>>515807109 (OP)
Its what the CIA wants. The CIA is heavily embedded in American media so when you see a story reported on from the start you can expect a narrative play out.
Notice the hohol girl that got stabbed in the neck got complete radio silence? No narrative so no air time. The Kirk shooter was at the very least known if not groomed so they ran it and will continue to run it. If Kirk was shot by a black you'd hear nothing whatsoever and that would be the case from the beginning. If the CIA wasn't involved at all but the shooter happened to be convenient to a narrative you'd get silence but then wall to wall coverage once they figure out the perp is useful political fodder. These differences in the way they report not what they report are key because they can hide the truth but they can't hide the way they operate.
>they can hide the truth but they can't hide the way they operate
^ This is important so I'll reiterate: the media has a pattern of behavior that reveals their intent. Anyone can decode it with the simple methodology I described. If the event is manufactured it is spread from the start. If the event is useful but not manufactured it is ignored but then blasted when its usefulness becomes apparent. If an event is neither it is ignored or suppressed entirely. American media is not meant to spread news it is meant to strategically misinform.