Thread 516088038

They tried to say it was a "technical glitch" when they had it on Amazon Books on Sept 9th. So are they just laughing and throwing it in our faces at this point????

>>516088038 (OP)
It says:
> Released: Sep 10

The Amazon screenshot of the "technical glitch"

>>516088121
So they had a book already written about something that happened the exact same day???

>>516088158
>Screenshot of a screenshot

>>516088038 (OP)
Even if it was released a week afterwards that would be highly sus. It takes TIME to not just write up the content but the editing, processing, converting into a sellable product, creating the product pages, etc.
This is very strange and I'd like to know a lot more about the author. I can hear rubbing sounds already.

>>516088038 (OP)
When you put a book up on Amazon, Amazon let's you put in any publish date you want.
>why
Because as far as Amazon knows, the book was first published on some other store before it was on Amazon. The published date is meant to represent the date the book was first published, not the date it was added to Amazon.
>why would somebody lie
Attention.

>>516088395
>this dude has been living under a rock and doesn't know that most "books" published today are AI slop that no human has ever read, let alone edited or written
I envy you.

>>516088038 (OP)
>book
at AI created mash of the news of the day.

>>516088038 (OP)
It was made by AI immediately after he was shot, you can backdate your publishing date on Amazon even if it’s a lie
Someone should do that for a 9/11 book

>>516088631
this, who the fuck writes a comprehensive in depth analysis on the same day?

>>516088776
mr lulz apparently

>>516088038 (OP)
Again this was originally on Amazon but they scrubbed the listing for it. This was all I could find, a smarter anon can find more.

>>516088038 (OP)
no archive link?

>>516089262
https://bookscouter.com/book/9798264842788-the-shooting-of-charlie-kirk-a-comprehensive-account-of-the-

>>516088038 (OP)
(You) are a mental fucking glitch

>>516088158
>>516089366
They already changed it.
There's no mention of anything that it was released September 9th now.
THIS IS WHY ARCHIVING IS IMPORTANT
NOW THEY CAN JUST DENY

>>516089496
Jij bent een kankerjood.

>>516089262
Archive link with the original publication date.
>https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K

>>516089553
Either way, it's fucking weird. A 81 page book released ONE DAY after it happened. 81 pages. Either it's AI slop that hasn't been physically printed, or else something is up.

>>516088196
>>516088776
>>516089804

Amazon allows tons of AI generated "books" like this you fucking retards

There was a "strategy guide" for Donkey Kong Bananza before it was even released

Could this just be a time zone thing

>>516089851
It was listed a day before the shooting
kys pedo

>>516088121
>>516088158
How could it be written and edited that fast never mind being uploaded so quick.

>>516089587
Ik heb je moeder gister nog op mn gezicht gehad. Wat een geile temeier is dat zeg, heer-lijk. Top recensie

>>516089851
It was published the day before the shooting. Check the internet archive link ITT.

>>516089721
o7
>>516089851
Doing the village tour, Avi?
>>516089989
Is dat alles?

>>516088038 (OP)
>>516088974
Has it occurred to you that the publication date is entered manually?

>>516088395
it was pre-published as a blank book and then republished with AI slop after the event as a sloppy instant book. I hope nobody bought it. Sadly, with all the publicity it has received it has probably sold some copies.

>>516088038 (OP)
>independently published
Welcome to the world of self-published slop. If you're lucky you will get a copypasted wikipedia article + things stolen from online publications to pad out the page count. If you're not, completely AI generated slop.

>>516089986
AI slop. There was no editing and it took 5 minutes to write

>>516088196
You went from
>released a day before
which was factually incorrect, now you pivotted to this shit. No, they probably didn't have a book written about it. Do you know what they had? Access to fucking grok or some other trash AI. It's 81 pages. You can write an 81 page book with just a handful of AI prompts.

If it was published immediately after the event, this is simple:
1) Build an AI Agent that scrapes the news for huge events
2) Instruct the agent to immediately start writing a book about the subject of the event
3) Configure it with an Amazon accounts
4) Submit your AI slop book

What the catch here is it being released before the event. Most likely scenario was already mentioned: someone published a book with different content and then changed it to the AI slop book right after the news broke to capitalise on it.

Who would benefit from releasing this otherwise?

Welcome to 2025. It will only get worse.