Thread 515456093

>libs copy this argument in a mocking tone en-masse
>not realizing that Charlie would unironically agree that him being shot would in no way affect his opinions on gun rights
Have they just never met someone who would genuinely die for his beliefs before? Is the idea of martyrdom completely foreign to them? Are they just projecting, thinking “well, if I got shot, I would be anti-gun, so he probably would too!”? Why do people think his death would affect his beliefs in any way?

>>515456093 (OP)
Kinda like how right wingers laugh at liberals for getting killed by niggers

>>515456292
right-wingers acknowledge and accept the risks/costs of the 2nd amendment. it's like cars. cars cause a lot of deaths and injuries annually, but they're a really useful thing. you don't deserve to get killed by a car for supporting peoples' ability to own and operate cars.

leftists on the other hand lie to themselves and obfuscate crime data and go to the ends of the earth to not accept that niggers are as violent and destructive as they really are.

>>515456292
I mean, it makes sense for non-whites to put niggers over whites, and it also makes sense for whites groomed all their life into loathing their own race to also believe that.

>>515456672
And yet republicans believe niggers should own guns

>>515457026
They already do. The problem is that you’re not allowed to shoot back at them. Dems only wanna exacerbate that problem, since they don’t have any plans to regulate guns acquired illegally.