>>515578287
It doesn't cause that from "whizing" by especially because it didn't whiz by. It impacted him, it didn't fly by. It would take a moment for the air to catch up. Put a crumped piece of paper and wave you hand by, it doesn't move till a moment afterwards. The shirt moved first in the video. You are talking about something small and totally aerodynamic. If it was staged they would have used a blank, the risk of it bouncing off and hitting someone else is too high. The shirt moves upwards and in a way that could only happen if something was pushing up from inside the shirt.
>>515578696
Like look at this guy, he sees what i'm talking about but instead of believing his own eyes he does mental gymnastics to force his narrative to fit. Don't be that guy. The shirt moved up then back down because the thing that was pulling it up passed through so gravity pulled it back down. Pull your shirt up like that, let go, it's instant. You can see the spot on the shirt where it passed through.
I know it's more fun to pretend it's like a movie and come up with wacky conspiracies, but this isn't it. Who did it and why, that's what's important. It clearly happened, 100s if not thousands of people were there. To claim this is fake is beyond retarded. We don't have any practical effects like this, they don't exist. If we did they would be used in movies. It looks weird because it's not something were used to seeing and we expect it to be like a movie.