>>516600793
Well, not quite. Taking the line he did is politically wise. But no, the official story of the assassination is patently false. The circumstantial evidence found in the reaction to Kirk's death and the growing timeline of Zionist donor interfacing and influencing Kirk's actions had laid out in the open how strong the network is. AIPAC refuses to leave the conversation - too many people have taken notice that foreign lobbying is the mainstay of what guides our decision-making overseas. The real complicating factor here is the sway of Christianity and the ongoing culture war set in motion long ago.
Accepting the idea that we must live in a permanent state of diminishing how severe the infiltration is an old and extremely tired idea. You're entirely welcome to roll over and accept the tyranny - that's how we got here, first by corruption, then by intimidation, now, increasingly by mandate and dedicated semantic word games.
Anyone with their head remotely screwed on straight can read the air in the room. Desperation, expediency and a casual disregard for what are worthwhile and pressing questions. How the Kirk assassination played out is not settled, but they have deemed it as such, which alone indicates they're rushing to force a narrative.
Meanwhile overseas the Israelis are demolishing Gaza City, obliterated the Yemeni political cabinet, struck Qatar in a rather taboo manner and are facing down increasing clamor from the UN member states who have embraced the confirmed declaration of genocide occurring in the Palestinian territories. Netanyahu and Gallant are both on the ICC's wanted list and the international media are starting to murmur about interventions.
It's a shame you guys hypnotically focus upon the talking heads. Given an opportunity to sit down with Nick I could easily deconstruct the half-hearted commentary. There are vastly more experienced figures analyzing the situations here and aboard - Nick is at best elementary stuff.
