>>515289857
>the samson option
you know.. nukes are really not as effective as hollywood makes them out to be. the reason the japanese cities were obliterated was because in the first instant, they were made of wood and wood burns. a nuke is just an incendiary device. if it were true that the jews had nukes aimed at every city in the world, or even just every city in europe.. the idea that they would have enough nukes to actually destroy all those cities is preposterous. perhaps they would kill or maim a lot of people.. but if a single nuke hit a city, structurally it would be fine. they would need gigantic force the tear does the copious amounts of concrete and brick and steel that hold up every single building, constructed in various different forms, are intersecting angles, so on and so forth. the amount of nukes it would require to even be able to theoretically flatten a city made up of brick, or stone, or cement, is far and above what israel could even hope to hold. you would never be able to hide that many nukes in such a small area.
the idea that 'nukes are this devastating force that destroys all in its path' is not less a hollywood theatrical display than 2 planes taking out skyscrapers in manhattan. the jew needs people to be afraid of nukes flying so that the 'samson option' seems like a threat, much as they need people to believe a passenger jet aircraft (which is mostly just a tube of air) is capable of causing a skyscraper to collapse upon its own foundations to convince people that a handful of dress wearing freaks in the middle east are are threat to them in their own homes. because if you are capable of doing that much damage with a plane, you can do it no matter where in the world you are based, and if you are capable of causing that much destruction with a single missile then you can cause mass and inescapable death from anywhere in the world. all of a sudden the world seems a lot smaller and the risk a whole like greater.
