>>515962626
Let me elaborate for you since you don’t seem to be grasping the point.
If survival of the fittest means survival of those best suited to their environment, and the environment is a toxic world dominated by paper money and luck, then what sort of humans will be surviving?
In the past when money didn’t exist, those best suited to their environment were strong, fit and could provide. This environment ensured that the following generations were physically well built and strong.
In today’s world, the ones best suited to their environment are the richest. This means docile officer workers, wage slaves and greedy money addicted fat cats like corporate CEO’s with questionable genetics will be reproducing.
Do you understand now?
So the ones best suited to their environment today are going to have drastically different DNA to the ones best suited to the environment 1,000 years ago, which means the established reproductive environment over thousands of generations has been changed dramatically due to the monetary system, which is why you are seeing an increase in strange looking children from the next generations who commit mass murders and so on.
We have disallowed the fittest of our species survival and allowed the richest to thrive instead, as those are the ones best suited to our disgusting environment.