>>516555266 (OP)
Honestly, I don't get why people lose their minds over this. Itβs just a little bit of skin, right? Like, weβre not talking about chopping off fingers or anything. The way some of you go on about it, youβd think every circumcized guy walks around traumatized, clutching his phantom foreskin or something. Spoiler alert: most donβt even think about it. Itβs like clipping your nails - yeah, youβre technically removing part of your body, but whoβs crying over it? Life moves on.
Hereβs the thing: the practice has been around for thousands of years. Youβre not exactly uncovering a secret conspiracy here. People have done it for religious reasons, hygiene reasons, cultural reasons, whatever. Sure, maybe itβs not 100% medically necessary in most cases these days, but guess what? Neither is eating kale, and I donβt see anyone frothing at the mouth about that. The idea that itβs some grand violation is just peak internet hyperbole. Not everything is a moral battleground, and not every parenting decision needs to be dissected like itβs a Supreme Court case.
Donβt get me started on the 'my body, my choice' crowd suddenly going full activist for infant foreskins. Give me a break. You guys sound EXACTLY like feminist retards and it's so tiresome. Babies donβt get a choice in anything. Not their vaccines, not their bedtime, not even the ugly onesies their mom buys. Are we going to start holding public debates about those too? 'Baw, my parents didnβt let me choose my haircut when I was five, Iβm so oppressed!' Fuck off.
At the end of the day, whatβs the big deal? Are you going to sit there on your high horse crying over foreskins while the world burns around you? This is a non-issue dressed up as a crisis, and the only reason itβs even a debate is because people on the internet need something to scream about. If you donβt want to circumcise your kid, donβt. If you do, then do. But the idea that itβs worth all this drama? Nah, man. Touch grass, get a hobby, and chill.