Thread 516572404

Wait why is Ted Cruz saying this, I thought the government didn't have anything to do with cancelling Kimmel

>>516572404 (OP)

They cancelled Kimmel because his ratings were shit and didn't want to risk getting sued, right? Or am I missing something?

>>516572404 (OP)
heh yeah imagine if conservatives faced government censorship
that'd be craaaaaaaaazy

>>516572404 (OP)
Kimmel lied.

>>516572553
supposedly they cancelled kimmel because the program director asked kimmel to apoloize, and instead kimmel said he was going to double down and that it was ironic comedy. abc does have obligations attached to their broadcast license. fcc chairman's warning is appropriate, but since abc acted in advance of the kimmel program going off the rails entirely, the broadcast industry has somewhat demonstrated its ability to self-regulate inappropriate public broadcasting. inappropriate in this case because it is overt lies, and inciting offensive rhetoric. he has a private right to express these opinions, but he does not have a private right to broadcast these opinions on public and licensed airwaves.

>>516572806
They will in a year after midterms for the first time in their lives. I never wanted that, but you guys showed your true, disgusting colors over the past week. You will be so silenced you will never get a word on public airwaves after november of 26

>>516573063
you'll never be a real woman and gender dysphoria isn't a real thing

>>516572991

As expected. Thanks for the rundown. Kimmel has always been a hack and I am glad he's been deplatformed.

>>516572991
Man, we've come a long way form just calling eachother faggots.

>>516573209
The American right will not let you win again, even if they don't completely exterminate you. They aren't stupid enough to allow you anywhere near power after this.

>>516572404 (OP)

notice how the only thing that escalates is their desire for more digital surveillance - they are preparing you for war time suppression levels

>>516572991
>Ironic comedy
You can't hate retards like Kimmel enough

>>516574012
the standard is somewhat 'could you say that in a bar without causing a fight' and i think what kimmel said could be reasonably expected to start a bar fight in various places across the united states. if it can start a bar fight, then them's fighting words.