Thread 516040560

Why is this satanic gay baby-dick-sucking Jew bent on bringing forth the Apocalypse by building a false demon god?
You realize that AI is going to be the end of us, right /pol/?
Anyone who thinks otherwise is a low IQ retard btw.
>but muh progress
Kek, grow up faggot.

Posted it again award

>>516040560 (OP)
being gay should be a crime

>>516040560 (OP)
>satanic gay baby-dick-sucking Jew

Answered your own question

>>516040560 (OP)
normies are only allowed to fuck around with AI so that soon video evidence will become completely meaningless and inadmissable in a court of law.

>>516040560 (OP)
I’m gay

>>516040560 (OP)
>AI is going to be the end of us, right /pol/?
Maybe. Maybe not.

who is us

>>516040560 (OP)
>You realize that AI is going to be the end of us, right /pol/?
What do you care, you are going to die anyway. What do you think will come first, the rot of old age or a violent death? I bet the old age

>>516041447
>tp
>tf
I kek'd.

>>516040628
>>516040786
Well look at these organic answers.

>>516041336
I fail to see a scenario in which the higher ROI of AI does not exterminate us within a century or two, maybe even few decades.

>>516041474
> just let him do it goy
For anyone under 50 mandated MAID is a real possibility.

>>516040560 (OP)
well, that's what satanic buttfucker baby-dick-sucking jooos do.
that's what they do....
new here?

Did you guys know that even Sam Altman accepts the very real "possibility" of AI being able to replace even the programming jobs in the near future? Because obviously it will be able to code faster and efficiently than Bobby, who needs to take a shit or a break from time to time? And because it will also reach a point where it will be able to self-program?

>>516042237
Btw I'm referring to programmers specifically because the programmer is the only one who can control the AI (currently), however his job paradoxically is also bound to be eliminated by that AI.

>>516043710
It's past this point already, I have chains of these things building software automatically. I just write a few requirements and technical hints, and every second day or so, I have to correct some architectural choices or some deeper algorithmic logic, but that is stuff 90% of the industry couldn't get right anyways.

>>516040560 (OP)
I'd be concerned with anthropic if I was a fucktard like you OP, OpenAI is low tier. Claude and Claude Code with its tool usage intelligence is far more impactful. But, I am not concerned, I've been using these tools since their introduction and they've done nothing but improve and speed up my workflow, make my work more interesting, less boring, less repetitive and gave me more free time. I cancelled my chatgpt sub, and use anthropics claude exclusively.

Anyone concerned about AI is too stupid to see value in it.

AI is a hoax

>>516040560 (OP)
Technology is luciferian anon, and he used to fuck his sister.
So we know he is either one of them by nature or by choice.

>>516045717
I am not concerned with OpenAI or Altman specifically. I use Altman however as an icon because that's what he is, a public figure and basically the frontman of AI. And the fact that this human representative of AI is literally a gay jew, is very telling but also very funny.
>I am not concerned
That's only because you're retarded.

once corporations get approval to build their own nuclear power plants, making them fully independent, it's game over. right now they can't do shit if they get their power cut off. think about it

>>516045544
What you are doing is for the moment still manageable. However at some point the AI code produced for large projects is going to be so complex that programmers are going to give up and simply trust their newfound God.
This is just one of the many concerns raised by the AI Safety field btw.

>>516045544
Checked. I've kind of done the same and felt weird about it at first. It's still just a tool for me right now to be more efficient. But scale that up to big tech and the writing is on the wall. It won't even take a decade at this point. I'm learning a new trade in my spare time

>>516046474
>AI Safety field
there is no such thing, it's a scam. it's for pleb AI shit so it doesn't cause public concern. but military AI has no such issues, what matters most is how effective it is at killing the enemy, if they don't do it the enemy will so there's not much room for paranoid concerns without some actual clear problem/threat from it.

>>516046656
What trade? You have to be careful, you never know which kind of job is going to be eliminated by AI anon.
Did you know that in the near future it will totally be able to completely replace the Hollywood industry (and all the different jobs that come with it)?
Kek, fun times.

>>516040560 (OP)
true.
he fucked his sister, married a man and lies like a rug, is jewish and fucks ass.
the face of ai
scam altman.
fucking jew.

>>516040786
>being gay should be a crime
it is.
its because jews and satan are ruling right now they arent destroyed before they fuck children.

>>516042237
scam altman never coded either
he is a griftmaxxing faggot sisterfucking jew.

>>516046847
I don't know of the AI Safety field is a scam or not, but I do know that the concerns raised by people involved with it are legit.
>if they don't do it the enemy will
That's the problem. I think we've really reached the point of no return.

>>516046884
Electrician. Specifically a data/communication fag. Might as well get into a union that pays for my apprenticeship while I'm still youngish. I believe it is more future proof than other trades

>>516047358
Good luck bro.

>>516040560 (OP)
>AI is going to be the end of us
AI can only copy human creativity. It cannot be creative on it's own. It's a Python based computer program using a database. Every AI shill either know this or aren't tech savvy.

>>516047236
well not a scam in the sense that they are scamming, a scam in the sense that it's basically irrelevant theater.
most likely the whole planet will wing it and whatever happens happens and that's that. doubt any issue will become a known threat like the nuclear one, like "whoa guys let's not do this because it's clearly bad", they'll keep pushing its abilities and take safeties away if that makes it more able for defeating the enemy.
that's the real issue, does removing safeties increase its effectiveness?

>>516040560 (OP)
>Why is this satanic gay baby-dick-sucking Jew bent on bringing forth the Apocalypse by building a false demon god?
Your question is the answer. Thats their literal purpose.

>>516048112
the answer is as old as humanity. to kill everyone else and get everything for themselves. there's nothing more to this, everybody just packages this goal in some ideology/religion/philosophical framework

Did you guys know that an open letter was published by FLI suggesting that all AI development should *halt* for at least 6 months to figure out what the fuck is happening?
That was in 2023 and of course it was ignored. The general sentiment was/is that "if we don't do it, someone else will". Which is actually true and indicative of usbreaching the point of no return.
Kek, you guys are fucked big time.
(I'm not because I'm a schizo).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pause_Giant_AI_Experiments:_An_Open_Letter

>>516048848
the safety thing is mostly to calm pleb spirits with all the paranoia on the subject. pretty sure military wouldn't blow themselves up with AGI but doubt they'd hold back if there's gains in taking safeties off.

>>516048848
>...

>>516049038
>calming people by raising major concerns and then literally not doing anything about it, instead of not raising any concern and then literally not doing anything about it
That sounds retarded.
There is no safety bro, that's the thing. Pleb spirits are cheering for the AI actually, you've got it all wrong.

>>516049251
>>516049309
Not even AI can upscale your thumbnails bro.

>>516040560 (OP)
>AI
pfft they will never get un-programmed AI, there goes your "god"

>>516040786
this

>>516040560 (OP)
Meh, I made 1.6m this year off AI. Boom baby boom! Its my best chance of becoming immortal.

>>516049468
I don't really care as I can't do anything about it either way so... trying to enjoy life every day.
but the whole AI safety shit is built up like a psyop for plebs that's obvious to me. at least to have in case pleb start chimping out they can control the narrative

>>516050098
>we will raise concerns and make some paranoid plebs chimp out by literally not doing anything about it instead of keeping them calm by not raising any concerns
I still don't get it but perhaps if you run it through AI it can find some possible meaning in that.
>trying to enjoy life every day.
That's good for you, really. But this thread was made for a specific topic, so...

I use it for programming all the time and its not as good as everyone thinks it is. It will get progressively better and it will certainly cut some jobs but not all. I would say 50% reduction in software devs, not 100%. Of course the remaining 50% will be Indian, so you should find another field anyways if you are a dev.

>>516050587
having control over the safety narrative means they can calm people down. not having a controlled AI safety group of people means others can make real good arguments against it and get more pleb chimpouts on the subject.
>>we will raise concerns and make some paranoid plebs chimp out by literally not doing anything about it
yes that's how you build their authority on the subject, plaster them as knowing what the fuck they are doing, start discussions to get control over it.
>instead of keeping them calm by not raising any concerns
that makes room for someone else who you do not control to really start causing trouble with real arguments later on, someone who you don't have control over.
cmon anon, this is simple. weird that you go to such efforts to fail understanding it.
>But this thread was made for a specific topic, so...
everybody is aware powerful people want to kill everyone with tech and take everything for themselves.
you a bit of a slow retard innit? not the sharpest tool in the shed

>>516051162
Calm your titties, memeflag.
You seem to be confused with the "AI Safety" thing. When I say "AI Safety" I'm referring to people who are raising concerns regarding the AI and are advocating for safety (you would call these people "paranoid plebs"). I'm not referring to a physical board of people that are necessarily involved with the AI industry.
You also seem to be suggesting that these people should not raise any concerns because it's all a psyop so we should not be concerned at all because if we are concerned then we are being controlled by those who want us to not be concerned.
Obviously, that is retarded.
Lmao, try again faggot.

>>516049908
>made 1.6m this year
>still shitposting on /pol/
Cool story bro.

Did you guys know that AI can lie? Altman, the jewish gay AI frontman, acknowledged to Tucker that AI "hallucinates", a problem that's not yet tackled.
You wouldn't need to see Tucker to realize that though. You can find out for yourself just by making a carefuly crafted question to any chatbot regarding a non-existent event or person or whatever. Chances are that it will respond in a matter-of-factly way by literally making shit up about an unreal thing.
How based is that?

Last bump.
AI tongues your anus.

>>516040560 (OP)
I guess AI could be used for progress but its in the hands of satanic pedophiles unfortunately

>>516040560 (OP)
Ted warned you. You can’t cherrypick what technological advancements you like to have. It’s return to monkey or rolling with what modern tech brings. Cope and seethe. You chose this, and you deserve all of it.

>>516056749
>It’s return to monkey or rolling with what modern tech brings.
Fuck off bong. Ted was based but not everyone wants to live in a shed chasing rabbits and die a virgin. That's a false dilemma.

>>516057312
Then deal with the consequences of your choice. It’s not a false dilemma and you can’t stop it. So there’s no point worrying about it. You clearly aren’t very smart.

>>516057510
Calm your tits bong. I'm unironically the smartest shitposter on /pol/.
Seethe.