Thread 515540519

Was he right?

>>515540519 (OP)
from the point of view of a jew owned sociopath, i guess.

>>515540519 (OP)
Depends if he's on the giving or receiving end

>>515540519 (OP)
interestingly he said "Sympathy I prefer more than empathy" just after this
imagine how wild this thread would be if people didnt know that

>>515540519 (OP)
Yes, he's right. It's the reason why white countries are being destroyed right now.

I think he was moreso referring to self destructive over-tolerance, like that inverted empathy heatmap where leftists seem to value people who are only far away from them (in both proximity, values, appearance, tradition, etc) over those who are close to them in their "tribe" so to speak

I dont think charlie would seriously reject the golden rule or wouldnt help his fellow man in a typical way. he was a religious family man, he'd likely have empathy for someone broken down on the side of the road and help them. I think he's speaking to a particular over-tolerance

>>515540519 (OP)
yes. now shut the fuck about it

>>515540823
Hard to feel sympathy without empathy
Without it it's just empty prayers or statements

>>515540519 (OP)
I'd say the results speak for themeselves

>>515541080
agreed, but the word "empathy" is weaponised now

Its all a smokescreen.

Trump is a pedophile.

Release the list.

>>515540519 (OP)
Empathy is solely a White trait; it is wonderful in a homogenous White society but ultimately harmful in a mixed society

Astrology and theology are intertwined with politics, and you don't realist. Together quickly here is some critical threads: Remphan is Saturn, and Saturn is Satan, with Baal and Moloch serving as the earthly manifestations. Just as God revealed Himself fully in Christ, so too does Satan project his archetype through false gods. Israel’s flag bears the Star of Remphan, the ancient Saturnian hexagram, marking its prophetic role in the unfolding drama. The plan is for the world to turn against Israel, Israel wants the entire world to turn against them, but not just yet, to scapegoat it, so that the leadership of Zion can seize the moment, execute the final order, and bring forth the Third Temple and their false Messiah, catalyzing a counterfeit Armageddon in conjunction with expansion of borders to Greater Israel.

This is where René Girard’s mimetic theory becomes essential. Think deeper. The cycle of desire, rivalry, and violence resolves in the scapegoat mechanism, a ritual expulsion or sacrifice. It is heavily alluded to by Peter Thiel, a master manipulator of narrative who understands this mechanism and bends it to serve the Synagogue of Satan. The scapegoat mechanism prepares the world to channel its rage toward Israel and this is exactly what Zionist leadership desires, because it creates the conditions for their eschatological inversion.
Events like the Shane Devon Tamura/BlackRock shooting, the 8.8 earthquake, and the recent blood moon are not random they are ritual markers within a larger esoteric playbook. They synchronize with ancient prophecy and modern statecraft to signal a shift into the next stage. This is no longer about conventional politics or even geopolitics; it is about the Saturnian framework of deception and harvest. The pieces are set, the timing is aligned, and the veils are being torn away. Those who do not yet see must awaken quickly, because the machinery is moving, and the script is being enacted in real time. Israel serves Satan.

>>515542539
Empathy is what led homogenous white societies to become mongrelized mixed ones. It's fundamentally a self-destructive trait.

>>515540519 (OP)
Ironic but his view on this aligns with Karl Marx who thought empathy was something that could be weaponized by bad forces

>>515540519 (OP)
This narrative was just a retarded line of attack imo, it sets you up for easy gotchas, especially when you get an impromptu throat stoma by some fucking psycho.

>>515540519 (OP)
Empathy is something that psychopaths/sociopaths don’t have but they then try to tell everybody they have empathy for marginalized and brown “people”. So in that sense it’s meaningless because leftist empathy isn’t empathy at all. Empathy seems to be something white people naturally have if they’re not autistic or sociopathic that many other races do not.

Maximize all human suffering. Plunge the world into constant, unending misery for as many people as physically possible.

>>515542346
Well we are living in crazy times
You were one bad dice roll away from your soul ending up in a third worlder so count your blessings and realize that you have more in common with your fellow man then differences

>>515542623
I believe you anon, this is the most salient post I've seen on here in a while, sincerely.
What do you mean by "eschatological inversion"? The fact they're trying to force Gods hand and bring about armageddon, return of their messiah (possibly antichrist)?
Any further insights you'd like to share? Imma go read up on Rene Girard while i wait.

>>515540519 (OP)
>Was he right?
We live in a society that has quite a few myths/illusions that we believe to be fundamental truths. We've only had the word itself for about 100 years (early 20th century coining), and there don't appear to be any earlier synonyms for it. But since its introduction, children are taught this word, taught that it is real, and that if they don't have this thing (which hasn't even existed for most of history), they're demonically evil (in a secular, atheistic way). Even if empathy were a real thing (dubious, at the very least), why should it be so that empathy should be so universal? There are vegans out there wanting you to feel empathy for chickens and lobsters. Why should there be empathy for the grown adults of foreign nations and foreign races with bizarre and (often) incompatible value systems? Sympathy is better (goes back to the 1500s etymologically-speaking), and at least demands that it only occur when you can relate to the other person.

>>515540519 (OP)
>I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.

As always leftists fail to win any debates so they just resort to being disingenuous.

Oh wow its actually even worse.
>The new communications strategy is not to do what Bill Clinton used to do, where he would say, "I feel your pain." Instead, it is to say, "You're actually not in pain." So let's just, little, very short clip. Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It was all about empathy and sympathy. I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.

>>515540519 (OP)
No.

Why the fuck would anyone have any empathy for someone who sees empathy as a weakness?

>>515540519 (OP)
he then says sympathy is a better term to use, he wasn't saying he was against caring about other people

>>515544841
>You were one bad dice roll away your soul ending up in a third worlder
not how souls work

>>515540519 (OP)
>Hates trans people
>Hates empathy
>Thinks underage women should be forced to deliver rape babies
>Wants to make all abortion illegal

Tell me why I’m supposed to care again?

>>515540519 (OP)
Oh no, a narcissist with a god complex who thinks empathy is a weakness and sees all people as beneath him and thinks he will single handedly save the country by forcing people to adapt to his beliefs got whacked
Quick, everybody have empathy for him

Spew hate, get hate in return
You get what you deserve
Karma

And so on and so forth

>>515544841
Not how souls work. If you're White it's because your soul is White, and therefore divine in nature. Who knows whether other races have them at all, and which ones. Probably a couple.
>>515547014
This is the person that wants you to have empathy. They see it as weakness, and will use it to step on you and yours.

>>515546668
>>515547276
Triggered dipshits
You should pray every day that God landed you in a first world body
Being white is actually a privilege on a global scale

>>515540519 (OP)
>sees empathy as a weakness?
He didnt say it was a weakness.
Are you illiterate or just born retarded?

I dont think you actually have empathy at all.

>>515540519 (OP)
Empathy is a gaytheist made up lie. It’s an invented concept meant to replace Christian law and subservience to God. The problem is that “empathy” doesn’t give any objective moral standard. Empathy is just subjective human feeling. So trying to use that as a replacement and justification instead of the Word of God and what He ordains will never work and can only result in chaos and a breakdown of the social order as everyone just adheres to their own subjective idea of “empathy” which ultimately prioritizes themselves

>>515540519 (OP)
he was. but he stopped short. the very concept of morality is made up bullshit used to get good people to second guess whether or not they are doing the right thing.

>>515540519 (OP)
sorry but we just need to keep dangerous schizos in prison. i know, i know...its mean but we just go to do it. tax payers dont like getting robbed, raped and murdered, thats all.

>>515547550
not how souls work bucko

empathy(n.)

1908, modeled on German Einfühlung (from ein "in" + Fühlung "feeling"), which was coined 1858 by German philosopher Rudolf Lotze (1817-1881) as a translation of Greek empatheia "passion, state of emotion," from assimilated form of en "in" (see en- (2)) + pathos "feeling" (from PIE root *kwent(h)- "to suffer"). A term from a theory of art appreciation that maintains appreciation depends on the viewer's ability to project his personality into the viewed object.

>>515547550
white privilege isnt real. its jewish liberalism propaganda to demoralize whites. i have no white guilt and i reject your idea of white privilege.

>>515548310
So, this nigga kirt couldn't even pass a chimpanzee mirror test

>>515540519 (OP)

Yes. Leftists are destroying the english language in real-time and I am shocked that there isn't any outrage over it.
Centuries of linguistic development being eroded by men who started putting on dresses because they are the family disappointment.

>>515548474
the idea that priviledge is bad is the problem. I am very privileged, God has been very kind to me, if someone has a problem with that they ought to be thinking about what makes them different from me not "how dare you". and if they cant manage that? All I have to say to that is a very obnoxious "fuck em"

>>515540519 (OP)
he got apathed

>>515548552
Almost nobody passes the open a dictionary test, much less look into the etymology.
Hard to argue words and history of words without definitions and history.

>>515540519 (OP)
Empathy is bad. People will weaponize empathy to do things you wouldnt do. They use same tactics in my workplace at hospital as well. Noo anon you cant leave on time. There are still patients needing your help. Fuck off faggot im not paid for doing overtime and fixing your staff issues. They use same tactics in politics as well.

>>515540823
Sympathy is easy to fake; empathy is not by definition. Sociopaths and psychopaths simply hate empathy because they can't do it...again by definition....

>>515548049
Either all humans have souls or no one does
If you deny creation then the kingdom of heaven may be closed to you

>>515549310
>empathy is not by definition.
Which machine or instrument detects this un-fake-able empathy? A phenomenon so un-fake-able and real, that no one bothered to make up a word for it until after the airplane was invented.

With sympathy, there is no point in faking it. Either you can relate to the person and their discomfort and you sympathize, or you don't and feel no need to fake it. No one gets faggy brownie points for sympathy. Someone can feel sympathy for you, and still be resolved to do what they will.

Faggots and other leftoids want the entire universe to love them unconditionally, but I do not love you. I would not love you even if I came to know you. It would be unnatural for me to love you, and there's something wrong with you for wanting my love. And that's still true even if you use the word "empathy" to refer to it.

>>515548827
>in real time
been going on forever. leftists arent new theyve always been the scourge of empires. There hasnt been a single language that didnt, after becoming formalized, start degrading and eroding over time. While the men worked and fought the scum planted the seeds of stagnation and death. tale as old as time. Every so often a civilization got wise to it and smashed down with an iron fist. but more often it went unnoticed and ultimately culminated in a collapse and an exodus. The time to stop mincing words is now. stop allowing people to tiptoe around calling things precisely what they are. leftism is the scourge of nations, satanists, everything they do and say revolves around being adversarial to everything that is good and wholesome, anything that fosters a stable society is their enemy, their snark being nothing but a mask to hide malice, they make themselves fools so that reasonable men might say "they are just foolish, their intent isnt explicitly evil". but it is, they clap when good people suffer and cry when evil men are punished. That such a thing is tolerable, that such a thing "just is what it is", are abject poison and it needs to be done away with.

>>515546005
Are you legitimately dumb? Like anon I'm sorry, but legitimately? "which hasn't even existed for most of history". Like have you ever opened a history book? There are endless examples of empathic actions - that is, actions people took because they could place themselves in the situation of the other, without any personal benefit whatsoever. It's an extremely ancient trait that's been with us from even before we were monkeys. You doofus

>>515551473
empathy isnt sympathy. empathy is ignoring every wrong to benefit people who dont deserve good things.

>>515540519 (OP)
Of course, every leftists with empathy finds it funny that a White man was killed in front of his children and then, tried to dismiss their own accountability by saying what they are doing is not evil because Kirk is a nazi.

Every Leftists is evil.

>>515549691
every race has a soul
you're a fragment

>>515540519 (OP)
At least in case of himself he was spot on. He doesn't deserve any empathy.

>>515547014
You extrapolated that from one screenshot? That's retarded. He clearly has a moral compass he is probably on about a modern twisted definition rather than saying that people who have empathy are bad.

Calm your zippertits troony

>>515551473
>but legitimately? "which hasn't even existed for most of history". Like have you ever opened a history book?
I have. I'm well-read. You though, you got mostly Bs in school, and they told you that you qualified for the gifted class, huh? The word doesn't show up until the early 20th century in English, and the concept itself is late 19th century. Go look it up, I can wait.

>There are endless examples of empathic actions
No, you just imagine that. Linguistically, if there were so many examples (endless!), then someone would have coined a word for it, or borrowed it from another language (oh, wait, they didn't have any words for it either!).
>actions people took because they could place themselves in the situation of the other,
That's sympathy. When you can relate to the other person, when you can see it from their perspective, you understand them. Perhaps you can be a bit more kind, and you certainly refuse to blame them for the parts that they aren't culpable. But it doesn't sway you.

This must be so confusing to you. You've been brainfucked since before you can remember, and you believe this empathy is real. You believe that unless you defend it (since if it is undefended, then your "feelers" won't mean anything), no one will know how awesomely empathetic you are.

>It's an extremely ancient trait that's been with us f
Fuckstick, when have you ever studied antiquity? How many ancient languages do you read? Hell, when you have to read translations (because you HAVE to, you can't read it in the original), how often was the translator born post-1950? Nothing you say makes even a goddamned bit of sense, but you believe this shit. If there is an opposite to this empathy thing, I feel that for you. You disgust me.

>>515551803
The words are interchangeable. Like, they literally mean the same thing. Only sub 80 IQ retards think they mean different things, because they don't understand the underlying concepts

Anyway in the full quote Kirk appears to imply that NEITHER are good, but that sympathy is at least preferable. So yeah there's really no saving this retarded ass quote from him

>>515548827
The English language has been changing for hundreds of years, do you think the English you speak now is the same as the one from 500 years ago?

>>515540519 (OP)
He is right unfortunately, the ability to understand other humans is important but "empathy" has been perberted into a self flagellating death cult wherein we must punish ourselves and others like us for percieved slights of the past otherwise we are bad people and any pushback against this suicide pact is seen as justification an evil.

>>515552729
>I have. I'm well-read
Yeah, what's your degree big dawg

>Linguistically, if there were so many examples (endless!), then someone would have coined a word for it, or borrowed it from another language (oh, wait, they didn't have any words for it either!).
They did. They said sympathy, and this separation between sympathy and empathy is a later granularity which ultimately doesn't really make sense except in the heads of 80 IQ retards like you

>Fuckstick, when have you ever studied antiquity?
LMAO. Are you going to tell me with a straight face that there isn't one, single recorded historic event, in which someone did something for someone without any conceivable chance of "return" on that action? How much do you want to bet me on that?

Embarrassing posts

>>515553260
>The words are interchangeable.
For sub-literate fucktards, maybe. Words are never perfectly synonymous, but these two aren't even meant to be slightly so. Sympathy is the ability to relate to someone who is in trouble or pain. Empathy is a visceral feeling, as if you experience the anxiety/pain/whatever yourself. But such a distinction is beyond you, or possibly... you've been brainfucked so completely by "empathy is a real thing" that you can no longer imagine being able to sympathize with someone without "empathizing" with them.

These words are never interchangeable, and if you're using them interchangeably then you're just using those words wrong.
>>515554288
>Yeah, what's your degree big dawg
You don't even use punctuation. Come back when you stop talking like a nigger, and we can discuss that.
>>515554288
>They said sympathy, and this separation between sympathy and empathy is a later granularity
No, it's not. The "granularity" isn't artificial, the words and concepts did not even exist concurrently.
>in which someone did something for someone without any conceivable chance of "return" on that action?
Again, you're imagining. People do all sorts of things without there being any chance of a "return", and quite often it's not "empathy". When it is inarguably "empathy", that only happens after the word/concept had been introduced. Sometimes people do such things for entertainment, or to see "what will happen", or even to thwart some perceived enemy that they despise (to the benefit of the recipient). But most often, I think, is the sense of justice which was always a much more powerful impetus in antiquity.

Never "empathy". You can't even understand anyone who wasn't alive just recently. All of the world prior to the mid-20th century might as well be an alien planet to you. Hell, you're one of those zoomer faggots that can't even understand your parents' generation ("why did they fuck the world over and fuck me over too?!?!?!").

>>515540519 (OP)
He means in the frame of a political discussion, and he's obviously correct. A psychopath appeals primarily to one's empathy in order to frame their argument as morally superior. But the true purpose is as an authoritative lever to compel you to do something rather than for you to have your own individual freedom to make your own choices.

>>515540519 (OP)
lack of empathy is a sign of autism

>>515540519 (OP)
Empathy has been abused by the kike for nearly 80years to receive special treatment in Europe and the US. He is absolutely right.

>>515540519 (OP)
Unironically yes.
Empathy was developed in early humans to enhance social cohesion in tribes to improve chances of survival and reproduction in small groups of hunter/gatherers. Empathy in itself is just a means to an end for survival. As our societies got larger and more competitive we lost the evolutionary advantage of having empathy.

Today empathy is a slave mentality in large hyper-competitive societies because it reduces the strong to the level of the weak, fundamentally undermining natural selection and hindering the growth of the strong. Nietzsche once said that we are deprived of strength when we feel pity for it might "seduce us into weakness", and he was right. Think about any time in your life where you have used empathy for anything you thought was productive:

>Donated money to charity
Used to fund terrorists
>Donated money to the homeless
Spent on drugs
>Donated money to some faggot's GoFundMe
Pocketed by kikes
>Invited a homeless person into your house
Robbed
>Picked up a hitchhiker
Murdered

Every time you use your empathy you get weaker.
EMPATHY is SLAVERY.
Jews champion empathy for Whites because in its current form it is a subversion of the White man's burden. It is no longer our destiny to conquer the world as it was in previous centuries but instead subsidize their growth through empathy, which only makes us weaker and more reliant on them for our own growth, hence the "DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH" slogans everywhere.

What's funny is that /pol/ will say that having no empathy is Jewish, meanwhile they celebrate their own supposed oppression and genocide by talking about how special and unique Whites are because we have empathy. As if it's not the weakest shit ever busting your balls everyday at a 9 to 5 to subsidize kids in the congo LMFAO.

>>515540907
He didn't even have empathy for his daughter. Guy said he'd force his 10 year old daughter to have her rapist's baby. He's a piece of shit who didn't care about anyone except himself.

>>515540519 (OP)
you've seen how empathetic leftists are

>>515542882
I suppose ol' Karl had to be right about something eventually

>>515540519 (OP)
>Was he right?
To give context, he was talking about how Western empathy has been weaponized into making us accept infinity migration, all the perversions imaginable as normal, and to fund harebrained aid programs the world over.

And he's right.

>>515555808
>He is absolutely right
Ok, why even have an in-group then? How do you protect your own if you don't have empathy for them?

>>515550670
Retard. You don't even know your enemy. Leftism is a historically specific political tendency that arose from the French Revolution and didn't really take off until the Industrial Revolution was in full swing.
Also, language is never static, it is constantly changing and evolving. This is always how language has worked. Formalizing it is a fool's errand. The only static languages are dead languages like Latin.

>>515541118
>typical cuckservative hairline

>>515540519 (OP)
Yes it's irredeemable as a word in conversation. That and now 'cruelty' is the other weasel word. It's used for narcissistic supply and to dismiss whoever you're against by framing them as cruel. With how bad faith discussion has become every mention of empathy is subject to being code for slandering an out group as monsters. Always scam a leftoid's argument for those two keywords: empathy and cruelty. You're dealing with a demonic faggot weaponizing those concepts if you see those words anywhere in the body of their message.

>>515555833
>Empathy was developed in early humans to enhance social cohesion in tribes to improve chances of survival
But, in those circumstances, you would only have empathy for your tribe, for close kin even. The idea that you could have empathy for 8 billion people, even those who do not look like you, do not think like you, live on the other side of the planet, and (in some cases) want you dead for bizarre reasons... that's so fantastical that it borders on shit-your-pants mental retardation. The idea that this empathy should extend to any chicken that's not organic free-range cage-free.

These concepts are so distant to each other, that calling them by the same word is absurd. And I'm still highly skeptical of the first, though obviously not quite as dismissive as I am of the latter.

>>515555933
>He didn't even have empathy for his daughter.
You can't understand this because you're childless, but I would always feel more for my grandchildren's generation than for my children's generation. They're simply more important, need more consideration. How that mental calculus isn't instant and perfect for you, I'll never know, but it makes it even more hilarious coming from someone who whines about being more caring for others.

>>515547276
defiitely the Japanese and some Viets
maybe Hawaiians too, not sure

>>515540519 (OP)
Yes, I have no empathy for him. He had niggers and faggots at his events trying to normalize the spiritual and physical death of all gentiles. He was Israel's strongest soldier and the moment he began to stray away from Israel worship, his own masters shot him in the neck like the animal he was.

>>515540519 (OP)
When it comes to commie leftist scum. Absolutely.

>>515540519 (OP)
>Was he right?
I'd say a word doesn't do half as much damage as a bullet does and I think Charlie would agree to that now, if he still could

>>515540519 (OP)
>feel empathy for people that want me dead for not being a psychotic leftard
but why?

>>515555575
>Sympathy is the ability to relate to someone who is in trouble or pain. Empathy is a visceral feeling, as if you experience the anxiety/pain/whatever yourself
These two things are relying on the exact same underlying mechanism. It should be intuitive even just from your own sentence. In mechanistic terms, it's a really simple function where the ease with which a person can place themselves in the situation of another (mostly because the situation is something that they recognise, that they have gone through) combined with the strength of the emotion that the observer WOULD feel in that recognised situation, describes the strength of their empathic/sympathetic reaction
>No, it's not. The "granularity" isn't artificial, the words and concepts did not even exist concurrently
Because for most of history, language wasn't as complex, and we had broader definitions. Ultimately it doesn't matter what exist or didn't exist historically in linguistics, because the difference only exists in literary terms

>You don't even use punctuation. Come back when you stop talking like a nigger, and we can discuss that.
It's 4chan you silly fuck. So you're not going to tell me then?

>Again, you're imagining. People do all sorts of things without there being any chance of a "return", and quite often it's not "empathy"
People don't take actions that risk their lives unless there are very strong underlying, biological motivations, and "just entertainment lol" doesn't cut it

>justice
Yes, and "justice" has the exact same evolutionary underpinnings. The strongest sense of justice is ofc when we have been wronged, but we can also experience it on behalf of others, in those cases in which we can place ourselves in the situation of that person. What else did you think justice is?

I'm sorry for calling you dumb right out the gate. Really, I am. But no, the granularity is wrong in that it makes it out to be two, entirely separate concepts, when really they are just on a spectrum

>>515540519 (OP)
He was a ziocuck so didn’t understand the lines being fed to him or why he partially agreed with them.
Kikes say that to excuse their subhuman behavior and perverse dealings with those who have no ill will towards them, the world at large, and even their understanding of the all of the above + within and without.
Kirk agreed most likely because he could sense that kikes and their nigger brained foid golems bastardize the ward without knowing its meaning to whatever ends they “feel” aid them.
>tldr kike feeds shit to npc golem, npc interprets it based on pozzed kosher programming
>can’t tell its fetid kike shit, malfunctions due to confusing in competing subversive influence

>>515542713
Based subhuman roach with internet access

>>515548552
Why did this dude give up on the Change My Mind You Liberal College Fucks shtick?

>>515559253
>These two things are relying on the exact same underlying mechanism.
No. They aren't. But your thinking has been corrupted, and you'll insist they are the same thing because you can no longer think clearly. Anything that could (in your mind) prove an important distinction would undermine empathy, and undermining empathy means your empathy is no longer a valuable personal quality, meaning you're no longer the awesome person who is always empathetic. So, a hundred times per second while discussing the subject, your brain interrupts and you swoop to the "oh no, don't undermine empathy" branch of code, and each time that happens you increment the register that monitors your perceived absurdity of such distinctions. Before your finger even hits the first key in your mouth-breathing imbecilic response, you've already decided they are the same thing.

Nothing I or anyone else can do can ever change this. You're no longer a thinking being in the same way as I am, or most of the other people here are. The brainwashing is permanent, and debilitating.

>Because for most of history, language wasn't as complex,
You've never once read a poem, or at least not any written in the deep past. Never heard a fucking riddle. Jesus fucksticks.

>People don't take actions that risk their lives unless
People risk their fucking lives all the time, for the most trivial and idiotic of reasons. Often enough, for no reason at all. I've seen people risk not only their own lives, but the additional lives of multiple strangers because they can't wait an extra 3 seconds to make the safe left turn. They did that for impatience and boredom.

>Yes, and "justice" has the exact same evolutionary underpinnings.
Breaking News from Leftoidland: All words mean the same thing, and that meaning is "Vote for Blue no matter what!"

>>515540519 (OP)
>>515550149

>>515560788
That's Crowder's thing not Kirk you dipshit

>>515557232
>But, in those circumstances, you would only have empathy for your tribe, for close kin even
Celts and Slavs were closer culturally and aesthetically to Vikings than Moors and yet the Vikings still sold them to the Moors as slaves. In the early days of the USA, Ben Franklin didn't even consider most Europeans to be White. Today our concept of our tribe is a product of the time we live in. Historically it would've been our closest kin, nowadays Sven from Sweden and Nigel from England are both the same tribe (race) despite being on completely different sides of the continent. The "White" race has come to mean anything from Italian to Irish to German and Spanish.

As said before, empathy is an outdated concept we just cannot rationalize anymore, it's entirely arbitrary. Modern society wants us to treat our countrymen as our tribe but we share countries with rabid niggers and muslims that want to kill us. This is why people are returning to race based tribalism, but that's almost just as bad, because there's plenty of retarded leftist Whites and traitors that share nothing with us culturally.

>>515540519 (OP)
If you don't have empathy at least for your in-group, it's very likely you're a psychopath.

The more I see people interact with this quote and >>515547531
this pic, the more I realize the average person is a moron, with limited critical thinking

>>515563728
You don't need that made up bullshit to do what's right for your group.

>>515561027
>Nothing I or anyone else can do can ever change this. You're no longer a thinking being in the same way as I am, or most of the other people here are. The brainwashing is permanent, and debilitating.
Well, that's a great cop out to not have to address a single issue raised in the post. Are you sure that every single word in your post wasn't just projection? That you don't know why you think that empathy and sympathy are separate concepts, just that you do, and now that you've been called out on it and your reasoning has been found wanting (so wanting you couldn't even respond lmao), your ego demands that you sperg about it in this way?

>You've never once read a poem, or at least not any written in the deep past. Never heard a fucking riddle
Your reading comprehension is terrible desu. Do you want me to put the "as" part in bold next time? Do you not understand that I was saying that the complexity of language has steadily climbed over time, not that it wasn't complex at any time in the past, or couldn't express complex or beautiful ideas? Like a single look at any estimates of vocabulary sizes today vs the past will show you what I mean

>I've seen people risk not only their own lives, but the additional lives of multiple strangers because they can't wait an extra 3 seconds to make the safe left turn
But that action does have a reward, especially since the drawoff doesn't even exist in people's heads when they do this, so you'll have to try again

>Breaking News from Leftoidland: All words mean the same thing, and that meaning is "Vote for Blue no matter what!"
Once again, afraid of engaging with the argument. Bit sad

>>515561027
Anyway because I'm such an empath I'll let you know you don't need to spend the next 10 minutes trying to contort yourself to force out a reply because I'm going to bed and the thread will be 404 when I'm up. I didn't mean to offend you and I was a little quick to call you dumb right off the bat. It still stands that evolutionary, it's the exact same mechanism. PERHAPS the separation linguistically has a place to points on this spectrum, but even as that they are pretty clunky terms, and are clearly not being used for that