← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 516640331

21 posts 20 images 17 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: LGonrdQq) United States No.516640331 >>516640389 >>516640860 >>516642050 >>516642337 >>516643536 >>516643845 >>516645442
Hey Jimmy Kimcel's
Anonymous (ID: qh3bC7iR) Greece No.516640389 >>516640651
>>516640331 (OP)
Too long, didn't read
Anonymous (ID: yX8MfoE4) United States No.516640518
Anonymous (ID: LGonrdQq) United States No.516640651
>>516640389
tl;dr
Anonymous (ID: lptIRMQd) Canada No.516640860 >>516642033 >>516642382
>>516640331 (OP)

You know you can contact the FCC and make a complaint about what Kimmel said
Anonymous (ID: lptIRMQd) Canada No.516641362 >>516641838
Anonymous (ID: 7OqgHHoC) United States No.516641733
1. When public speech is monopolized under a few online platforms which act as de facto public spaces, censorship of these platforms should be treated as a violation of the 1st amendment, regardless of whether they are privately owned
2. If the government is coercing or threatening a private company into censorship, that is a clear violation of the 1st amendment
Anonymous (ID: V75Hs+Sn) United States No.516641838 >>516642382
>>516641362
So if I had to watch Kimmel can I get a $100,000,000 settlement?
Anonymous (ID: 4Y6xdO7t) Canada No.516642033 >>516642595
>>516640860
Why not post the full thing?
>For purposes of this rule, β€œpublic harm” must begin immediately, and cause direct and actual damage to property or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their duties.
Anonymous (ID: dPXydcD0) United States No.516642050 >>516642080 >>516642370 >>516642908
>>516640331 (OP)
Cancel culture is heckin great when our side does it!
Anonymous (ID: BLAdAKT/) Australia No.516642080
>>516642050
Yes.
Anonymous (ID: g+YbBxJJ) United States No.516642337
>>516640331 (OP)
>man this Kimmel guy is costing us a shitload of money and has shit ratings but we can't cut him loose
>hold my beer
Anonymous (ID: U7Rfmqnt) Poland No.516642370 >>516643635
>>516642050
there's nothing wrong with cancelling enemy propaganda
Anonymous (ID: lptIRMQd) Canada No.516642382
>>516641838
No , it does not work that way ,

Alex Jones was sued and the plaintiffs won because he cause emotional distress for spread a Hoax / "fake news" -- ene though he was an "entertainer" like Kimmel.

Kimmel violate FCC rules
>>516640860

Not only would ABC have to pay the fine ( after the investigation ) -- it's finding would be a speed run for the Kirk family to get a huge payout
>>Oh and what standards do we have set -- $1.5 billion .....

And since they would have the FCC violation already in hand, ABC has no defence , all the court has to do if find the amount they feel would be appropriate.
Anonymous (ID: lptIRMQd) Canada No.516642595
>>516642033
>Why not post the full thing?

Too wordy -- ie TL;dr

oh and that part can be interpreted many ways, not by a court , but by a board from the FCC .
Lillitts9 (ID: cLuRc9zp) United States No.516642908
>>516642050
Didn't they fucking do it anyway?
Anonymous (ID: Kk3hU9do) United States No.516643536
>>516640331 (OP)
more like Jimmy chemtrails the disgusting fat fuck
Anonymous (ID: fM96BLQN) No.516643635
>>516642370
Protip:
If you keep switching sides, you will be always on the right side.
It is what Jews do.
Anonymous (ID: NQUl5Y15) United States No.516643845
>>516640331 (OP)
Anonymous (ID: gZVTF1Mk) Indonesia No.516645442
>>516640331 (OP)
If this is true, then only the rich and powerful have free speech. The rest are cattle.
Do Americans not realize this?
Anonymous (ID: lfeaFY5F) United Kingdom No.516646305