>>518554622
>A politician can be well-respected by society even if his fellow politicians disagree with him - just like someone can be a well-respected academic mind even if their fellow academics disagree with them.
But that's not how academia works. You see, Sepeher, who claims to be an academic, has NO work in the academic field. His only published work are his youtube videos and his books, which are published by his OWN publication company.
In academia, you present an argument, a basis for your argument, and the evidence used to arrive at your argument. Your argument is then either rejected or co-signed by your peers.
Sepeher has not published anything that meets this criteria. His work is not scientific. Academics don't just "disagree" with his work, they don't see it as real work, because it isn't based on facts.
>You still haven't expanded on your attacks against his personality
I made assumptions about his personality because it's fun and easy to assume that con artists like him are mentally ill. Maybe I'm right about these, maybe I'm wrong. Who cares.
>government scientists disagree with him.
Again they don't disagree with him, they don't see his work as legitimate or deserving of actual analysis because it's not based on fact.
Also most scientists don't work for the government and are just smart, normal people who understand why we have rules for science.
You, on the other hand, you are not in science and you don't understand why we have these rules because of pure ignorance.