← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 516700411

13 posts 2 images 11 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: u4lLe7bV) No.516700411 >>516700560 >>516700611 >>516700691 >>516700819
TACO'd
You fell for it again!
Anonymous (ID: Otlpbpc7) United States No.516700543
Seems like its step 1 to get you jeets in line. Hopefully many more steps to come
Anonymous (ID: V3/pcng3) United States No.516700560 >>516700899 >>516701387
>>516700411 (OP)
Even if it is a one time payment. None of these common Indian workers are worth 100,000 dollars. You think these companies made money spending more then they had to?
Anonymous (ID: wI2If8pc) United States No.516700611
>>516700411 (OP)
shit in the toilet pajeet
Anonymous (ID: I3FxyQE8) United States No.516700691
>>516700411 (OP)
who the fuck cares. I'll burn my ballot before I cast it for a democrat
Anonymous (ID: K25Wd/Jz) United States No.516700819
>>516700411 (OP)
>applied to next cycle
It will affect would be tech ranjeets
I don’t get it, the libs say “b-b-but it will move tech to china!!!!”
Ok? I’d let china become the “hegemony” and take in ranjeets who grope, poop in beaches, and make ethnic enclaves than USA become India like Canada has
Anonymous (ID: 5ciFLZd2) United States No.516700899 >>516701220 >>516701346 >>516702001
>>516700560
Retard, if they pay a jeet 45k a year vs 90k for a equivalent American then they will make their money back in a little over 2 years.
Jeet slaves can't quit easily so after that they're still saving long term.
Anonymous (ID: V3/pcng3) United States No.516701220 >>516701379
>>516700899
>2 years
Most companies won't wait that long. They want profits now.
Anonymous (ID: jtYsdVk0) United States No.516701346 >>516702001
>>516700899
H1B minimum salary is like 65k bro
Anonymous (ID: GEuI803k) United States No.516701379
>>516701220
Yeah, and it's also going to take a big poo on the balance sheet
Anonymous (ID: X3DJBcam) No.516701387 >>516701601 >>516702001
>>516700560
Tech workers are some of the highest grossing workers. -$100k isn't so bad if the return is still 300k yearly.
Anonymous (ID: GEuI803k) United States No.516701601
>>516701387
They aren't paying these jeets $300k and this isn't to get talent. Companies do this to pay a jeet less than an American would accept to do a job that is hopefully good enough.
Anonymous (ID: fktj1TVe) United States No.516702001
>>516700899
>>516701346
So let's see that a company wants to hire 100 Indian workers, that is 10 million and knowing the US government, taxes will be added to that. Going by the numbers given, those Indians will make back anywhere from 4.5-6.5 million. That is still a huge deficit that most companies would find unacceptable

>>516701387
>Highest grossing
If they are being hired for cheap, which is the whole reason they are here, they are not good. If they were any good they would be worth more.