← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 515530836

2 posts 2 images 2 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: QgsuDNzH) Australia No.515530836 >>515531696
B-but he said mean words reeee!!
I hate having to share a world with you worthless faggots. I was no real fan of Charlie Kirk. He was too moderate and pro Jew in my opinion.

However, he didn't deserve to die. He had a wife and two kids. To watch a man sit there one moment, and then just bleed out and see the life drain from him within seconds is truly fucking horrifying.

Then to have all you worthless disgusting fags make memes of it, laugh at it, is just fucking gross.

Knowing that I have to live in a world where there are retarded faggots like you who think "Guy said words I don't like. Guy deserves to die tragic death" is just the absolute fucking worse.

The guy made noises with his mouth you didn't like, so in your lefty nigger monkey brains you think he deserves to die. That was his big crime in your eyes. Making "mean" noises with his mouth.

And by the way, he didn't even say anything that shocking. Charlie Kirk was a moderate, centre right social conservative. I've said way more extreme shit than he ever did. So have most people.

Fuck all you nigger monkey brained retards. This board is full of subhuman fuckwits.
Anonymous (ID: PEv1LmjH) United States No.515531696
>>515530836 (OP)
War is the continuation of diplomacy by other means.
A man falling after being shot dead is not thought thereby to be proven in error as to his views. His very involvement in such a trial gives evidence of a new and broader view. The willingness of the principals to forgo further argument—as the triviality which it in fact is—and to petition directly the chambers of the historical absolute, clearly indicates of how little moment are the opinions, and of what great moment the divergences thereof. For the argument is indeed trivial, but not so the separate wills thereby made manifest. Man's vanity may well approach the infinite in capacity but ultimately he must submit himself before a higher court. Here there can be no special pleading. Here are considerations of equity, and rectitude, and moral right rendered void and without warrant. Decisions of life and death, of what shall be and what shall not, beggar all question of right. In elections of these magnitudes are all lesser ones subsumed: moral, spiritual, natural.