This is how I know the shooter was right wing
Anonymous
(ID: dPyTTmGk)
9/12/2025, 11:51:17 PM
No.515759013
>>515759431
Those two are not mutually exclusive
Anonymous
(ID: QdY1smE9)
9/12/2025, 11:51:53 PM
No.515759096
>>515758781 (OP)
nbc news reported that he registered as a non-partisan voter.
what now?
Anonymous
(ID: i1i7DOXZ)
9/12/2025, 11:54:36 PM
No.515759431
>>515759013
>Those two are not mutually exclusive
FPBP. /thread
>>515758781 (OP)
>This is how I know the shooter was right wing
Retarded logical fallacy. This is how I know OP is a leftard.
Anonymous
(ID: b61oOQEo)
9/12/2025, 11:56:23 PM
No.515759654
>>515758781 (OP)
lol BPD Nancy will be full "how did this poor, sweet innocent boy get corrupted so fast" because that is the only way her broken black-and-white brain could process one of her team doing a lil purging
Anonymous
(ID: fv0C1i5g)
9/12/2025, 11:59:43 PM
No.515760077
>>515758781 (OP)
>my opinions are based on some woman's twatter.
Then you are too stupid to be allowed to breed.
Anonymous
(ID: iqam4tI2)
9/13/2025, 12:06:10 AM
No.515760983
>Pray for his soul
>Remove the threat from society
It's a difficult question, sort of.
In another world, the death penalty is not separate from compassion.
However, with the possibility of successful life imprisonment, it's a different story.
With the perspective that there's an afterlife, the killer should have the time to cleanse his soul and prepare himself for what comes next.
With that being said, theologically and even ethically there's a fork in the road here.
From one technically speaking side, if you allow him confession / mass to forgive his mortal sins, he's able to be redeemed spiritually and killing him isn't that big of a deal from the perspective of the prisoner's soul.
Arguably it's better to repent for X years in jail before he dies so his purgatory time is lessened, but we don't know how that works so shrug.
But it's the "moral" thing t do from a Christian perspective to allow them the time they need to realize their sin and repent.
As well, even if it's state sponsored, whoever has a hand in executing the man has sin on his hands as the execution is unnecessary with the possibility of life imprisonment available.
Taking a step away from spirituality and now purely ethically speaking, prison shouldn't be about punishment but rehabilitation. It's meant to separate threats from society, sure, but what if the individual truly repents? If he's no longer a threat to society and seeks to atone, there's no reason to keep him locked up (at taxpayer expense on top of that).
Little difference in a man who got sucked into a rabbit hole of craziness online vs. the man who walked into his wife having an affair. Remove the influencing element and they wouldn't have done it (compare to a man who killed for pleasure, he would have regardless if he decided to cross the line once).
I don't mind if you go a step further and say that the above should only be considered in a homogeneous society of one's own kin.
