Thread 515603337

For the one asking for me for the archives of the book ASIN and ISBN pertaining to Charlie Kirk's book about his death, here:

https://archive.ph/Ui25f
>isbnsearch
https://archive.is/3xbF5
>bookfinder
https://archive.is/ViBU4
>bookscouter

ISBN & ASIN of other sites

https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K
>Amazon waybackmachine archive, not mine. Shows the publishing date being the 9th when his death occurred on the 10th. however, ISBN and ASIN lookup sites show inconsistent publishing dates like 11th and 10th being the dates so I don't know if that's the time they grabbed the book via amazon's API or it's a new ASIN number issued by amazon; i dont know. I just know these sites that catalog books use these codes and their not consistent with their publishing dates.

one site i couldnt get to archive was:

>https://isbndb.com/book/9798264842788

cloudflare verification is probably not allowing archive.is to get it, i get a not found error when trying to grab it. so all i can do is post a screenshot and someone else can archive it or if they want to register, they can to get the details; image is of said site.

the original amazon link to the book is here from the waybackmachine.

>>515603337 (OP)
>the waybackmachine archive showing the 9th being the date of publishing and the ASIN code

https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K

>bookfinder supposedly doesnt have a publish date besides the year

https://archive.is/3xbF5

>>515603805
>image didnt attach, my bad.

>>515603337 (OP)
Bumping for effort. But to play jews advocate for one moment.
This early date thing happened during Sandy Hook too and one might think they couldn't still be this fucking strupid...could they?

>>515605159
>stupid
Anon shared that image in another thread.
>author ajc
>jewish criminal org ajc

its not a real book (yet)
you cannot actually buy it and read it
its something generated almost instantly
every time something happens this type of shit gets made, in order to gauge interest by sellers and the public

see: independently published

>>515605159
mistakes happen, humans arent infallible. whomever was responsible for this could of set the date incorrectly and once they knew they fucked up, they took it down but not before someone archived the listing.