>>516618225 (OP)
>there has never been a single successful right-wing society?
The entirety of human history until industrialization was more right wing than anyone since has been. You think Hadrian was Left? Genghis? Atillah? Alexander?
>>516619343
>yes, the regime that went after socialists and communists first is left wang
You mean the revolutionary socialist regime that immediately signed a pact with the soviets? The regime to which the west owes its entire suite of labor rights?
The origin of the terms Left and Right should make this concept pretty clear. Both Left and Right Wing at their inception had the implicit assumption that foreigners have no right and should have restricted privilege within a host nation. Both believed strongly in the self-determination of their own people and the enslavement of others, though there were disagreements about the acceptable form and title of that slavery. Only after industrialization do we see anti-nationalist sentiment in what is now called The Left. This of course was due to Zionist infiltration.
For all but the last hundred years, If you espoused modern "right wing" ideas like tolerance for former prostitutes as worship leaders, you'd be burned at the stake without a trial.