringing up unrelated things and stalling. What are they so afraid of?
>>515196982 (OP)
Doesn't matter.
Chuds with psychological stake in the game will reject any evidence for as fabricated and against as absolutely true.
Libruls will do the opposite.
At this point whether he actually diddled weans is besides the point.