Thread 516100899

https://files.catbox.moe/vmqt4m.webm
>https://files.catbox.moe/vmqt4m.webm
https://files.catbox.moe/vmqt4m.webm
>https://files.catbox.moe/vmqt4m.webm

Nobody has a rational explanation for this

Watch how quickly this thread gets derailed by aimless speculation about hand gestures and camera guns

Anything to take your focus away from the literal smoking gun

>>516100899 (OP)
There's another reflexion which caught my eye, it's closer to the tent to a wall behind Kirk, to the right.

It aligns with the supposed projectile that flew in from the back, i'm pretty sure his chain got hit, that's the weird "cable" we've seen flying around

Others said it's the cable of his mic, while he uses a cableless microphone that is on his hands and i don't think he had an ear piece, he debated people without a script.

Bullet flies, gets caught on cam, hits chain, creates sparks which is reflected on a wall behind him, Charlie dies.

They will avoid this thread because I've explained how they would try and muddy the waters here, so they will just bump other threads to try and bury this one now

Explain the flash

2 posts without bumping?

auto-saging?

Yeah thread is auto-saging

I see you, glownigger

>>516100899 (OP)
how to request an autopsy?

I don't know what else to add to be honest, but i'm pretty sure the chain flicking up and the right side from charlies POV being hit, damaged is a clear indicator

The chain being thrown up by the impact first before any exit wound is visible on the neck is another indicator. They're trying their hardest to cover this up

But the evidence suggests the shot did not come from the front but from the back. If the chain were to be hit from the front, it wouldn't flick to the left (Charlie's POV) but to the right (Charlie's POV)

>>516102308
No chance you'll get the truth from any official source

Our best bet is to find more uploaded footage, more angles

>>516100899 (OP)
so thats the guy on the stairs. the real shooter and that explains why he's a different guy than Tyler.

>>516102448
I think the 'chain' might be an ear-piece synced up to the audience mic, to make sure charlie can hear them perfectly. The wire does get severed, that's worth pointing out because of course a bullet from the front can't explain the wire being cut at the moment of impact.

>>516100899 (OP)
You are pretty much confirmed, correct, anon
/pol/ found the guy in the reflection, last night

>>516102808
Here you can see his necklace

>>516103357
And here you can see the necklace being flung up, the reflection of the bullet hitting the chain, i'll attach in the next post

But here i want you to note the chain, it's darker when in front of a white background and becomes more "silverish" against a black background

You can see the two different colors against the same background

>>516103357
So punk rock

>>516103508
that's not the necklace that's part of the vest he was wearing that he put on after the photo op's

>>516100899 (OP)
>https://files.catbox.moe/vmqt4m.webm
Is it possible that this is a glass surface and this is the reflection of the muzzleflash from across the quad?

The window (if that is a window) looks like it is at the right angle to be reflecting the direction of the roof the shooter was on.

>>516102448
Uh the opposite my bad, it got flicked to the right from Charlie's POV, as in the right part of the chain getting hit and being "torn" open by the impact

If the shot went through his neck, the chain wouldn't flick up first before a supposed "entry" wound is visible, plus it wouldn't flick up to the right of charlie but to his left

I'm gonna skim frame by frame to highlight what i think is the reflection of his metallic chain being hit by a brass bullet and creating "sparks" so to speak

>>516103508
I mean this pic alone proves a lot, the chain is being hit FIRST before his shirt flicks up, the chain is already destroyed but I'm still gonna do the frame-by-frame thing to show the brass on metal hit and creating sparks that are being actually reflected on a background near the old grandpa with the white hat and beard

>>516100899 (OP)
Have you calculated if a muzzle flash could possibly be visible from that distance according to the square inverse law and shown your work?

>>516100899 (OP)
Slowest bullet ever.

people would know if the shot came from there, anon.

the distance of the shot is around 100-200 yards away going by the crack and report, so work with that.

>>516102549
>No chance you'll get the truth from any official source
at least they will be caught in their own lies, an official autopsy is needed

>>516100899 (OP)
>thread gets derailed by aimless speculation
Your entire thread is aimless speculation, retard.