>>516566052
There's two major schools of modern feminism
>women should all be shameless pro-sex whores leveraging their pussy to leech maximum resources from men for minimum effort. Absolutely anything that impinges on the freedom of women to do anything they want must be opposed in every way possible.
I call this group 'the Tapeworms'
>we hate men so much that absolutely anything that gives men enjoyment, fulfilment, wealth, or satisfaction should be discouraged, defunded, and illegalised as much as possible. Anything that men enjoy is bad for women. Sex bad, porn bad, whores bad because they make men happy. Women unilaterally deserve exclusive things just for themselves but men should never have anything to themselves. Women can do anything men can do. Women do not need men (a lie but they're committed to maintaining the illusion no matter what).
I call this group 'the Warthogs'
Both schools have significant crossover in beliefs. ie high level careers and education favouring women, abortion rights, heinous divorce laws, etc.
But in recent years as they both approach end game they've started to diverge.
Trannies, for example.
The Tapeworms are okay with trannies because it's the furtherance of degeneracy and sexual perversions that they directly profit from.
The Warthogs hate troons because they hate men, and see troons as men that are daring to steal their woman-only privileges.
But the biggest one which is a war they've been waging since the 1970s is 'sex work'.
It's a shameless exploitation of male urges for the advantage of cuntoids, which Tapeworms love.
But it also induces positive emotions in men, and damages the "women are more than sex objects" narrative Warthogs have been trying to push for decades.
For a long time the Warthogs were winning. It was Warthogs that got women into politics, police, college, important careers.
But internet and social media superpowered the Tapeworm ideology by expanding each woman's leeching potential to infinity.