Thread 516705631

How to respond to this?

It's all good until the government is involved

>>516705631 (OP)
As amphibians that do not nurse their young, there is no reason for frogs to have nipples.

>>516705820
kimmel was not arrested, he was fired by a private company that did not want to host his vile speech

>>516705850
me getting to suck pepe's nipples is reason enough.

>>516705850
what about 6 packs

>>516705631 (OP)
You respond by agreeing because it’s right

>>516705940
The FCC threatened Disney. The government is getting involved.

>>516705631 (OP)
Nipples protruding, very disrespectful!

>>516706022
I'll allow it then. Carry on.
>>516706254
It's the FCC's duty to warn broadcasters when they are in danger of violations.

>>516706254
what did they threaten them with

>>516705631 (OP)
Mormons routinely break trespassing laws and police just let them get away with it fwiw

>>516706513
They threatened to revoke their licenses.
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disneys-kimmel-suspension-shows-trumps-increasing-grip-over-media-2025-09-20/
>The move, which came after Kimmel's remarks about the accused killer of slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk, has jolted the U.S. media and entertainment industries and intensified free-speech fears as the Trump-appointed FCC chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke broadcast licenses from stations that carry what he called "garbage."

>>516706481
>It's the FCC's duty to warn broadcasters when they are in danger of violations.
What violations?

>>516705631 (OP)
>wait no not like that

>>516707237
so no you're mad that the FCC warned them instead of just revoking their license immediately lmao
go take a nap kid

>>516705631 (OP)
This sound very passive aggressive

>>516705631 (OP)
i handle the world's lies every day, but they can't stand the truth for more than 30sec
i always tell them they are stupid, they're essentially engaging in self-harm, but they that notion itself requires so much prerequisite education on their part

>>516707237
>They threatened to revoke their licenses.
They can't just revoke licenses you retard. At absolute worst they ABC would get a petty fine. Broadcast companies overstep all the time, with varying degrees of consequence.
9/11 had swearing all over the place on live-coverage, people jumping from buildings, blood, and carnage.
On the other hand, I imagine they did get for Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" at the Super Bowl.

>>516705940
You’re right but beaners can’t differentiate finer points.

>>516707932
>They can't just revoke licenses you retard.
They can in Trump's America where he can violate the constitution blatantly and get away with it.

>>516708530
how is that a violation of the constitution?

>>516708603
It's a blatant violation of the 1A. I wouldn't classify Kimmel's speech as hate speech, but even if you find some measure to classify it as that, it would still be considered protected speech.

Was Bill Maher being cancelled in 2001 the same?

>>516708725
the FCC is a violation of the 1st amendment?
seems like any democrat president/congress could have pushed to abolish it at any time, but they chose not to
they don't get to whine now when they are finally forced to play by the rules they've been making republicans play by for years
no crying like little bitches, sorry

>>516708935
When did the FCC under a democrat president ever go after a talk show host for some mild comments they made?
>the FCC is a violation of the 1st amendment?
No. The government threatening businesses with their licenses over free speech is a violation of the 1A.

>>516705631 (OP)
I don't disagree.

>>516707747
>i always tell them they are stupid, they're essentially engaging in self-harm
Maybe there's a better approach.

>>516708603
What was violated?
I can't think of a single thing that was ever violated. Can you provide a few examples, including the specific part of the constitution that regarding that thing?

>>516709107
so the FCC can't warn people that they are in danger of violating regulations?
and companies can't fire people that are legal, financial, and reputation liabilities?
what exactly are you whining about?

>>516709402
>the FCC can't warn people that they are in danger of violating regulations?
What regulations?
>companies can't fire people that are legal, financial, and reputation liabilities?
No they can, but it shouldn't be coming from the government. They should be making that choice independently.

>>516705631 (OP)
>How to respond to this
That's pretty much just paraphrasing what anyone who isn't a low IQ nigger would understand about the constitution. It's doesn't GIVE anyone "rights" because that's not how rights work. Especially if you believe in natural rights of man which the framework of American legal systems were originally drafted with in mind. It simply LIMITS what the government can and can't do in regards to your personal rights.

>>516705631 (OP)
I respond by pointing out that there's a difference between the law of free speech and the idea, the value of free speech. The law is derived from the idea. Why do so many countries protect freedome of expression in their constitution? Because the value, the idea of free speech is important, and the law reflect this idea.
To cling to the legal definition of free speech while simulatenously acting in a way that disrespects the idea of free speech is to fundamentally misunderstand and betray both the idea of free speech and why it is enshrined into law in the first place.

>>516709495
>They should be making that choice independently.
They did.
>After the conversation between Kimmel and Walden, she and other senior executives thought that the star’s approach could make the situation worse, people familiar with their conversations said. Executives also discussed staff safety, including threatening emails staff on Kimmel’s show had received after Carr’s remarks and the posting of some of their personal information online, the people said.

>Walden huddled with her team and Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger before the two executives decided to temporarily take “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” off the air, the people said. She then informed Kimmel of the decision. -WSJ

>>516709495
>What regulations?
Idk, you're the one claiming that the FCC was threatening them so why don't you tell us?
>No they can, but it shouldn't be coming from the government. They should be making that choice independently.
the government did not fire or arrest jimmy, they did not fine ABC. You are claiming that they notified ABC about a potential violation

>>516709896
>government threatens company to revoke their license if they don't remove one of their employees
>company capitulates
How is that them making the choice independently? Are you arguing they would've done that regardless of whether or not the FCC got involved?

>>516709941
>>Idk, you're the one claiming that the FCC was threatening them so why don't you tell us?
>FCC controls broadcast licenses
>FCC threatens to pull license from Disney if they don't remove Kimmel
>Disney fires Kimmel
How is that so hard to understand?
>the government did not fire or arrest jimmy, they did not fine ABC.
>You are claiming that they notified ABC about a potential violation
I'm saying the exact opposite LOL. There were no "potential violations" because the 1A protects everything Kimmel said, they threatened ABC and ABC capitulated. That's not hard to understand.

>>516709495
>What regulations?
The laws regarding fake news are pretty clear.

>>516705631 (OP)
the government using cutouts, threats and "chokepoints" to bypass the 1st amendment goes against the spirit of it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point

>>516710412
No, I'm not arguing that. It's a fact that they shitcanned Kimmel because he wouldn't put the shovel down. It had nothing to do with what he had done and everything to do with what he was going to do.

>>516710412
do you have any proof that they threatened to revoke the license if ABC didn't remove kimmel?

>>516705631 (OP)
It was bullshit when the left started it by getting people fired for saying there's only 2 genders and shit, but it's based and hilarious right now with leftoids getting fired from their jobs. They deserve every bit of their punishment.

>>516710419
This is what Kimmel said:
>"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger-pointing, there was grieving."
What did he say here that was "fake news"?
>The licensee knows this information is false
It was broadcasted on September 16th. We still don't even have enough information now to reasonably assume the shooter's political alignment. Trump and Kash Patel were saying he was a leftist before they even caught the guy.
>It is foreseeable that broadcast of the information will cause substantial public harm
Kimmel denounced the violence. He wasn't promoting it.

>>516710698
>It had nothing to do with what he had done and everything to do with what he was going to do.
Going to do what? Deliver bad jokes to his aging audience?

>>516710846
Yeah, even the FCC Chairman has spoken about it.
>“This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney,” Carr said in an interview released Wednesday with right-wing political commentator Benny Johnson. “We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
>"There's actions we can take on licensed broadcasters. It's long past the time that...Comcast and Disney say 'We're not gonna run Kimmel anymore...because we licensed broadcasters are running the possibly of fines or licensed revocation from the FCC.'"
https://www.notus.org/media/fcc-brendan-carr-jimmy-kimmel-charlie-kirk-comments
https://x.com/BulwarkOnline/status/1968392506711613526

>>516711319
so the FCC notified ABC about the possibility of fines if Jimmy kept perpetuating hoaxes? would you rather them have fined them or revoked their license with warning and giving them a chance to correct their broadcasting?
you need to make up your mind and get your story straight

>>516707237
>They threatened to revoke their licenses.
Yes, but they didn't revoked it. Grownups call that a warning.

>>516709107
>When did the FCC under a democrat president ever go after a talk show host for some mild comments they made?
FDR did way worse things than that

>>516711319
>the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them
The licensee knows this information is false. I can be charitable and say that the licensee doesn't know this to be false and that they have a case in any such action, but they already folded and Kimmel got told to stfu by his bosses. That's on them and also on him. He should have checked the contract before he signed away his protected speech.

>>516707237
>What violations?
He violated FCC regulations. You could argue that FCC rules are anticonstitutional, but that is not what you're arguing.

>>516711319
>the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them
This was a lie, and a deflection from the fact it was obvious it was a leftist freak from the moment Kirk got shit. No one desperately tried to make the shooter out to be anyone but them, except coping and seething leftists. Don't be dense.

>>516711319
>We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them
This got Kimmel canceled. You cannot mislead the viewers using public airwaves.
>We still don't even have enough information now to reasonably assume the shooter's political alignment.
We do. The FBI released what they had on last Saturday or Sunday.

>>516705631 (OP)
didnt read

News distortion is an FCC violation
the channels that air Kimmel were running a risk of having a pattern of news distortion and chose to stop airing him because he is a liability
ABC fired Kimmel because nobody wanted to air his content. This is very standard, but undeestandably confusing for people that don't know anything about the industry.
For anyone genuinely interested listen to the FULL interview with the FCC commissioner, he simplifies it pretty well for a layman
if you just listen to out of context clips from left wing influencers, you will not be able to understand the situation
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uTyX9JC-rhA

>>516705940
That private company was coerced by the government.

>>516712857
These private companies have always had to follow regulations
If anything, the government was being nice by notifying them that they were breaking regulations or getting close to breaking regulations instead of just immediately fining them or revoking their licenses

>>516711980
Not even the government can definitively tie him to leftist extremism and the fact that the FBI had to fake that exchange to fit their narrative says it all.

>>516705631 (OP)
I think that Charlie Kirk getting killed by a furfag mad about his criticism of troons was hilarious and that anyone who thinks it's sad is an NPC. Realizing that celebrities don't deserve sympathy and that their suffering is always hilarious is when you leave the cave and enter into the light. That's why the Ukrainian woman dying was sad and Kirk getting killed was hilarious. Imagine how funny it was when Rock Hudson got aids and died?

>>516711546
>Jimmy kept perpetuating hoaxes
Who is perpetuating hoaxes other than the president and MAGAtards? Remember when the bullets apparently had a trans symbol on them? Remember when Kash Patel said they had the suspect in custody, then an hour later he said oops we fucked up, and when congress questioned him on it he said "Nooooo I didn't say suspect, I said "subject"!!!".
On another note, remember when the Pedo in Chief was promoting fucking hydroxychloroquine to stop COVID?

>>516711697
They threatened to. That's unlawful government overreach.

>>516711786
Like what?

>>516711951
Kimmel didn't say it was a "MAGA person". This person doesn't know what they are talking about. Kimmel said that MAGA was trying to characterize the shooter as anything other than "one of them", which is true, even in this X post's own "analysis" it admits that
>At the time, early reports indicated Robinson's leftist leanings
All of which were taken from word of mouth from Kash Patel without any evidence. They still don't have enough evidence to claim he's a leftist. Early reports also thought the shooter was a bald Jewish man.

>>516713058
He killed Charlie Kirk, the only ones who would do that are a deranged s o y brained libtard leftist, or glowniggers, no exceptions. His friends and family also described him as being leftist to boot.

>>516711980
>and a deflection from the fact it was obvious it was a leftist freak from the moment Kirk got shit
Not it absolutely isn't "obvious" at all.
75% of political violence is committed by the right and the right wing is splintered across numerous factions.
I'd expect a /pol/ idiot like you to assume its a leftist, but I wouldn't expect the fucking director of the FBI and the President to make a statement assuming it before they even caught the fucking perp. When Fox news is trying to tard wrangle the president, we've got a problem.

>>516712489
>You cannot mislead the viewers using public airwaves.
How was Kimmel misleading anyone?
>We do. The FBI released what they had on last Saturday or Sunday.
What evidence points to him being a leftist?

>>516706254
>The FCC threatened Disney. The government is getting involved.
Jimmy Kimmel violated FCC rules. You can't spread lies (Kirk's assassin was MAGA) in the wake of a crime/tragedy.

>>516711980
how about we just agree to disagree?

i can't really understand why people hate the series, and i mean hate it in a negative way.

i can see why it may not be everyone's cup of tea, but that's just how a game is.

The reason Kimmel got canned is that he knowingly pushed a false narrative about the assassin's motives only to sow more political discord at a critical time, which according to the FCC's rules is literally a violation of regulations.

But also imagine if some popular left wing commentator got shot while debating right wingers at church. Now imagine if the shooter was a christian fundamentalist who lives with a racist white woman. On the bullets are the phrases DIE COMMIE and Hitler speech excertps. And then imagine if the media started talking about how he must've been secretly a left winger, and famous right wing pundits on national TV saying "wow look at all the stupid left wing groups doing their best to avoid admitting he was one of them, not taking responsibility!!" even though they KNOW the circumstances of the shooting?

Don't you think that would be insanely retarded? The entire left wing media sphere would move heaven and earth to ensure these right wing pundits get fired for deliberately lying just to stoke further political division.

Well that's what's happening and that's what Kimmel did, just reverse the political orientation.

>>516705631 (OP)
this comic is so funny to me cause some leftist fag made it to justify conservatives being silenced and now it's being reposted endlessly to justify people the artist undoubtedly feels did nothing wrong being silenced in the exact same way. we told those stupid clowns they were gonna have the same shit happen to them if they let this stuff slide and now it is. I have no sympathy for the left. they can die in the hole they dug and I"ll gladly laugh at them for it.

>>516706254
Oh? Did he violate FCC protocols? Huh. Sounds like he's a criminal, then.

>>516713302
>You can't spread lies (Kirk's assassin was MAGA) in the wake of a crime/tragedy.
But it's fine for the president to assume that the shooter was "radical far left" before they even caught the suspect?

The FCC can't just threaten people for violating the FCC's rules, that's tyranny.

>>516713199
Sounds like you just can't handle that you guys aren't allowed to break the rules anymore.
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences, shitlib! :D

>>516713277
>He killed Charlie Kirk, the only ones who would do that are a deranged s o y brained libtard leftist, or glowniggers, no exceptions.
That's what you said about the Butler shooter and look how that turned out.

>>516705631 (OP)

the same way I respond when I hear the truth being spoken so bluntly.

>>516713467
its the fact that jimmy is doing so on a show aired by licensed stations with a regulatory duty to serve the public interest and not distort the news and spread misinformation. the stations realized that by continuing to air jimmy's show they could get fined or lose their licenses for showing a pattern of intentionally airing misinformation, so they decided to stop airing the kimmel show
abc produces the show and decided to let jimmy go because nobody would pay to air his show
its complicated but what happened was 100 percent reasonable and constitutional. Jimmy dug the hole himself

>>516713298
Leftoids are the only ones deranged and sociopathic enough to kill a milquetoast political speaker like that, don't be retarded. Who gives a shit about the right being splintered into numerous factions? Nobody on the right would assassinate a normal ass family man like that. Kirk is near the bottom of the list of individuals any potential right-winger would go after.

It was obviously a leftoid from the moment Kirk got assassinated, saying anything else except maybe it being a glownigger op, is extreme cope.

>>516713679
>That's what you said about the Butler shooter and look how that turned out.
You mean the leftist shooter Thomas Crooks?

>>516714006
The right wing shooter who was confirmed by all family and associates that he was openly conservative. Kimmel was right, whenever political violence happens, you conniving rats will invent new realities to pretend he wasn't one of you.

>>516714261
you sound vaccinated

>>516714261
Yet he worked for Act Blue. Curious!

>>516714261
Leftist projection as always. He donated to act blue and got brainwashed into becoming a leftist extremist.

>>516714350
>>516714397
>On January 20, 2021, when Crooks was 17, he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic Party donation platform ActBlue.[13][50][19][51] His donation was made on the same day that President Biden was sworn into office.[12] According to the Progressive Turnout Project, he made the donation in response to an email about "tuning into" the inauguration. He unsubscribed from the group's mailing list in 2022.[52][49]

Crooks had been registered to vote since September 2021, when he turned 18.[3] He registered as a Republican,[3][4][50][53] and he voted only once (in the 2022 midterm elections).
Get fucked by the truth.

>>516713441
>appeal to authority fallacy
He didn't violate anything. It's government overreach.

>>516713588
>Sounds like you just can't handle that you guys aren't allowed to break the rules anymore.
LOL this is why nobody takes rightoids seriously.
How can you seriously compare companies not wanting to be associated with racists to the government threatening those same companies with deplatforming?
The government didn't create cancel culture, companies did. Companies are free to fire people over speech but governments aren't allowed to pressure companies into doing so.

>>516713819
>its the fact that jimmy is doing so on a show aired by licensed stations with a regulatory duty to serve the public interest and not distort the news and spread misinformatioN
Didn't stop Fox News from reporting that it was "trans markings" on bullets LMFAO.
>stations realized that by continuing to air jimmy's show they could get fined or lose their licenses for showing a pattern of intentionally airing misinformation
None of what Kimmel said was misinfo.
Kimmel said that MAGA was trying to shift the blame, and they were. This is verifiable.

>>516713852
>Leftoids are the only ones deranged and sociopathic enough to kill a milquetoast political speaker like that, don't be retarded.
LMFAO
>Attempted assassination of Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg
Right winger.
>Assassination of Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband; shooting of Sen. John Hoffman and his wife
Right winger.
>Arson attack on Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence
Right winger.
>Hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, husband of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Right winger.

>B-B-BUT IT WAS THE RADICAL LEFT!!!!1

>>516714662
You're right, a MAGA right winger is the only person who would try to kill Trump, it's just so obvious

all these killers are patsies

>>516714783
Not my fault your party appeals to deranged incels looking for school shooter notoriety.

>>516714877
I'm a registered Democrat, sweety, that means I'm a leftist.

>>516714750
>mass replying
I think you need to step away from the keyboard and take a breath lmao

>>516714662
>Voted once in the Republican midterms to try and sway the vote away from what he likely considers fascists
H-he's totally not a leftist though eventhough he donated money to the left!

>>516713199
>Kimmel didn't say it was a "MAGA person". This person doesn't know what they are talking about. Kimmel said that MAGA was trying to characterize the shooter as anything other than "one of them", which is true, even in this X post's own "analysis" it admits that
>>At the time, early reports indicated Robinson's leftist leanings
>All of which were taken from word of mouth from Kash Patel without any evidence. They still don't have enough evidence to claim he's a leftist. Early reports also thought the shooter was a bald Jewish man.
You can't read. I hope you're not a native speaker. Maybe the American edumacayshun system is even worse than I thought. Kimmel was reporting falsehoods as if they were true, in regards to a disaster, which is against FCC regulations.
>They still don't have enough evidence to claim he's a leftist.
You're retarded. The shooter etched far left antifascist messages into his bullet casings, such as "catch this fascist" and references to the antifa theme song.

You could argue that the FBI is not a trustworthy organization and should not be taken into consideration for legal matters (in such a case you would also basically hhve to argue for the abolition of the FBI). Also, again, you could argue that FCC regulations are unconstitutional. But you're not doing either of those. You are just posting utterly retarded bullshit. You are stupid and you can't read, you keep regurgitating lies you have internalized, you are not capable of criticsl thinking

>Like what?
FDR revoked radio licenses of political enemies.

>>516706254
he lied on tv, that’s illegal. the government also gets involved if you steal, unless you’re a nigger

>>516714750
>Attempted assassination of Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg
Left-winger. He literally advocated for muh racial injustice and wanted gun control lmao
>Arson attack on Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence
Leftist. He attacked because of the genocide in Gaza and wanted Shapiro to "feel the fear he put Gazans through"
>Hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, husband of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
>Assassination of Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband; shooting of Sen. John Hoffman and his wife
Right-wingers

Not making the case better for leftoids not being brainwashed NPC's kek.

>>516713199
>Kimmel said that...
These are good points anon. I haven't really cared that much, so I never bothered to look up what he actually said. I just assumed it was something like, "this shooter was a Trump supporter actually". He said nothing of the sort.

> "The MAGA Gang (is) desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said in his Monday monologue. “In between the finger-pointing, there was grieving."

We're living in a crazy age where our media companies are so afraid that the government will go after them that they'll bend to the slightest bit of government pressure. Meanwhile, there are Alex Jones fans itt who think it was a great crime that his show was taken off air.

>>516705850
Do frogs normally stand up on their 2 legs?

>>516710419
His show is entertainment, like Fox News. He can offer his opinion

>>516714750
Awww. He's upset!
>>516714662
Registered as a Republican, but donates to Democrats. Maybe he was retarded like you?

>>516716099
Does a bear shit in the woods and wipe his ass with a fluffy white rabbit?

>>516715633
Lying on TV isn't illegal kek

>>516716202
Its a distortion and bordering on illegal misinformation to call Kimmel's show "entertainment" lol

>>516707668
That was the point of the original XKCD comic, to smugly proclaim why certain speech should not be treated the same as others. The author didn't expect it would be used against them.

>>516708725
The FCC existing at all is a blatant violation of not just the first amendment, but also requires an absurd interpretation of the commerce clause to even pretend the federal government has the power to control the airwaves.

>>516715955
They keep bringing up the Paul Pelosi thing and it's funny as fuck because Paul Pelosi is a member of the landlord class, and thus their defense of him makes them class traitors. All the more reason to accept the fact that these people don't think. They just act.
Also Hortman was killed after voting against the Democrats. Interesting, eh?
>>516714877
At least a deranged school shooting incel knows that men cannot get pregnant, and are able to figure out the correct bathroom to use. :)

>>516708530
Every president has blatantly violated the constitution aside from Harrison.
>>516708603
The constitution doesn't give the federal government the power to issue the licenses in the first place, so revoking them is doubly unconstitutional.

It's nice seeing the left choke on their own style of disingenuous arguing.
Nobody is going to carry water for Jimmy Kimmel, get over it. You aren't going to win anything on that front.

>>516716847
okay well maybe you shpuld ask your democrat politicians to make abolishing the FCC a part of their party platform

>>516705631 (OP)
He’s right, it also doesn’t shield you from bullets.

>>516713298
>What evidence points to him being a leftist?
The choice of target, antifa slogans and lgbt+ memes on casings etc. There wasn't any evidence to the contrary.
>>516713467
That's what all the evidence pointed to, and it was correct.

>>516717016
Just keep showing them Kimmel doing blackface just to watch them squirm around an excuse for it.

>>516717028
I'm not a democrat. Democrats were the ones who created the FCC in the first place. Jimmy Kimmel deserved to have his show canceled, but that's because it was obviously unprofitable and apparently Disney was looking for an excuse to break contract with the unfunny retard anyway. He hasn't made a single human laugh since The Man Show.

>>516713199
>All of which were taken from word of mouth from Kash Patel without any evidence.
Law enforcement officers can, at press conferences, share evidence if it's in the public interest. The FBI director is accountable to the president who can fire him or congress if there's grounds for impeachment.

>>516705631 (OP)
The government also can't gangstalk you for what you say
But it does anyway

>>516717195
Is that a threat, terrorist?

>>516715955
Don't forget that the George Floyd chimpout lmao. There hasn't been political violence on that scale by the right in our lifetimes.

>>516717689
The right used to bomb abortion clinics and kill abortion doctors. That's about as spicy as the right has ever truly gotten in the US.

>>516705940
And what was the vile hate speech that he said exactly?
Please provide a quote.

>>516706254
Source?

>>516716202
While I agree it is highly entertaining seeing Kimmel shoah'd so quickly, there are no "entertainment" exemptions in those laws. You applied for the license, you abide by the terms.

>>516715313
>Kimmel was reporting falsehoods as if they were true, in regards to a disaster, which is against FCC regulations.
Can you actually quote what he said that was false?
>The shooter etched far left antifascist messages into his bullet casings, such as "catch this fascist" and references to the antifa theme song.
Directly underneath that, it had a fucking Helldivers 2 code and the "bella ciao" thing can literally mean anything because it was also in Far Cry 6. Both of these are video game related.
Also both of which weren't even fired at Charlie Kirk, and "if you are reading this you're gay lmao" doesn't even sound leftist.
The guy was clearly just an edgy web-addicted zoomer.
>You could argue that the FBI is not a trustworthy organization and should not be taken into consideration for legal matters (in such a case you would also basically hhve to argue for the abolition of the FBI)
I'm not arguing for the abolition of the FBI, I'm arguing for the jeet in charge to do his fucking job and stop treating his investigations like his own personal blog.
>FDR revoked radio licenses of political enemies.
No he didn't. The NAB revised its own code to push the Fairness Doctrine.
They only thing FDR censored was information about sensitive wartime intel coming in and out of the US, things like Canadian troop placements.

>>516715633
>he lied on tv, that’s illegal
Then why isn't Trump in prison?
And you still haven't shown me where he lied.

>>516715955
>He literally advocated for muh racial injustice and wanted gun control lmao
He's literally an antisemitic racist.
>He attacked because of the genocide in Gaza and wanted Shapiro to "feel the fear he put Gazans through"
He was antisemitic and anti-democrat.
Very left-wing, right?

>>516717200
>That's what all the evidence pointed to, and it was correct.
They didn't have enough evidence at that point to make a statement about it.

>>516717253
>Law enforcement officers can, at press conferences, share evidence if it's in the public interest
Kash Patel isn't sharing evidence though, he's claiming things without actually giving us the evidence. When Kimmel made that statement, we didn't have the note transcript and we didn't have the messages. There's still plenty of evidence they haven't released.
Public interest also means defending the suspect's right to a fair trial and that means presenting unbiased and fair coverage. Evidence must be evaluated and coherently delivered to make a case.
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-6/right-to-a-public-trial-doctrine-and-practice#:~:text=Rather%2C%20it%20is%20the%20accused's,priorities%20in%20resolving%20these%20conflicts.
>The Sixth Amendment right to a public trial and the First Amendment right to public access both presume that opening criminal proceedings helps ensure their fairness, but there are circumstances in which an accused might consider openness and its attendant publicity to be unfairly prejudicial. In this regard, the Sixth Amendment right of an accused to a public trial does not carry with it a right to a private trial. Rather, it is the accused's broader right to a fair trial and the government's interest in orderly judicial administration that are weighed in the balance against the public's First Amendment right to access.
Presenting the shooter as a "left wing antifa" nutjob before we even have any reasonable assumption that he is antifa is unlawful.