Thread 516042907

So I’ve been digging into the data and it actually looks like the covid vaccines were a lot safer than the consensus ever made them seem.
Billions of doses given worldwide.
Serious side effects = super rare (like 1 in tens of thousands to 1 in millions depending on type).
Most risks were caught and tracked, like myocarditis in young men or the clotting thing with AZ/J&J.
Long term? Nothing major has shown up after 3+ years of constant monitoring.
Meanwhile, the actual virus had a way higher chance of hospitalising or killing you, especially before Omicron.
So was the “anti-vax” panic way overblown? Or did the authorities shoot themselves in the foot by messaging it badly and making people think they were covering stuff up?
just asking because the consensus on here was panic inducing.

>myocarditis
>clotting
>Nothing majors
whatever helps you sleep

The vaccines didn't do anything, nothing bad nothing good. The governments around the world just wanted to inject people with cum because they wanted to see if they can get away with it

Source: i worked at the israeli plant where they milked palestinian's for their cum

>>516043061
yeah sure, horrible for those people who experienced that, but we're talking handfuls of cases per million people.

Even 1% side effects is a lot considering billions took that shit.

>>516043166
I agree, but we're talking 0.0001% or whatever
and they justify it by saying it was safer than getting covid more often.

>>516043166
1% of a billion is 10 million

>>516043246
Not really, where did you get those numbers from?

>>516043257
where have you got the 1% figure from though?

I still remember people here saying that everyone who took the vaccine would drop dead by 2022/23

>>516043307
all the latest studies m8 one sec

The covid vaccine was more dangerous than the virus if you were under the age of 40. For old people, the vaccine was the safer option. They should not have been forcing it on the young and able-bodied. I will never forgive them. I will never forget how my family and friends and employer treated me. I will never trust again. My trust in authority figures and the medical field was already shattered by the implications of my infant circumcision, and covid obliterated any chance of it recovering. I am prepared to leave everything behind and never speak to my "loved ones" again.

Totes got the flu shot

>>516043163
I personally know at least 2 people who had strokes at a young age after taking it, 1 who got a life threatening blood clot, 2 who died of sudden extreme cancers, and that's just that I can think of quickly off the top of my head. Go fuck yourself.

>>516043522
They fixed that

>>516042907 (OP)
It doesn't matter. COVID was a full-spectrum Jewish attack against America. Children were traumatized and their emotional growth stunted. Government abuses went unchecked while laws to protect the streets weren't enforced. Religious and medical freedom were under attack. White Christians were demonized and allowed to be oppressed.

And everybody knows it was Jews behind all this shit. The same Jews who now as we speak are waving the American flag to get their "Christian allies" willing to die for Israel again.

Maybe because most of it got labelled as long covid instead of vaccine side effect retard. Some people here in germany had to fight to get their vaccine injury recognized as one. Even people who died right after getting the jew juice were counted as covid deaths.

>>516043384
Did you see that Japanese study that looked at 18 million people and compared the vaccinated and unvaccinated?

>>516043333
Not 1% but 0.1%
"1 in 1,000 risk of heart inflammation (myocarditis) associated with Moderna’s and Pfizer-BioNTech’s mRNA COVID vaccines"
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/researchers-retract-viral-preprint-study-falsely-linked-high-risk-heart-inflammation-to?utm_source=chatgpt.com

>>516043246
>it was safer than getting covid more often.
But actually no, because catching covid without the vaccine taught your immune system to protect you better. Taking the vax only protected you against specific strains, and you'd get your shit wrecked by the next one anyway. Instead of being a boosterfaggot and panicking at each mutation, you could have just caught the original and been fine for the next five years.

>>516043608
So an illness from China was s jew trick?

>>516043307
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-ema-finds-possible-link-very-rare-cases-unusual-blood-clots-low-blood-platelets?

blood clots and platelets issue rarer than 1 in 10,000 so 0.01%

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332224000623?

5 cases per 100,000 vaccinated in “adult population exposed to mRNA vaccine” for myocarditis/pericarditis combined.

>>516043663
no, please post it.

>>516043672
That's what a vaccine does, gives you a small dose

>>516043720
Hm data

>>516043664
>In the past few weeks, anti-vaxxers have rallied behind a nonpeer-reviewed study by a group of Canadian researchers as evidence against COVID-19 vaccines. Turns out, the paper made a fatal mistake in reaching its conclusion.

Scientists at The University of Ottawa Heart Institute have retracted the preprint study, which falsely calculated a 1 in 1,000 risk of heart inflammation for Moderna's and Pfizer-BioNTech's mRNA COVID vaccines.


The study authors have withdrawn the manuscript “because of a major error pertaining to the quoted incidence data,” the team said in a retraction statement on Sept. 24.
bro did you not read your link?

>>516043815
Not the covid vaccine

This anti vax narrative is a psyop to make disease kill more of the population.

>>516043672
That's what I did, I'm not vaxxed, I'm just curious if I fell for pols bullshit considering there doesn't seem to be a massive health scare since.
also a few friends got vaxxed and are curious.

>>516042907 (OP)
The same technology will cure cancer and honestly I hope that christcvcks don’t get it

>>516043879
This

>>516043853
>Hm data
what does that mean?

>>516043522
I personally know an entire palliative care ward that has passed away since the first vaxx came out. It’s disgusting that we allow this to happen and let the government hide the truth

>>516043333
Where are you getting the safe and effective from?
They said it was 100% effective against transmission, and it turned out they never even tested for that?
What more do you fucking clowns need?
How many injections did you take to prevent you from getting covid, and how many times did you get covid?
You're all fucking mental, and dying suddenly is the best possible end you have coming.
Boost up

>>516044047
People who have chronic issues needs the vax more than normal healthy people.

>>516044047
So you caught OG covid or something close to it, weren't vaxed, didn't die, presumably weren't crippled by some long term health condition or else you'd have mentioned it. And you still fear that you "fell for /pol/'s bullshit?"
You came out on top. You took our advice and won.

>>516044116
yeah do you remember that it came out that 97% of the adverse effects came from a tiny number of the over all batches, like 4% if I remember correctly. Which is still disgusting, but I'm just concerned about everyone in general.

>>516043720
>1 in 10,000 so 0.01%
>5 cases per 100,000 vaccinated
That's a lot.

>>516043351
Nice flag (((anon))).
The only 'people' that said everyone that took the shots would be dead by 2022 are the same people that pushed the red deer.
As in you fake glowy cunts.

>>516044214
Fall for the rosecrucian guidelines to keep the population low activation psyop

>>516044330
And we are not even talking about the cancers and the less severe side effects which are also life altering because they turn chronic.

>>516044282
perhaps, either that or I isolated myself from society and lost out on jobs and shit for no real reason?

>>516043777
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40416011/

>>516044398
You're healthy now, as you age it'll change. Don't fall for the kabbalah death cult psyop

>>516043664
>?utm_source=chatgpt.com
"Jarvis, find me an article I can pretend to have read that makes me look right"

>>516044543
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095670/

>>516044396
You were wrong

>>516044068
Do you think it will go through clinical trials or will they just 'wing it' like with the covid vaxx?

>>516043713
What the Fuck are you even doing here except kike tricks?
Money, you fucking shill, money.

>>516042907 (OP)
So you are a paid shill desperately trying to pump Moderna stock but this is a complete waste of time.
Go back to reddît they absolutely love that mRNA shit.

>>516042907 (OP)
>the covid vaccines were a lot safer than the consensus

>>516044705
I curse you in the name of Jesus. Silence

>>516044744
Redditers are alive and kicking

>>516044116
>I personally know an entire palliative care ward that has passed away
That's not even English you dumb fuck. Vatniks deserve to go to Hell.

>>516044913
Chronic elderly? What a shock.

>>516044613
from the same study

Any upper respiratory blight cause cause pneumonia in the elderly

>>516042907 (OP)

> the actual virus had a way higher chance of hospitalising or killing you,

That fucking virus had almost a zero chance of putting you in the hospital.

>>516045042
Don't believe you

>>516042907 (OP)
>died suddenly
ok

>>516045159
Only if you were suffering from a chronic condition

>>516044011
Yeah, that's it.

>>516042907 (OP)
It’s been 5 years. MOVE ON FAGGOT!

>>516045042
right ok, I appreciate this data, hopefully all those people get their deserved compensation

now I want to focus on the long term effects for people who didn't experience overt side effects. There the idea going around that all vaccine recipients are under heightened cancer risk, is this based on anything concrete?

>>516045287
It is. May you get shingles. Don't get the shingles shot. Get over it naturally

>>516045329
MOVE ON FAGGOT!

>>516045491
no fuck off

>>516042907 (OP)
Checking the endless streams of "died of suddenly" is kinda tedious, so:
If you are cincerely interested.
Check all causes mortality
Check disease commonality per year
Note the obvious and absolutely clear change after first covid-19 vaccine innoculation dates.

And if you dont, its obvious you are a glowie or useless sheep.

>>516045491
Bump

>>516045531
Older people with chronic conditions tend to get cancer too.

>>516044047
Do you think the people that convinced 85% of the world's population to take experimental injections for a disease where the average death rate was older than the average death rate of EVERYONE, are going to tell you that you fucked up for trusting them?
Keep watching the news bud, I'm sure you'll know exactly what you need to.

>>516045594
bro I don't even know how to do that shit, I'm not a glowie, please spoon feed me like the baby I am.

>>516042907 (OP)
it was still wrong to force people to take it in order to stay employed or at school. it was still wrong to shut down the economy to save a bunch of old people. also the vaccine is more dangerous to you than the virus if you're less than 50 years old with no health conditions

>>516042907 (OP)
Tell this shit to all my neighbours who "mysterious die" by heart attack, and off course they are all be replaced by niggers

>>516045670
For normal people

>>516045201
I couldn't care less.
>>516045329
The problems is that many countries don't want to release data comparing unvaccinated and vaccinated populations. The one that did like Japan and a few others are showing a concerning trend regarding the vaccinated.
>now I want to focus on the long term effects for people who didn't experience overt side effects
Well that's the problem on giving something that hasn't been tested for long term side effects, previous vaccines were tested for 5/8/10 years + for a reason. Because you can never know, it's a novel platform.
>There the idea going around that all vaccine recipients are under heightened cancer risk, is this based on anything concrete?
One of the things it's based on is that the spike protein keeps replicating in their body years after they got the shot despite them telling us that's not the case. The least it could do is destroy your immune system because the spike is always attacking it. Other concerns are that it integrates into your dna. I'm not home rn so I can't post all the links I've saved.

>>516045597
Bump

>>516045809
Because it proves you wrong

Have you learned and faced the TRUTH about Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccines???

If not, are you prepared to face and handle the TRUTH when you learn it???

MANY will not be.

A FEW will be.

The FEW will be needed to help the MANY understand and accept the TRUTH.

>>516045722
I know heart attacks are trending up, but they blame that on a few different factors and when it comes to Covid they say the virus leaves people with a heightened risk and nothing about the vaccine.
I'm willing to listen, are there any studies or a causal link that back you up?

>>516045329
Excess RNA fragments or some shit and plasmoids/genetic contaminants in every vial tested. Was study posted on here about it a few weeks ago

Did the pharmaceutical companies at some point in time swap out and replace President Trump’s “vaccine” with “mRNA vaccines???”

The olde jew reach around hustle. Don't take the vax. Reduce population.

>>516045882
k

>>516043522
You don't, you don't have friends or family stop lying anon

>>516045972
yeah no shit, this is what this is all about.
I'm unvaxxed and confused, I'm friends with a lot of people who are vaxxed and also confused.
please go ahead and tell us the truth
and also if you've got anything, how to medically help those who took the vax and are worried about long term effects.

*get measles naturally
*watch kids die
Durrrrrrr

>>516045999
Yeah, if the polish anon was here he would immediately give sources and explain.

The issue was always that vitamin D, not being fat, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and zinc were all good prophylactics and even were useful when administered very early on. And yet those were shat on by the establishment. Meanwhile remdesivir and the vaxxes all had terrible actual science behind them, and the establishment sucked their collective nuts.

>>516045809
>previous vaccines were tested for 5/8/10 years + for a reason.

And they were 86ed based on much lower rates of adverse events than the covid vaxx.

Even then there were concerns because the specific schedules weren't tested for any kind of interactions.

>Because you can never know, it's a novel platform.

It might actually never be seriously tested now.

It's like how they say we'll never fully understand the health impact of micro-plastics because there are no control groups to compare it to.

>>516046216
You mean a healthy immune system. Perish the thought.

Lol ivermectin

>>516044398
Nobody wants to live on a planet over populated by 8 billion, 10 billion, 12 billion all consuming mutts, not the mutts, not the billionaires.
The planet will die before population gets controlled naturally (because natural control will be humans exterminating humans and everything else in the process), and in the meantime the fastest extinction event on the archeological record is happening as we read this psyop bullshit.

Covid was them doing something about it.
Because no one was forced.
Everyone that took it took it willingly, or have it to their kids willingly.
So when children of men becomes a reality in 10-20 years, you'll have forgotten all about this.
We won't.
But you will.
Boost up.
If you'vestopped taking the shots for any reason, you're as antiscience as the craziest antivaxxer.
You're just a lot slower on the uptake.
Kek.

>>516046182
I'll repost this thread some other time, hopefully he'll catch it.

>>516046465
Thank you for admitting the truth.

I rest my case

>>516046271
>It might actually never be seriously tested now.
I think they tested it, I've never seen a "vaccine" tested on billions of people before.

>>516042907 (OP)
The mass die-off was always a meme. The current death rate is lower than 1%. Even after weakened immune systems and aggressive cancers
no more than 5-10% will be culled from this psyop. In the future there will be other opportunities to trim 5-10%
from the herd. With that said:

COVID was the self replicating Q AI and the vaxx helped deliver it.
>over 70% of the worlds population has been inoculated with the [Q]uantum AI
>13.4 billion doses administered
Now we just wait for them to roll out the new technohomo system and hook up all the cattle to it along with all the IoT devices before the inevitable.
Many of the unvaxxed will line up for the boosters once UBI and other benefits are announced.
The masses will also line up for any future brain implant augmentations.

Dipshits fell for it

>>516046595
now this is the real shit, but please give me more detail.

>>516044644
I was right, to trust my instinct, right in the knowledge that taking an experimental shot after I had already had the disease would be fucking retarded.
14 months in the wild with an R value of 2+ means 80%+ of everyone on the planet had already been infected before the clot shots came out.

I trusted my innate immune system.

You trusted the $billion pharmaceutical industry and all the corrupted politicians and msm instead, and sacrificed your innate immune in the process.
Boost up.
You will always need to.
And I never will.
Kek

>>516045988
No, but I got niggers in my neighbours and the are real, and the ex neighbours are under 6feet

>>516044827
Oh look, a kike using the lords name in vain.
Who knew.

>>516047138
Damn, that's a lot.

>>516045328
Why are you here, if you've moved on?

>>516043163
>trust us the vax is safe
>ok, it only fucks up a small percentage of people
> trust us the data is accurate
Next they’ll say
>ok the data is fucked up, but it doesn’t mean every vial will kill you, only maim
Didn’t take it so I don’t have to worry. Good luck with that.

>>516046588
I hope someone is collecting real data on it, but it's not at all like a real clinical trial.

We know the possible range of error is enormous. After all they were completely certain it was 100% effective at preventing all infection and transmission of covid when it was first mandated, but now they say it doesn't prevent infection or transmission at all (and most people anecdotally know it doesn't work from personal experience). So they claim it's only dangerous to a few percent of people who took it, but really it could have harmed every single person who took it, and we'd only know if real data was collected and made public.

>>516042907 (OP)
It was overblown because
1. /pol/ doesn't understand biology and
2. /pol/ cannot interpret statistics

>>516044495
>I isolated myself from society and lost out on jobs and shit for no real reason?
No, that part happened because the leaders of society forced it on us.

>>516042907 (OP)
a lot of the product they shipped out was saline solution of flu vaccine. they were not able to produce all the doses they needed so they shipped fake product.

>>516045487
Isn't shingles a side effect from that 'safe and effective' you took? And that's just the ones they told you about?
Not before you injected it 3 times though.
Kek.
Better take another booster.

>>516047384
The problems is countries refuse to release the data. There is a lab in Australia that had collected 200k blood vials from vaccinated and now a court is trying to destroy the lab and the evidence "because we don't need it anymore", again, I'm not home so I can't post the links but if you look it up it might come in google.

wrong https://slaynews.com/news/scientist-sounds-alarm-exposes-deadly-covid-vaccine-side-effects-scrubbed-federal-data/

>>516044068
You can take whatever you want. There's no such thing as communal medicine.

>>516045594
If they were interested in looking, they wouldn't be here, they'd be stringing up the doctors and nurses that injected them already.

>>516043815
mrna "vaccines" dont work like regular vaccines. they work by hijacking your mitochondria and forcing it to make chunks of protein that mimic physical parts of the virus

>>516043351
Multiple relatives of mine got cancer after taking it.
Unusual aggressive ones.

>>516042907 (OP)
>Meanwhile, the actual virus had a way higher chance of hospitalising or killing you,

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data and it actually looks like the covid vaccines were a lot safer
looks like? what happened to the experts and trust the (((science)))

>>516045988
A lot of things are trending up.
And nobody even wonders why nobody is even looking at the injections?

The human species has really hit a wall, hasn't it.

>>516042907 (OP)
There is literally nothing wrong with the COVID vaccine.

>>516045999
I have it on my other computer.
It doesn't matter, the shills aren't here to learn, they're here to demoralize.
The fun thing is you know they're fully boosted for shekels.
Talk about a funny joke.

>>516042907 (OP)
It steals your soul so you can't get to heaven. How are you measuring that?

>>516048187
>There is literally nothing wrong with the COVID vaccine.
are you science negationist

>>516044543
full text
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095670/
it's really more like an opinion essay, though there is interesting info in it.

>>516042907 (OP)
>Meanwhile, the actual virus had a way higher chance of hospitalising or killing you
Wrong. Young healthy people had no risk from covid which is why some countries stopped even recommending it for them. The risks weren't as crazy as some said but they were more severe than the govt let on. They downplayed myocarditis and forced people to take the risk, then when it ended up killing a bunch of kids in their sleep, they said the failure was in not informing them of the risk. Idea being if you were informed you could decline the vax, of course omitting they forced people to take it precisely because they knew the risk and didn't want to take it. Nevermind the myriad of other potential heart issues and blood clots

But no it was not some mass murder device they just didn't care if you oops died

>>516046178
If you took the vax, you're fucked.
Covid was released from a bioweapon lab in China to get people to take the clot shots. That's it, that's all.
The shots were the weapon, anyone with a grade 10 biology education knows that you can't immunize people against the flu, or the cold, which is all covid is.
So best case scenario, you're now beholden to big pharm keeping you alive every 'flu' season for the rest of their lives.
But overpopulation is what they're worried about. Why on earth would people believe they wouldn't do something about it?
You're looking at herd management.
Simple, effective, and humane.
Because they did it to themselves.

>>516044047
/pol/ is more than one person
but anyway you chose not to take a shot based on a novel untested technology that was rushed through safety trials and you're fine. imagine if you had taken it and then you had to spend the rest of your life wondering if it fucked you up in some way you can't see.

>>516046181
Families used to bring their kids together to catch measles so that they didn't have to be inconvenienced by their kids catching it slowly.
You've allowed big pharm to destroy the health of your kids, and you're stupid enough to be convinced they're actually saving you.
Just take your boosters already.

>>516042907 (OP)
>messaging it badly and making people think they were covering stuff up
This

>>516046216
They canceled the use of anything that might have been usable as a treatment, and barred a bunch of nurses and doctors practicing medicine again for even trying to administer vitamin d, only to make people wait a year for a vaccine they later changed the definition of vaccine to a treatment for.
People are broken, things are going to get so much worse, and there's no fixing it, and no fixing them.

>>516046560
Seriously, if you think I'm even bothering to pay attention to what your case is, you're fucking retarded.
Boost up, I hear covid season is coming back, only for you, not for us.
Yay innate immune system.

>>516042907 (OP)
the antivaxers are constantly reposting headlines from shill sites that sell vitamins and try to get ad clicks that there's people dying all over the place, when that's simply not the case.

they cherry pick info like countries that had increases in deaths, while ignoring those who had decreases. they ignore data like countries that were more vaccinated having fewer non-covid deaths than low-vaccinated countries having many times more excess non-covid deaths, because it goes against the narrative that the more vaccinated the population, the more people should be "dying suddenly"

they praise charlatans like the youtube dr. campbell who routinely cherry picks in exactly this way, who routinely deletes any comments pointing out his bias, and never actually says the vax is bad, because even he knows it's not true, but is content to let his comments section flood with antivaxers spouting their nonsense because they're a rabid fan base that helps his channel grow.

billions of doses would have easily shown any patterns, but you're right in your OP, the only things have been publicized regarding myocarditis and such (which is still rarer than getting myocarditis from covid itself, or any other viral illness)

they keep harping on about how it's causing heart attacks and strokes, meanwhile in canada which at least 80% of people were vaccinated, almost every type of heart related condition has gone down the past few years, steadily.

there's nothing to it, but don't let that stop the dumb 4chan fags from arguing with me about it and maybe even pointing me to a link to another article that totally lies about the contents of a study.

>>516046595
Fuck off (((anon))) with this copy paste bullshit.

>>516043417
>and never speak to my "loved ones" again.
you're a fucking moron.

>>516042907 (OP)
>>516043163
I dug into the data, and it turns out you’re a lying faggot.

>>516047328
Guaranteed it's only the tip of the iceberg.

>>516043522
i know 5 people who got strokes or heart attacks at a young age (40s or younger) before covid, and one that "died suddenly" in his home while working out. an absolutely healthy and fit specimen of a man. your anecdotal evidence doesn't hold a candle to billions of doses around the world showing that there's nothing more to it than what OP said.

>>516047772
Don't ask what happens when your heart or gonadal cell walls are lined with virus protein because the mRNA moves all around your body.
> But at least it's not the virus killing you.
The virus was made by the same people with secular surnames

>>516047437
Imagine knowing so little about biology to think that you needed a vaccine for a disease AFTER you survived an infection from said disease.
Boost up:

Liberal Panic: covid is real and deadly!!! (basically what OP is saying), we need masks and vaccines (as long as it's not connected to trump!!)

Rightwing Counter-Liberal Panic: the covid vaxx is deadly!!! (even if it is connected to trump!!)

Current date: 2025

Give it time.

The coping continues, I see.

>>516045999
yeah that's the same article that headlined that the dirty samples "causes cancer!" but when you read the study, it specifically said there was no danger of cancer because there were no oncogenes present in any of the samples.
this is the bs I'm talking about from the antivax sites. they will either skew the meaning and take a stretch to try to say "vax bad" or even outright lie about a study, link it and just assume nobody will read the study but think their article is legit because they linked to the study and everything!
morons. all of you.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Total DNA ranged 371–1,548ng/dose and 1,130–6,280ng/dose in Pfizer and Moderna products, respectively. Specific DNA of multiple plasmid DNA targets ranged 0.22–7.28ng/dose for Pfizer, and 0.01–0.78ng/dose for Moderna. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori (0.25–23.72ng/dose) was only detected in Pfizer vials." - ["Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada" (2025)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The rate of hospitalization for cancer of any site was 0.85% in the unvaccinated group, and 1.15% in the group vaccinated with at least one dose (p<0.001). At multivariate analyses, the likelihood of cancer hospitalization was higher in the subjects who received at least one dose, compared to the unvaccinated (HR: 1.23; 1.11-1.37)" - ["COVID-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for cancer: 30-month cohort study in an Italian province" (2025)](https://www.excli.de/vol24/2025-8400/2025-8400.htm)

>>516044068
Hey, at least we got to skip the voluntary experimental zero long term data clinical trials.
You think they'll have the vaccine ready for whatever cancer they have you?
You think you'll be able to afford it?
Kek

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Based on a large cohort of health workers, our study confirms that adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccination can lead to a substantial amount of missed work shifts, potentially causing organizational-level disturbances in staffing." - ["Adverse drug reactions following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 3805 healthcare workers cause substantial sick-leave and are correlated to vaccine regimen, age, sex and serological response" (2025)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25008503)

>>516042907 (OP)
Hardly any doses were given out, they couldn't make them fast enough. It was mostly just saline. They even got busted for selling saline at full vaxx price

>>516050843
>yeah that's the same article that headlined that the dirty samples "causes cancer!" but when you read the study, it specifically said there was no danger of cancer because there were no oncogenes present in any of the samples.

Oncogenes are the only thing that can ever cause cancer?

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"In this study, 1745 healthcare workers in Switzerland were followed over several months to see how their vaccination status affected their chances of getting flu-like illnesses and missing work. The study found that those who recently received a COVID-19 booster were more likely to report symptoms and take sick leave." - ["Association of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status with risk of influenza-like illness and loss of workdays in healthcare workers" (2025)](https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-025-01046-8)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Vaccinated persons reported significantly more events that required the visit of a doctor (42% versus 30%, p = 0.0024), more Covid-19 infections (30% vs. 23%, p = 0.0535) and more musculoskeletal problems (21% vs. 15%, p = 0.059). Vaccinated respondents reported significantly more diseases overall (mean 1.6±1.6 vs. 1.3±1.4; p = 0.0023). [...] Finally, a propensity score analysis accounting for sociodemographic variables and pre-vaccination health status confirmed that Covid-19 occurred more frequently in vaccinated individuals (31% vs. 23%, p=0.103)." - ["Covid-19 vaccinations, self-reported health, and worldviews – A representative survey from Germany" (2024)](https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6205)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"This study is the first to evaluate the effects of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on ovarian follicles and ovarian reserve in a rat model. The findings demonstrate that both vaccines, particularly the mRNA vaccine, are associated with a reduction in ovarian reserve, characterized by depletion of the primordial follicle pool and increased follicular loss via apoptosis throughout folliculogenesis." - ["Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve" (2025)](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12031016/)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"COVID-19 diagnosis was not significantly associated with increased autoimmune disease risk (HR 1.092, p=0.491); however, receiving at least one COVID vaccine was linked to higher risk (HR 1.2323, p=0.0033)" - ["Investigating the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccination, and autoimmune diseases in a pediatric population: a comprehensive analysis" (2025)](https://ped-rheum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12969-025-01093-4)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"We conclude that at least from June 2021, SC [successful conception] rates in the Czech Republic for women vaccinated against COVID-19 before SC were substantially lower than for those who were unvaccinated before SC." - ["Rates of Successful Conceptions According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Data from the Czech Republic" (2025)](https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.2487)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Elevated IgG4 levels and higher ratios of non-cytophilic to cytophilic antibodies after booster vaccination were significantly associated with an increased risk of breakthrough infections [...]. Moreover, an increased non-cytophilic to cytophilic antibody ratio correlated with reduced functionality, including neutralization." - ["Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections" (2025)](https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(25)00067-2/fulltext)

>>516042907 (OP)
Really? I never heard this point of view before. Seems totally legit!

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Compared with controls, PVS [post-vaccination syndrome] participants exhibited differences in immune profiles, including reduced circulating memory and effector CD4 T cells (type 1 and type 2) and an increase in TNFα+ CD8 T cells. PVS participants also had lower anti-spike antibody titers, primarily due to fewer vaccine doses. Serological evidence of recent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation was observed more frequently in PVS participants. Further, individuals with PVS exhibited elevated levels of circulating spike protein compared to healthy controls." - ["Immunological and Antigenic Signatures Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination" (2025)](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v2)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"mRNA vaccines induce a highly dynamic and persistent training of innate immune cells enabling a sustained pro-inflammatory immune response" - ["Persistent epigenetic memory of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in monocyte-derived macrophages" (2025)](https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/s44320-025-00093-6)

>>516050903
The foil in all these comparisons is that the sickest, most frail and most unhealthy people were more likely to be "vaccinated" on advice of their doctors. so that group should always have worse long-term health outcomes anyway.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data and it actually looks like the covid vaccines were a lot safer than the consensus ever made them seem.
so show the data you've been "digging into"

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths were estimated to have increased by 1,236% from 2020 to 2023, rising from 11 excess deaths (95% CI: -12, 34) in 2020 to 147 excess deaths (95% CI: 123, 170) in 2023. A quadratic increase in excess cardiopulmonary arrest mortality was observed with higher COVID-19 vaccination rates. The general population of King County sharply declined by 0.94% (21,300) in 2021, deviating from the expected population size." - ["Excess Cardiopulmonary Arrest and Mortality after COVID-19 Vaccination in King County, Washington" (2024)](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380900765_Excess_Cardiopulmonary_Arrest_and_Mortality_after_COVID-19_Vaccination_in_King_County_Washington)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The combination of vaccination and natural SARS-CoV2 infection was associated with the development of severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock in patients with STEMI, possibly related to an increased serological response." - ["Association of SARS-CoV-2 immunoserology and vaccination status with myocardial infarction severity and outcome" (2024)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009873)

>>516042907 (OP)
>create problem
>sell solution
If it's anything like the polio vaccine from the 50's, we could see another "cancer crisis" in 20 years.
NT40 I think it was causes turbo cancer. Pfizer used it in their vaccine.
Also why would they poison their most loyal goyim?

I never bought into any of the Covid fearmongering, either over the disease or the vax. The disease was just a new seasonal flu bug. Dangerous only the elderly and the infirm, as all flu bugs are, but even then you have something like a 98% chance of surviving even as an at-risk person.

As for the vax, I was suspicious of it because of how hard they were pushing an experimental RNA vaccine for such a non-threatening virus. Why? I didn't trust it. I didn't buy into any of the conspiracy theories about it being poison or a way to insert tracking devices or whatever, that's just usual loony vaccine denying nonsense. It's just weird that every year a new flu vaccine rolls out and they're very non-threatening about offering this to the public. There's some fliers that go up and remind you to get your flu shots and the like, but there's no mandates, nobody loses their job for refusing to get a flu shot. It's very take it or leave it. I only bothered with flu shots when I worked in a place with lots of old people, I felt bad spreading flu to them unnecessarily.

But the covid vax was treated like some life-saving elixir that everybody had to take, OR ELSE. Yeah nah. Fuck that. If it's so safe and effective why did people who received multiple vaccines still get covid? I never got covid until after Biden declared the pandemic to be "officially over", ironically.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Findings showed an increased incidence of MCI [mild cognitive impairment] and AD [Alzheimer’s disease] in vaccinated individuals, particularly those receiving mRNA vaccines, within three months post-vaccination. The mRNA vaccine group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of AD (odds ratio [OR]: 1.225; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.025–1.464; P=0.026) and MCI (OR: 2.377; CI: 1.845–3.064; P<0.001) compared to the unvaccinated group." - ["A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease" (2024)](https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103/7684274)

>>516049846
They were ready to sit back and let the 'authorities' take kids from parents that didn't want to make them wear masks for 10 hours a day to get an 'education', or take shots that have for who knows what to their reproductive organs for a disease that could do them no harm.
You can't even trust the air they breath now, or their blood, why would you pretend to trust their love?
That would be just delusional.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The all-cause-death hazard ratios in univariate analysis for vaccinated people with 1, 2, and 3/4 doses versus unvaccinated people were 0.88, 1.23, and 1.21, respectively." - ["A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province" (2024)](https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/7/1343)

>>516042907 (OP)
I have seen so many deaths from family and friends. Fuck you jew.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Scherb et al. estimated the crude excess mortality for all causes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan in 2020, 2021, and 2022 to be -2.84% (95%CI: -4.46, -1.25), 0.80% (-0.83, 2.40), and 8.37% (6.74, 9.97), respectively, using linear logistic trend predictions based on 2005 to 2019 [5]. In our study, we estimated age-adjusted excess mortality by logistic regression with predictions from 2010 to 2019 and calculated -2.3% (-2.7, -1.9), 2.1% (1.6, 2.6), and 9.6% (9.0, 10.2), respectively. These results seem consistent. For all cancers, we estimated the excess mortalities to be -0.4% (-0.9, 0.1), 1.1% (0.5, 1.8), and 2.1% (1.4, 2.8), respectively, indicating no excess in 2020 and statistically significant increases in 2021 and especially in 2022." - ["Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan" (2024)](https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"In conclusion, our study presents evidence that the COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine impacts the WNT pathway and BDNF levels in rats, with particularly pronounced effects observed in males. These male-specific outcomes, including autism-like behaviors, reduced neuronal counts, and impaired motor performance, emphasize the potential neurodevelopmental implications of the vaccine, aligning with existing literature on the roles of the WNT pathway and BDNF signaling in neurodevelopmental disorders." - ["Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-Like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats: Insights into WNT and BDNF Signaling Perturbations" (2024)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11064-023-04089-2)

>#SafeAndEffective
>governments still assiduously hiding basic vax vs. pureblood data comparisons
>anecdotally, every other vax cattle has tales of persistent side effects, general health decline, and/or a #Sudden deaths of otherwise health people in their orbit
Any and all "vax is safe/safer" shilling is either pure cope by those increasingly unable to ignore the tsunami of in-their-face evidence, or $hills. You don't need either data or to be a detective to see what they did; only an intact frontal cortex.

>not a single pureblood regrets not submitting to the pogroms

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"emerging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals." - ["IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein" (2023)](https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/5/991)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"In a retrospective study of 700 SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated and 303 nonvaccinated patients who underwent PET/CT for indications other than myocarditis, patients who received their 2nd vaccine 1-180 days before imaging showed higher myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1 \[IQRs: 2.9-8.6]) than nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 3.3 \[IQR: 2.5-6.2]; _P_ range, <.001-<.001).

Myocardial 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax) was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex or patient age compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups." - ["Assessment of Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake at PET/CT in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients" (2023)](https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"By use of data from two large population-based cohorts, we have observed an increased risk of unexpected vaginal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination in nonmenstruating women across different stages of reproductive aging. Among post-, peri-, and premenopausal women, 3.3, 14.1, and 13.1% reported having one or several unexpected vaginal bleeding episodes during the last 8 to 9 months, of which approximately 50% were reported to have happened within 28 days of vaccination. In postmenopausal women, the risk of vaginal bleeding was increased two to threefold in the 4 weeks after vaccination, as compared to the prevaccination period. The association with vaccination was slightly stronger in peri- and premenopausal women where the risk was increased three to fivefold. In premenopausal women, the first 4 weeks after a dose of Spikevax was associated with a 32% increased risk as compared to Comirnaty." - ["Unexpected vaginal bleeding and COVID-19 vaccination in nonmenstruating women" (2023)](https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adg1391)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"We report four cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus after mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech). [...] All patients had autoantibodies against glutamate decarboxylase." - ["Type 1 diabetes mellitus following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination" (2022)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12020-022-03130-8)

give it 2 moar weeks, faggot.
or 12 years according to your fauci "i am the science" guy.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group" - ["Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults" (2022)](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428332/)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Our meta-analysis highlights a link between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and new onset or worsening of inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases. Moreover, the extent of disease exacerbation has been exemplified by cases from our dermatological department." - ["Autoimmune skin disorders and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination – a meta-analysis" (2023)](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddg.15114)

i have also been digging into the data...

>>516050045
I knew a few people that died before covid. Suicide, drug overdose, cancer, heart attack.
I know 10 times that who have died suddenly or died from turbo cancer in the last 3 years. Most cancers getting diagnosed as stage 4 and them dying inside 3 months (one in 3 weeks, found out early December, died boxing day).
I don't know if it's the shots.
What I do know is the fact that no one in the medical industry wants to talk about it, and absolutely no one in the exploratory science departments of the world are able to get funding to look into it.
Boost up.
The lucky few of us will continue to trust our innate immune systems and survival instinct to not trust the government when it forces its 'help' down our throats.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Here, we report that several months after the second vaccination, SARS-CoV-2–specific antibodies were increasingly composed of noninflammatory IgG4, which were further boosted by a third mRNA vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 variant breakthrough infections. IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose, on average, from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% late after the third vaccination. [...] This class switch was associated with a reduced capacity of the spike-specific antibodies to mediate antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis and complement deposition." - ["Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination" (2022)](https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798)

>novel gene therapeutic
>actually it's 30 years old but it never passed the animal trials
>call it a vaccine because pharma heads know no one wants gene therapy
>muh Wuhan 2012 isolate protein sent to pharma companies as a pdf for CAD printing
>we only have a year to create the perfect genetic code for this thing? Fuck it, let's do it in 2 days in the garage lol!
>whoops we can't patent that, better add a few proteins and knock off a few more, who cares it's close enough to the original lol
>can't grow a spike protein on it's own, let's make it grow in e coli
>let's add SV40 to the e coli batch so it gets super cancer and the protein printers go brrr
>we totally removed all the e coli plasmids and SV40 and antibiotic wash, didn't we?
>hey this new metal graphene which can go 2D, respond to electricity and has never been adequately tested on humans is great, let's add it as an adjuvant!
>phase 5 testing? We don't have time to do phase 4 testing. If it's experimental then it doesn't matter that it's in phase 3 testing.
>of course we can't be expected to test to see if it slows the spread, we're moving at the speed of science!
Every single one of you shilling in this thread needs to go get your booster and open your mouth wider. You're not just taking the dick, you need to swallow the balls too.
And now this thread will be pruned in 3... 2... 1...

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"mRNA-1273 booster vaccination-associated elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons(2.8%)" - ["Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination" (2023)](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.2978)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Among 44 276 704 individuals with at least 1 dose of COVID-19 vaccination, the incidence and clinical courses of VRM cases confirmed by the Expert Adjudication Committee of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency were analyzed. COVID-19 VRM was confirmed in 480 cases (1.08 cases per 100 000 persons). Vaccination-related myocarditis incidence was significantly higher in men than in women (1.35 vs. 0.82 per 100 000 persons, _P_ < 0.001) and in mRNA vaccines than in other vaccines (1.46 vs. 0.14 per 100 000 persons, _P_ < 0.001). Vaccination-related myocarditis incidence was highest in males between the ages of 12 and 17 years (5.29 cases per 100 000 persons) and lowest in females over 70 years (0.16 cases per 100 000 persons). Severe VRM was identified in 95 cases (19.8% of total VRM, 0.22 per 100 000 vaccinated persons), 85 intensive care unit admission (17.7%), 36 fulminant myocarditis (7.5%), 21 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (4.4%), 21 deaths (4.4%), and 1 heart transplantation (0.2%). Eight out of 21 deaths were sudden cardiac death (SCD) attributable to VRM proved by an autopsy, and all cases of SCD attributable to VRM were aged under 45 years and received mRNA vaccines." - ["COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis: a Korean nationwide study" (2023)](https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad339/7188747)

>>516042907 (OP)
It was a psyop

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The cumulative incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was significantly higher in the vaccinated cohort compared to the unvaccinated cohort, 2 years and 12 weeks after vaccination. The risk of retinal vascular occlusion significantly increased during the first 2 weeks after vaccination and persisted for 12 weeks. Additionally, individuals with first and second dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 had significantly increased risk of retinal vascular occlusion 2 years following vaccination, while no disparity was detected between brand and dose of vaccines. This large multicenter study strengthens the findings of previous cases. Retinal vascular occlusion may not be a coincidental finding after COVID-19 vaccination." - ["Risk assessment of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination" (2023)](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The scientific community needs to be aware and discuss whether the use of the current genetic COVID-19 vaccines, which was justified at the time of earlier deadly coronavirus variants, should still be encouraged at the time of Omicron variants. Another recent paper linked the formation of blood clots to vaccination with genetic vaccines in people aged 65 and over. Thus, at this stage, the risk/benefit could be re-assessed also for elderly people. The development of more traditional vaccines based on antigens that are much less variable and that are not endowed with intrinsic toxic effects is highly desirable for protecting the elderly and at-risk people, including those with autoimmunity." - ["Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases, in Patients with Cardiac Issues, and in the Healthy Population" (2023)](https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/2/233)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Recent discovery of SARS-CoV-2 genome integration through a mechanism involving LINE-1 or polymerase theta raises great concern regarding possible unwanted durable incorporation of spike protein sequences into the human genome. Moreover, the series of case reports describing diagnosed neurologic disorders, having as a sole common causality factor the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, undoubtedly highlights the potential association of retrotransposon activation to the emergence of these diseases. Human DNA interference by synthetic mRNAs in vaccines is more than simply a theoretical possibility. Reverse transcription of code from COVID-19 vaccine mRNA has been demonstrated in human hepatoma cell lines, although confirmation of the result by an independent group is needed." - ["Potential Mechanisms for Human Genome Integration of Genetic Code from SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination: Implications for Disease" (2022)](https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/potential-mechanisms-for-human-genome-integration-of-genetic-code-from-sarscov2-mrna-vaccination-implications-for-diseas.pdf)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"To date, clinical manifestations of post-vaccination side effects or injuries have been described but very few mechanisms have been offered to explain these findings. In the present study, we investigated whether an S1 protein mechanism of in inflammation similar to what we published in PASC might underlie the persistent, PASC-like symptoms that remain for months following vaccination with currently available vaccines in the US."

"Taken together, these findings suggest a possible mechanism for the debilitating symptoms found in some patients weeks and months following vaccination. The findings that the immune profile and persistent S1 protein in CD16 + monocytes suggest that S1 protein persistence is a major contributor not only of symptoms in post-vaccination individuals with PASC-like symptoms but also may be a major contributor of PASC itself given that S1 alone delivered by vaccination can cause similar pathologic features." - ["SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/ PASC-Like Symptoms" (2022)](https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1844677/v1/206f2ad5-a550-4359-a37e-18170828137a.pdf?c=1659457043)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"We found that pre-exposure to mRNA-LNPs or LNP alone led to long-term inhibition of the adaptive immune response, which could be overcome using standard adjuvants. On the other hand, we report that after pre-exposure to mRNA-LNPs, the resistance of mice to heterologous infections with influenza virus increased while resistance to _Candida albicans_ decreased. The diminished resistance to _Candida albicans_ correlated with a general decrease in blood neutrophil percentages. Interestingly, mice pre-exposed to the mRNA-LNP platform can pass down the acquired immune traits to their offspring [...]" - ["Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNP inhibits adaptive immune responses and alters innate immune fitness in an inheritable fashion" (2022)](https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1010830)

>>516051375
We weren't the ones saying it was 100% safe and effective.
Most of us just wanted to wait the regular time a healthy society should wait to develop a novel technology that's getting injected into everyone's arms.
Turns out we all went Russia/China as far as totalitarian control of 'coercing' everyone to take it.
And only 5% batted an eye at that.
Humanity as a whole deserves what's coming.
Too bad about those amongst us that just wanted to hold on to our integrity and common decency.
Boost up.
No one will EVER regret not taking it.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The figure shows that the strong increase in mortality in April 2021 and the further development of the excess deaths covaries with the strong increase of the number of vaccinations. Furthermore, the peaks of the excess mortality nearly coincides with the peaks of the vaccination campaign. Such a strong covariation suggests that the increase in excess mortality might be related to the increase in vaccinations. Since covariation does not neccessarily imply causation, further studies are needed to investigate this assumption. However, a further hint that vaccinations may indeed have increased mortality in the negative is the fact that the age group [0,29] has a peak in the excess mortality in June 2021 instead of April 2021, see the table and the graph in the supplement, Section 8.5. Data of the Robert Koch Institute show that for this age group the peak in the vaccination campaign is in fact only in June 2021." - ["Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022" (2022)](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362777743_Excess_mortality_in_Germany_2020-2022)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
«In light of the information discussed above about the cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins with human tissues and the possibility of either inducing autoimmunity, exacerbating already unhealthy conditions, or otherwise resulting in unforeseen consequences, it would only be prudent to do more extensive research regarding the autoimmune-inducing capacity of the SARS-CoV-2 antigens. The promotion and implementation of such an aggressive “immune passport” program worldwide in the absence of thorough and meticulous safety studies may exact a monumental cost on humanity in the form of another epidemic, this time a rising tide of increased autoimmune diseases and the years of suffering that come with them.» - ["Potential antigenic cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and human tissue with a possible link to an increase in autoimmune diseases" (2020)](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246018/)

>>516042907 (OP)
So take a "vaccine" with zero health benefits and numerous adverse side effects? Talk about retarded, just like the Covid scamdemic. The funniest part was when the media said the virus would make an exception for Black people to go bananas in the street for George Floyd during the Summer of 2020.

>>516043166
It would be nothing if there was an actual serious disease floating around and 99% survived healthy but 1% is too much if there was no reason for anyone to take a useless "vaxx" which didn't even qualify as a vaccine without broadening the definition. They basically watered it down so it doesn't have to prevent you from getting the flu or spreading it, they just memed some sort of a pray or spell that you will have to visit ER if you don't have the vaxx when you get the flu. But you will rather get a milder flu.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"A retrospective longitudinal multicenter comparison reveals temporary sperm concentration reduction 3 months post BNT162b2 vaccination and later recovery. Semen volume and motility remain stable." - ["Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors (2022)"](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209)

>>516042907 (OP)
>it actually looks like

a lot of batches were duds so they can claim reasonable deniability

- the vax was supposed to keep the fear going, killing just enough to make normies go for continuous boosters, claiming those deaths are from covid.
- more boosters, more deaths (just percentages, not 100%) to keep going the gift that keeps on giving: fear of covid death, now blaming the deaths on unvaxed.
- repeat ad nauseam
- also, it's a slow poison. not keeling over in the first two weeks after getting it doesn't mean you won't get a turbo cancer/heart condition/sterility/brain issues in the 5y after taking it.

WE WILL KNOW the deaths from vaxes are no longer expected, THUS NO DEPOPULATION, when EU/WEF/5eyes will drop their retard Net Zero plans.
>The net zero = windmills, EVs, deindustrialization was the plan for after the mass depopulation. 10% left of whites, can do with few windmills, and EVs in the 10min city.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"We found that the Pfizer/BioNT vaccine down regulate the concentration of cytochrome c in mitochondria upon incubation with normal and tumorous glial cells. Concentration of oxidized form of cytochrome c in brain cells has been shown to decrease upon incubation the mRNA vaccine. Lower concentration of oxidized cytochrome c results in lower effectiveness of oxidative phosphorylation (respiration), reduced apoptosis and lessened ATP production. Alteration of Amide I concentration, which may reflect the decrease of mRNA adenine nucleotide translocator. Moreover, mRNA vaccine leads to alterations in biochemical composition of lipids that suggest the increasing role of signaling. mRNA vaccine produce statistically significant changes in cell nucleus due to histone alterations. The results obtained for mitochondria, lipid droplets, cytoplasm may suggest that COVID-19 mRNA (Pfizer/BioNT) vaccine reprograms immune responses. The observed alterations in biochemical profiles upon incubation with COVID-19 mRNA in the specific organelles of the glial cells are similar to those we observe for brain cancer vs grade of aggressiveness." - ["Decoding COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Immunometabolism in Central Nervous System: human brain normal glial and glioma cells by Raman imaging" (2022)](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.02.482639v1.full)

>>516042907 (OP)
Never should have been mandated full stop and the general consensus of mass hypochondria should never be allowed to happen again.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination." - ["Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line" (2022)](https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm)

>>516051767

Study contains no RR, OR, any sort of CI for any of its claims. I can see why it was retracted.

>>516051990
We are now all of us residing in the land where pictures speak louder than words.

>>516042907 (OP)
I got my vaccine and booster at every possible opportunity.

My symptoms were:

* fatigue for one or two days

* sweating/fever for one day

* headache

That's pretty fucking mild compared to the symptoms of actually catching COVID.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination." - ["Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning"](https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712)

BLACK GENOCIDE OR WHITE EXTINCTION.
----------------------
---- - - The Death Of Iryna Zarutska - - ----

>>516044214
>your picrel
Regardless of the intent, western governments took advantage of how stupid the average person is and had the most effective beta test of a compliance framework they have ever seen.

I said it then and I'll say it now. I wasn't worry about covid. I'm much more worried about what comes next.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The authors concluded that there were no obvious safety signals precluding mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy. This was further justified with reference to a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion of 12.6% (104/827) that was considered similar to historic studies;"

"However, closer inspection of the 827 women in the denominator of this calculation reveals that between 700 to 713 women were exposed to the vaccine after the timeframe for recording the outcome had elapsed (up to 20 weeks of pregnancy). Hence, a re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results." - ["Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy" (2021)](https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf)

>>516052090
>I know 10 times that who have died suddenly or died from turbo cancer in the last 3 years. Most cancers getting diagnosed as stage 4 and them dying inside 3 months (one in 3 weeks, found out early December, died boxing day).

cool story bro, you should get it published. I know two people who have died of cancer recently. one had a long illness but ended up dying after an accident, not from the cancer. the other one was not vaccinated and was diagnosed and died within 2 months.
so my stories beat yours. you're wrong.

>>516052978
We're all too busy reading your posts to respond but I see you. Good job man.

>>516053049

So she willingly sat there close to the nigger. I always thought the nigger placed himself after the girl.

>you go into a train, where are +50% empty seats, and you chose to sit lose to the nigger, when were less dark people around you could sit by.
Yeah, I forgot she had the BLM poster at home.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"the bivalent-vaccinated group had a slightly but statistically significantly higher infection rate than the unvaccinated group in the statewide category and the age ≥50 years category" - ["COVID-19 Infection Rates in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Inmates: A Retrospective Cohort Study" (2023)](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482361/)

>>516053294
Fuck this board, I selected a cat.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19" - ["Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine" (2022)](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full)

This thread was sponsored by pfizer

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"we applied adjustments to the ONS data and showed that they lead to the conclusion that the vaccines do not reduce all-cause mortality, but rather produce genuine spikes in all-cause mortality shortly after vaccination" - ["Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination" (2021)](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination)

vaxitards keep boosting don't despair.
the ass cancer will eventually come for you too.

/thread
and
/sage

>>516043163
Go look at weather the suffers of "long covid" had been vaccinated, BECAUSE THEY ALMOST ALL FUCKING HAD BEEN.

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Spike protein expression was detected in 43.8% of vaccinated patients, predominantly localized to the intima of cerebral arteries, even up to 17months post-vaccination. While no active inflammatory changes were identified, infiltration of CD4-, CD8- and CD68- positive cells was observed in the spike protein positive vessels. In situ hybridization confirmed the presence of both vaccine-derived mRNA and SARS-CoV-2 virus-derived mRNA, which encode the spike protein, in select cases. Notably, spike protein positivity was observed exclusively in female patients (P = 0.015). None of the cases showed nucleocapsid protein positivity, supporting the absence of active viral infection." - ["Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination" (2025)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096758682500195X)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis, while non-modified mRNA vaccines induced opposite results, thus suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development." - ["Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?" (2024)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Here we demonstrate that incorporation of N1-methylpseudouridine into mRNA results in +1 ribosomal frameshifting in vitro and that cellular immunity in mice and humans to +1 frameshifted products from BNT162b2 vaccine mRNA translation occurs after vaccination. The +1 ribosome frameshifting observed is probably a consequence of N1-methylpseudouridine-induced ribosome stalling during IVT mRNA translation, with frameshifting occurring at ribosome slippery sequences." - ["N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting" (2023)](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3)

>>516043720
What a duplicitous cunt you are, you know the uk BANNED astrazeneca after first doses for being too dangerous so it was barely even used.

>>516042907 (OP)
>give a 13 year old myocarditis so 90 year old gramgram can live another month
based

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"Delivery of nucleic acids with positively charged lipid nanoparticles ((+)NPs) is widely used as research reagents and potentially for therapeutics due to their ability to deliver nucleic acids into the cell cytoplasm. However, in most reports little attention has been made to their toxic effects. In the present study, we performed comprehensive analyses of the potential toxicity associated with (+)NPs. Mice treated with (+)NPs showed increased liver enzyme release and body weight loss compared to mice treated with neutral or negatively charged NPs ((-)NPs), suggesting hepatotoxicity. Intravenous administration of (+)NPs induced interferon type I response and elevated mRNA levels of interferon responsive genes 15-25-fold higher than neutral and (-)NPs in different subsets of leukocytes. Moreover, treatment with (+)NPs provoked a dramatic pro-inflammatory response by inducing Th1 cytokines expression (IL-2, IFN gamma and TNF alpha) 10-75-fold higher than treatment with control particles. Finally, we showed that activation of TLR4 might serve as the underlying mechanism for induction of an immune response when (+)NPs are used. These results suggest that a careful attention must be made when different types of (+)NPs are being developed as nanotherapeutics." - ["The systemic toxicity of positively charged lipid nanoparticles and the role of Toll-like receptor 4 in immune activation" (2010)](http://dan-peer.tau.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ranit-kedmi-biomaterials-2010.pdf)

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
"In summary, here we show that the LNPs used for many preclinical studies are highly inflammatory. Thus, their potent adjuvant activity and reported superiority comparing to other adjuvants in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses could stem from their inflammatory nature. Furthermore, the preclinical LNPs are similar to the ones used for human vaccines, which could also explain the observed side effects in humans using this platform." - ["The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory" (2021)](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.04.430128v1.full)

>>516045329
>There the idea going around that all vaccine recipients are under heightened cancer risk, is this based on anything concrete?
No there is not they are trying to say ONLY THE BOOSED
There were MANY instances of people being fired for only giving out saline during the first round of shots though, also due to an error (which looks to be manufacturing related).

>>516042907 (OP)
>So I’ve been digging into the data
no sauce.
shut the fuck up kike.
it was a jewish bioweapon.
call me if you losers manage to reverse aging or cure cancer or disease.
fucking unreal.

>>516053294
>Good job man.
Thank you, anon. Always happy to help someone "digging into the data".

>>516053385

Literally every study shown by this user is pulling quotes and noncontextual numbers without showing any odds ratios, risk ratios, hell even any confidence intervals for anything claimed. These studies are not cohort studies, case-control studies, or randomized clinical trials directly for the covid-19 vaccines. The only way to use these to support the narrative that all types and boosters of the covid vaccines is to fundamentally not understand how epidemiology works and pulling anything that can support the arguement and ignoring everything else.

What a joke.

>>516050993
the antivaxers said the dirty samples cause cancer. The paper says the lack of oncogenes means it's not possible and not a concern.
sounds like the antivaxers headline was a blatant lie.

>>516054168
>These studies are not cohort studies, case-control studies, or randomized clinical trials directly for the covid-19 vaccines.
"A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day." - ["Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial" (2021)](https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635)

>>516051631
>You can't even trust the air they breath now, or their blood, why would you pretend to trust their love?
confirmed moron.

>>516054168
>These studies are not cohort studies, case-control studies, or randomized clinical trials directly for the covid-19 vaccines.
"During the blinded, controlled period, 15 BNT162b2 and 14 placebo recipients died; during the open-label period, 3 BNT162b2 and 2 original placebo recipients who received BNT162b2 after unblinding died. None of these deaths were considered related to BNT162b2 by investigators. Causes of death were balanced between BNT162b2 and placebo groups" - ["Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine" (2021)](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1.full.pdf)

>>516046178
Anyone who took that vax a (and got the actual mrna) had a chance from getting too little to getting too much (dependent on where in the batch your does came from) as such you potentially almost instantly accelerated most bad things going on in your body as if you had let them continue for decades, cancer, heart strain, prion diseases, all accelerated.
If you don't actually go round wondering why a lot people look so old now you are really blind.
Everyone I have met who had cancer prior to the mrna jab (and got over it) got it again in the years after the mrna jab.
Turbo cancer IS a thing since the mrna injections not before and during covid only since the injections.

>>516045670
Youre 100% canadian

>>516054350

That exact study ends with

"BNT162b2 continued to be safe and well tolerated." And "BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing
COVID-19"

Dude just read the studies your actually trying push. Instead you try to flood the chat, of which who is going to first read them bar your excerpts, and out of those actually understand what the numbers mean?

>>516043143
i remember reading about these masturbation machines somewhere else...

>>516054971
>you try to flood the chat
Ah, yes... the chat. I'm sure there's a setting in your 4chan profile for that. Ask your supervisor.

>>516055346

Ah yeah, sorry, I should be clear that is barely qualifies as an actual discussion on the topic to be considered a "chat".

>>516055813
>barely qualifies as an actual discussion
You qualified it by trying to correct the record.

>>516044068
>The same technology will cure cancer and honestly I hope that christcvcks don’t get it

>>516048268
They are completely ignorant and delusional. Ed Dowd already showed via the health insurance actuary data the negative effects and dangers of the mRNA covid vaxes. Let us not forget all of the idiots on reddit that posted their brain MRI scans where they are missed chunks of their brain. We are dealing with literal brain damaged fools.

>>516056047

Then it was a "chat" by your definition. Duh, semantics aside, the data critical to your arguement would be if a odds ratio for adverse health effects after a vaccine is over 1. It would be a decent first step to properly expressing an example of its increased risks. For America, less than a percentage of this country understands critical and basic public health knowledge, including ratios. Including those, and explaining them in your own words beyond just direct quotes will be much more effective.

Thread theme

>Booster Eleven - Pfizerizer
https://2cm.es/pfizerizer

>>516042907 (OP)
The only reason to care would be if you took it.
You didn't actually get vaccinated right?

>>516042907 (OP)
>Meanwhile, the actual virus had a way higher chance of hospitalising or killing you, especially before Omicron.
Compare flu deaths from pre-covid and COVID deaths the following years. Now see how many flu deaths there were during COVID. Magic?

>>516059005
Covid cured the common cold

>>516043143
>The governments around the world just wanted to inject people with cum because they wanted to see if they can get away with it
This, this, this. They think they can jizz across the world on the taxpayer's dime.

>>516059005

Not really, health departments generally go off of reporting based on symptoms, not always lab confirmation. In a situation like the pandemic, flu cases were not counted as testing as for covid, which came first as the risk for progression to pneumonia is more common, the risk of flu mortalities just isn't a reasonable fear for most americans. But covid releated pneumonia was the major cause of covid deaths. But the large factor here too is the social changes during the pandemic.

Staying indoors, limiting contact and wearing masks will stifle any respiratory infection rates, and we can see the attack rates for influenza during that window decreased.

Its not magic, its just preventative measures working in multiple directions.

>>516059107

Yes, because limiting the ability for someone to sneeze on you because you were stuck inside for a week will impact the ability to be infected by someone who needs to be close to you. Not to mention masks and distancing. Correlation, not causation.

>>516043163
Doubt

>>516042907 (OP)
You're going to die or get sick if you don't put this newstuff in your bloodstream, smarty-pants!

>>516042907 (OP)
cope

>>516060019
My mom and dad gave me a hug after Tucker Carlson said it's okay to do so.

>>516042907 (OP)
>Serious side effects = super rare (like 1 in tens of thousands to 1 in millions depending on type)
I know so many boomers that got shingles from it, also loads of them heart attacked - Based Covid Vaxx, we need another round of nigger cattle injections ASAP

>>516060019
>masks and distancing prevent the flu
>masks, distancing and vaccines don't prevent covid
Got it

>>516043163
>but we're talking handfuls of cases per million people
Trust The Science™!

>>516043163
I know 3 people who died, several that got weird shit like POTS, clots, other weird cardiovascular issues. Yeah fuck your Jewish lies, trying to down play the biological terror attack that Jewish faucci and Jewish pharma unleashed ion the world. You damage control niggers are a waste of breath. There will be trials fire crimes against humanity and I hope they treat them like faucci treated the poor beagles he tortured to death.

Reminder that you can throw your card away now goy

>>516061496
Better safe, than sorry!

>BOOSTIE BOYS - FAUX PROPHYLACTIC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nKJbMr0da8

>>516043713
King nigger funded and controlled the Wuhan lab where he sent this illegal experimentation/ gain of function research. Peter daszak, eco health alliance etc.

>>516042907 (OP)
That's cool. Still not taking it.

>>516042907 (OP)
The first few batches were different from the covid vaccine you see now.

>>516061300

Theres solid evidence that the methods are protective actions against incidence rates of covid-19. The issue for rising cases is multifactored, most notably that covid-19 is more infective, and can last in the environment for longer, and onset time can be longer in some patients, leading to transmissions while in faux prodromal stage.

>>516047976
My close family, all young or young-ish: 2 cancers, 1 heart attack, one arrhythmia needed surgery, one myocarditis, one arthritis needed hip replacement, one lupus flare up, one gut cancer, 4 died suddenlies. All vaxxed, all 2021 - 2023.
No family history of any of those

All replies greatly appreciated
so what kind of lifetime risk of complications does the average vaxxie have now?

>>516061677
the beastie boys are all fucking jews.

>>516061424
we've got a load of anons here all saying they know several people with severe complications
so why aren't they showing up in the data?

>>516063397
yes I played a bit of devils advocate to get you all talking, shoot me.

>>516057032
interesting, can you link me to his work?

>>516063171
While you're at it, ask ChatGPT why you're such an obedient, spineless little faggot who folds like a lawn chair in the face of true tyranny and abuse of authority?

>>516063430
The boostie boys are all fucking based

>>516042907 (OP)
Not so sure it was "anti-vax" panic as it was being targeted as a granny killer, losing your job, and generally being treated like a fucking leper for a "vaccine" that really underperformed, to say the least.

>>516063727
>The boostie boys are all fucking based
its like beastie de-jewed
yes, they are way more based than jewish beastie boys

>>516063834
HonkFM believes in being the change you want to see (and hear) in the world

>>516063980
>HonkFM believes in being the change you want to see (and hear) in the world
im laughing right now at that track.

Wow thats super interesting
My parents were in perfect health. Got multiple covid vaccines. Now my dad's dead from cancer and my mom is a vegetable. Complete freak health accidents i guess huh. They barely made it to about 60 years old despite being in perfect health before the vax. Thanks for reassuring me its completely unrelated

>>516063432
Your fake and gay data is controlled by Jewish pharma retards. That's like asking if fyntenol kills people why do drug dealers sell it? Because they get fucking money for it same as all these Jewish poisons. If you like injecting yourself with retard science juice to protect from a flu, maybe, then go for it but don't come crying when you don't get placebo and then die because the real injections cause cancer, VAIDS, cardiovascular clots, strokes, and random sudden deaths. If you want the REAL truth look at insurance excess death records. Also most of the vaxx injuries are not reported because they cover them up. Most of the deaths and injuries the drs are like huh idk why this 13 year had a heart attack, is totally normal and couldn't be the science juice we injected in them. No couldn't be that at all cause a jew on tv said it was safe and effective and they paid me millions to also say it's safe and effective.

>>516043143
I should have been me (assuming you got Abby to do it)

>>516063294
Lost an ear and part of their face, one of them, it showed up and got that bad in under a month.

>>516047976
I know literally hundreds of people who got gigavaxxed and they are all fine. Including women who went on to have 2 kids afterwards

>>516042907 (OP)

>It's okay people were forced to take experimental drugs because it's such a small percentage of people that the officials admit got hurt

Fuck you egghead, it's easy to have that opinion when you are looking at numbers on a screen and not having to see the death.

Fuck you egghead

I hope 1% of your family'and friends gets raped by niggers
They'll be fine its only 1%

>>516042907 (OP)
>all-cause mortality increased substantially after vaccine rollout NOT BEFORE.
>has yet to completely return to normal
Death was a side-effect of about +30%

>>516064527
As do I.
But they'd have been fine if they hadn't taken the shots.
That's the statistics as far as covid goes.

And some of them aren't fine, they're dead.
Or have cancer.
Or have myocarditus.
Or blood clots.
Or new allergies.
Or autoimmune disease.
Or shingles.
And maybe it's from something else.
Bur it's weird that they all came down with stuff AFTER the shots, and not in 2020.
And it's even weirder that not even one of them suspects the shots.
That's the biggest red flag.
Self preservation, and the curiosity that defines humanity, is gone.
Like they're missing a huge part of themselves now.
Disturbing, and sad.

>>516063638

Says the one who listens to what others tell them to believe instead of going out and trying to understand these concepts for yourself. What fucking timeline are we in that any sort of objective analysis is seen as weak instead of joining the echo chamber, blasting anyone with any dissenting opinion and then thats your claimed moral high ground?

Fuck dude, pull the stick out your ass and take a class on epidemiology, it'll atleast make your insults better.

>>516043713
Yes the Wuhan Institute of Virology coronavirus gain of function project was funded by NIH and Ecohealth Alliance.

Tap Tap
I've had all known versions of covid. Sorry to disappoint but I'm still alive without any vaxx and I went through that cold a few times over the years now. Still just fine

Why are so many vaxxed people insane today? Was there something triggering in the vax?

>>516042907 (OP)
vax should have been cancelled ages ago, after first handful of suddenlies, it's a dna changer, they had to change def of a vax to call it a vax, the stupid endless spike production gets passed on from mommy to baby so the mutant vaxtards are a new fucked type of human, you claim to be unvaxxed but seriously shove your hey fren it not that bad schtick up your clacker, guv.

>>516043163
>>516063432
>data
uk covid grandpa even says uk data is fucked and bases his youtube vids off other data from around the world. UK isn't even a proper cuntry these days