Thread 515695396

Second shooter not zoomed in

https://files.catbox.moe/0ars3z.mp4

Zoomed in

https://files.catbox.moe/3szqwl.mp4

The two guys (grey/white shirt who made the shooting motion and black shirt with cap next to him)

https://files.catbox.moe/3f4n82.mp4

Right shoulder of Charlie (:18 collar bone area hit)

https://files.catbox.moe/5r5zh7.mp4

>>515695396 (OP)
>black shirt with cap
Is your theory this guy is second shooter? The vid from the pic on OP has moments before (when they begin fleeing the scene after kirk dies) where his face is full display on the camera. He got a funny schnoz (not as big as (((theirs))) but funny still).

>>515696571
He’s got a jewfro as well

>>515696866
Your vids aren't oading here or I'd give timestamp of his face on full display, but again, right after the shot, when people begin running past the camera on OP's pic, you can see his face sideways as he runs past. And near this scene of hiding behind the, I think you can see his face again. Why OP chose the back of the head pic is beyond me.

Because it shows both of them. The guy on the left with the white/grey shirt is the one in the semi weaver stance like you would if you were holding a firearm and then has a kickback the moment charlie is hit. The guy in the black shirt may know him. This is the only pic showing both of them. Yes, you can see the black shirt guy directly on but I don't know if he was involved. The white/grey shirt definitely is a second shooter.

reuplod of the two guys

https://files.catbox.moe/t5u6l3.mp4

The first two videos do load, I just used an in private browser and no issues loading them.

>>515695396 (OP)
that's pretty wild, sure looks like it, vid 3 isn't loading

>>515698003
What's up with that? What am I supposed to notice here? Looks like people running for cover.

>>515697681
>kickback
is not hard to mimic. just because the timing matched the real shot doesn’t mean it was him - also if that guy did take a shot from that range charlie’s body would have reacted to the force resulting in additional lateral motion, not just straight back (as though hit from the front). to be clear, i’m not doubting the second shooter theory, but what i saw was a glownigger only pantomiming a long gun seconds before the shot was taken, likely to signal to the other shooter(s) to take the shot.

3rd video with people running is the black shirt guy with a hat just to the right of the white/gray shirt guy second shooter. At the end they meet by the car. If you don't know what you are seeing with the first two videos, I can't help you, you must be blind.

It's not seconds, it's literally milliseconds before Charlie's body reacted. There is also a puff of smoke at the very last couple of frames. Watch it near the guy's back shoulder where his arm is cocked, it is there.

>>515698851
if he's scope in he's not going to have that guy in his sight picture

>>515698851
also if you rewatch the slow motion replay, the “kickback” happens wayyy before charlie’s body reacts. would have been near instantaneous at that range, even in slow motion (also people in that immediate area would have reacted to a shot that close but nobody flinches or ducks or anything)

>>515695396 (OP)
Yeah I've been convinced from the start that white shirt fired a gun.

This guy was spotted running with a gun without a shirt.

>>515699291
>puff of smoke
i saw that too. initially i thought smoke but it’s way too blurry and brief to be definitive about it. could easily be the shirt of someone moving behind him.
not trying to argue, you just seem really sure about this without a lot to go on (your perception is not a source video).
my recommendation is collect more videos for analysis before making conclusions about the three you posted - for example, the las vegas incident had multiple vids of different shooters, with muzzle flashes and everything, to the extent that different local news outlets reported multiple shooters and people who were there and claimed there were multiple shooters started getting silenced. none of that here, just two vids with some interesting edits and conjecture

also if you rewatch the slow motion replay, the “kickback” happens wayyy before charlie’s body reacts. would have been near instantaneous at that range, even in slow motion (also people in that immediate area would have reacted to a shot that close but nobody flinches or ducks or anything)

Not if the 30.06 rang out the same time, which would have been MUCH louder. You seem sure that this motion is a coincidence within milliseconds of Charlie's body reacting