>>516064709 (OP)
You know, if you actually cared to know the answer to that (you don't because your baiting, trolling, a fed, or some such other thing) and you cared to, in our shared existence in this world, find some sort of common ground, and bridge the gap between you and those you get memed to oppose by people like Hassan Piker, there are plenty of voices out there that make it pretty clear. Nick Fuentes in his stream on Charlie Kirks death, among other great things that can be said about it, articulates an answer to this question pretty well, adressed it perfectly, and adressed Hassan Piker by name at one point. 1 hour of your life expended to absolve potentially years of pointless division, to find the clear and concise answer to your question, is a pretty small thing to ask, but I'm not asking you, I'm offering you a chance to answer your own question yourself, you now have that opportunity.
Leftists also never cared for or defended free speech when it was right wing people getting censored, so when they feign concern about it, it's a confession, that they have a dual ethic, they don't really care about the principle of free speech, they don't care about any principles in fact, so when I see that, I see a bluff, and it's a bluff to be called. They are liars too, many of them, after years have passed and people have largely forgotten about a thing, will tactically pretend it never happened.
That framing is also disingenuous.
"for not mourning", no, it's because they are celabrating his murder. That framing is so dishonest, I find it hard to beleive that he didn't compute that it was when he titled that video, or was actively trying to troll. If not that, he's so caught up in his little thing on the internet that he's lost sight of what truth is.