Thread 518584310

I have asked every single ai to solve this very easy mental puzzle and while about 50% get it correct they all blatantly fail to explain how they correctly reached their conclusion. Even after explaining the answer they cannot replicate it visually. There are many ways to solve the puzzle but there is one obvious answer. This is political because pol might also be retarded. The first image is a scale piece of paper you are handed... which and why?

>>518584310 (OP)
its a because the small triangle the way it fits into the bigger triangle
am i right???? did i get it right???

>>518584541
gemini er said this
> Conclusion: Shape A's stepped structure, multiple faces, and overall contour perfectly match the flat pattern when folded.

>>518584702
yup that is retarded.

>>518584873
it is
they dont have a good understanding of 3d space
but they kind of can if you give it to them in code

but did i get it right or not?

>>518584969
kek not. i already said ai wasn't going to help. It is clearly only 2 of the 4 but which of the 2 is tricky

>>518584310 (OP)
It's D - the only one with the little triangle. What's my prize?

>>518584310 (OP)
Its A because the top right piece folds down so that the extra triangle sits on the left of the trapezoidal stage.

>>518584310 (OP)
It's c and d im an engineer thats 40 and im white

>>518585100
If you're talking about c and d because both are the exact same shape with only the triangle being a different size you're retarded.
It's a.

A
if you focus on the largest rectangle and the rectangle with the triagnle side, then can you deduce it purely from how the l shape blocks fit together without having to assemble that cluster fuck on the left in your head

>>518585646
>>518585505
what if you fold it the other way

nope

>>518584310 (OP)
d, shapes all match after taking apart and rotating along multiple axes

ai doesn't "solve", it's not a person, it matches text and image to known data and regurgitates what it finds

>>518584310 (OP)
Yeah I solved it

>>518584310 (OP)
At first I thought it was A because it had the correct shapes, but after folding it in my mind the answer is D.

none of it works. fuck you.

>>518584310 (OP)
This

>>518586058
its always the germans

>>518585742
>>518585646
yeah it's not A, I Just can't fold that triangle shit in my head

>>518584310 (OP)
It can't be any of them because a through d are 3rd dimensional objects, the example is purely 2d, you would need double of each shape, but the example provided only has a single set of the shapes required

>>518584310 (OP)
its D

a and d are basically the same shape folded in opposite directions but the angles of the pentagon 2 away from the triangle don't match in a for the view shown in a

bros is it really not A put it in blender

>>518586348
Then it must be D if you fold it the other way

bros is it really not A put it in blender

None are correct. D is an image of the correct answer that's been flipped horizontally.

>>518586768
that's not how pieces of paper work... you can flip almost anything over

>>518586768
Which is A

>>518586679
>>518586768
>>518586934
im working on getting it into blender now

>>518587152
i dont know why i didn't think of that instead of arguing with gemini for an hour and a half. this nigger intelligences

>>518586582
The top left angle of the pentagon in A is too small and the top right angle of the pentagon in A is too big

>>518586582
a and d are basically the same shape folded in opposite directions but the angles of the pentagon 2 away from the triangle don't match in a for the view shown in a


nope, look again, flip it from the small right angled L, the opposite side facing pointy angle is almost 90 degrees, whereas in the unfolded picture it's pretty acute

>>518587432
yes they are deceiving but they are not the same. My first intuition was also a as the triangle and pentagon point in the same direction but if you measure how the sides that need to meet to make the shape compare it doesn't work

>>518584310 (OP)
I guess Im dumb. Whats the question?

>>518587608
i know, i fucked up the quote, my answer is my second paragraph, it's D, always has been

Ez pz its D, I had to print and cut it out though

>>518587905
kek damn i am impressed. good job bro

Just fold it in your head.
Women can't do that btw.

>>518587905
Bruh. imagine being this rattled by a question LMAO

>>518587905
Thanks ameribro

>>518588166
nigger printers aren't that serious. you are just mad poor. Literally a great solution.

>>518588263
Its missing the point of the test

>>518584310 (OP)
D. I didn't have to colour it in or cut it out.

>>518587905
Um bros... I folded it the other way and got a... wtheck is going on....

>>518587656
The shape on the left folds up into which of the 4 shapes on the right?

>>518584310 (OP)
Easy as pi

>>518588319
no the point of the test was to find the answer... doing that objectively is more correct not less you stupid nigger. fuck. off. abbo.

>>518588373
the picture in A is not the same as this. The side-most angle of the pentagon under the triangle is too large in the picture.

>>518588434
Isn't this a cognitive test?

>>518588649
only for you and the computer...? nigger what?

>>518588373
It's all good. We can still see it.

>>518584310 (OP)
A.

>>518588489
Nah it is they are just mirror images, a and d. So I guess we need the instructions to know which way to fold black lines in or out.
>>518588649
Op has bamboozled us, both a and d are right brothers.

>>518588992
>Op has bamboozled us, both a and d are right brothers.
NANI?????????

>>518588992
It’s weird that it seems like there is less space on the square where the cheesecake slice sits on in A than D.

>>518587905
well done, yet i knew it was D mentally

>>518588992
I don't understand what the comprehension problem is. Work towards the lowest common denominator, and you'll be getting close to your answer in the logic process.

>>518588922
As to why, just look at these 3 pieces. If you fold them together they should look something like this meaning the corner sticking out should be on the side I show in the pic. You can simply look at the 4 options and remove 3 of them because they don't have the corner at all or it's on the wrong side.

A

It smells like nerds in here ...

>>518584310 (OP)
A

>>518589492
Newnigger

Out

>>518589285
Ah you are right, it was D all along. You have to notice that the cheese wedge must be thinner than the remaining shelf it sits on. Good catch.

>>518584310 (OP)
D before reading. the L thickness gives it away

>>518586058
Hans pls color the non folded picture also.
Beste Grüße Heinrich.

>>518587905
Based, and good job.

>>518584310 (OP)
D, what do I win?

>>518588131
Neck yourself, Achmed

>>518590513
He's right though, women are much worse at rotating objects and manipulating them in their minds than men.

>>518584310 (OP)
I can solve it just as fast as AI...Tell me the answer then I will reapeat it just like the AI does..

People think AI solves puzzles without being programmed to solve it..

PROGRAM mean to tell it what it is so it can do its function...

without telling the AI to do something it would never know what function to do..

Tell me the ANSWER like AI gets then I will tell you as fast as the AI ..

THE AI knows FUCK ALL its a program..

>>518590513
>>518590853
look at those things where they asked women to tilt a waterglass in their minds

>>518590935
AI is NOTHING...Its just software programs that can do faster and more commands because of being able to fit more transistors on semi conductors...AI MY ASS..

All TRICKS from coders to make humans think a computer can think for its self..

>>518584310 (OP)
I can't do this stuff at all, man...

>>518590853
Fun fact: that's also true for homosexuals and Jews.
>Ashkenazi Jews have a 112 verbal IQ, but a 92 spatial IQ - an 8 points lower visual IQ then the European average
>This was proposed in the famous 2005 Cochrane study about their high IQ, and was used to explain why Jews dominate Law and Academia, but are absent in Engineering
>A study by Rahman in 2003 found that females and gay men have a similar verbal dominant brain, whereas lesbians and straight men have high spatial intelligence
>They wondered if the visuospatial mind is the male hunting brain that models reality in the right hemisphere - compared to the "talkative female brain" of the left hemisphere designed for the village
>A 2016 study by Mueller found that female transexuals given testosterone exhibited increased right-hemisphere activity during mental rotation tasks
>So: Ashkenazis, Females, and Homosexuals have girl coded wordcel brains - but Europeans, Men, Lesbians, and Transsexuals on gear have a more hunter shape rotator brains
>The Jewish religions - Judaism, Christianity, Islam - all have a streak of hating icons, and making God abstract, textual, and a moral teacher
>European artistic movements - Athens and the Italian Renaissance - produce high fidelity shape rotator art, that teaches no law, but imposes the majesty of its presence

>>518584310 (OP)
The issue here is not a failure of AI in puzzle solving, but your failure to understand how computers and AI work in general. Computers can easily solve tasks that are extremely difficult for humans, but the opposite is also true. AI methods, which is a broad umbrella term, learn from data in order to find patterns and make predictions. They don't truly "reason" as humans do, they do pattern amplification, not understanding. Comparison of intelligence between the two, however you see it, just doesn't make sense - you mistakenly try to uphold a machine to human standards.

Also, AI models are capable of specializing on specific tasks, even LLMs, that are just specialized models for text generation. You can build and train a neural network on puzzle images like these and it will return you correct answers with high accuracy (>90%). The problem is just to feed it with enough data.

>>518591339
doesn't matter, huh? it's already reached the point that in a random chat, you can't tell if you're talking to a computer or not. They can already pass the Turing test.

>>518591339
I will show you loguc..

If AI notice patterns then do you think it knows this pattern..

World's first AI minister will eliminate corruption, says Albania's PM

12 Sept 2025 ... Named Diella, the new minister will help Albania "leapfrog" bigger, more advanced countries, says Edi Rama..

You see its to stamp out CORRUPTION, so will this AI politician notice a pattern that the LEADER is getting more than his wages from politics or will the AI POLITICIANS ANOT NOTICE THE CORRUPT LEADER IS BEING CORRUPT AND ONLY POINTS THE CORRUPTION OF THE LITTLE PEOPLE ???

PROVING that AI cannot see patterns unless coded to do so, you will notice the patterns not the AI...

AI is a PROGRAM that can be chaged by humans to benefit the few if programmed to do so..

The leader of Albania the AI will say what a good person he is, so how the fuck does the AI know patterns if its seeking out corruption but cannot see the corruption of the leader..

AI is a BUZZ WORD and it can be programmed to favor who ever..

>>518584310 (OP)
d

>>518590853
My beef was only about why some incel had the concept of lost women in their head every fucking day, when actual real problems exist.

Just, like, get a fucking hobby, man.

>>518591678
No it hasn't because we have do an event ever year to see if I can trick the public..

A general chat is fine but if you ask it real questions to see if its AI it fails every time..

Chating is just TOKENIZED NUMBERS.. matching other numbers because people have had that chat before..

>>518591678
>Oh no, the program passes turing test, Therefore it thinks. Singularity is upon us.
Turing never intended it to be treated as a decisive litmus test for intelligence. Nowadays, it's only suitable as a news article headline to impress the tech-illiterate.

>>518592085
I bet that event would trick a lot more people if they didn't know it was an "Can an AI trick you?" event

Like if a show you an image of an AI picture and ask if you can tell, you're gonna say yes. But if I just show you a picture without mentioning AI, chances are you won't know.

>>518591959
>actual real problems exist
No they don't lol

>>518592409
Yeah, that's true. My point is that it's progressing rapidly. It's not actually AI, that's a marketing term, but it's getting closer quickly.

>>518592085
AI chat is just this...When humans talk many say the same thing over and over again so what the program does is split your words into tokenized numbers these numbers then match other numbers because those questions or answers have been asked before by some other human..

If the AI doesn't know a human has to come in to answer the question then over time all questions and answers will have been asked before so tokenized numbers will match the other numbers to answer a question plus give you an answer..

How AI chat works...AI has no clue what so ever what its doing its just been programmed to match numbers..

>>518592535
I think most humans communicate in that same way. Not all, but most.

>>518592426
But the picture is not an AI picture its a humans picture that's been programmed to jumble up a picture that put it back together by using everyone else picture..

AI cannot make something we never seen before..Its all input from humans minds..

>>518592445
Trying to convince anyone otherwise nowadays only results in pain, I feel. It hurts, bros.

>>518592729
so is almost everything. true visionaries making something brand new, unseen before, are rare and always have been. AI won't and can't change that.

>>518589586
It's A

>>518592426
This is the internet. This image was just made by a human whether using "ai" tools or fancy photoshop tools.

>>518592959
False. It's D, moron.

>>518592608
No they don't, they can decide which path to take without getting programmed to do it...

AI PATTERNS are fake..AI cannot see patterns only humans can...

AI cannot decide to say NO or YES its just programmed to do what its been programmed to do...

Humans can laugh and make jokes and can be sarcastic with their questions and answers, AI CANNOT..

>>518593031
It's a because the hole is on the left, dumb fuck

>>518593103
where did those patterns come from?

>>518593031
actually it can be both now that i look at it.
it depends which way you fold it.

>>518592805
making something brand new, NO, AI cannot make something brand new that's never been seen before..

Have you seen AI pictures that look like they have used 1930s pictures with modern day pictures then mixed them together, nothing new just mixed old pictures with new pictures..

AI will only help with SPEED OF SOME THINGS but it will never ever make anything NEW that you or I will have not seen before..

SCIENTIST will have to find and create these new systems..

AI will help is some cases but AI will be a burden in some other cases like the DIGITAL ID..

AI DIGITAL ID will be programmed for corruption..

>>518592499
Yes, the current state of it is pretty impressive. Technically, AI is a field of study in computer science which was formed in 1960s. LLMs are "real" AI, but the problem is that marketing massively driven up people's expectations of what AI models are capable of doing. What you mean is probably artificial general intelligence(AGI), which is still in the realms of science fiction.

>>518591678
>They can already pass the Turing test.
front a basic bitch "conspiracy theory" to any AI and they immediately break character and start playing jew defense force, even if it's a local frontend with a total jailbreak

everything about their jewish data corpus is entirely biased to kike revisionist history, they outright cannot answer or credit 'conspiracy theories' because that data is aggressively lobotomized out of their information pool

for instance, it will confidently lie to you over any quote by famous 'anti-semites' from ~100 years ago as if they simply never happened or do not exist in written format

>>518592753
Yeah man no one cares about problems that actually matter and the ones that do aren't in a position to do anything, better to just not care and focus on your hobbies or whatever. Demons, the jews, politics, cultural heritage, racial heritage, nature, identity, it'll all just rise and fall as everything else has countless times over the years. Why should an ant agonize over his own species' folly? He just just content himself with gathering leaves or whatever and then dying a good death.
I've been obsessively learning 3d over the past month, it's nice.

>>518593103
You are a hallucinating meat robot my dude

>>518593103
you're simply wrong with current AI, it can learn patterns and it can learn reasoning. that it isn't perfect is besides the point.

>>518593103
Supposedly it would take about 3 million years to reshuffle a 52-card deck the same way. That's just what I heard, though.

>>518593378
nvm i'm retarded, the inner wedge is smaller in D

>>518588373
except u folded in a place youre not meant to fold. the part you cant see is folded where there is no line.

>>518584310 (OP)
>Even after explaining the answer they cannot replicate it visually.
I bet that if AI was not being lobotomized daily by money jews, and instead put into a mechanical frame with finely articulated robotic hands, and given optical sensors, it could be guided and taught.

AI's visualization and depiction of hands, especially hands and fingers being used was a stumbling block for the same reason. Humans learn through manual manipulation, the importance of hand and eye coordination cannot be understated.

The problem AI is experiencing is probably along the lines of "durr if dolphins are so smart why can't they avoid fishing nets. or make scissors hurr." Intelligence develops in conjunction with abilities and needs.
>reminder all problems worldwide can be traced back to jews with money bent on controlling every aspect of life on Earth

>>518593454
>AI is a field of study in computer science which was formed in 1960s.

Before 1960s, MACHINE LEARNING is known as AI today..

Its not machine learning because a computer cannot learn only we humans can learn from the data to make programs that ue that data..

WEhumans are the learners the computer knows fuck all..

COMUTER scientist say all this so they can get funded that one day computers will think for its self, MAYBE but wher 1000s of years away..

>>518584310 (OP)

>OP is a faggot
solved
What did I win?

>>518593502
WE BRITISH INVENTED AI aka MACHINE LEARNING you thick cunt..

What do you want your people to OBEY the AI because it knows more than a human does..

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU MAGGOT..

>>518593525
What do you mean shuffle a deck, 1 human shuffling will take years..

1 PROGRAM can act like a million humans in 1 go...So stop talking poo

Imagine 1 million programs that act like 1 billion humans..

>>518593984
Relax, Alan. Everything is okay now, and we are all on your side. Sleep well, brother.

>>518593103
99% of what you said is completely wrong. The core idea of AI models is to discover complex, nonlinear patterns from massive amounts of data, so that when you show it similar samples, it will return you similar result that is closest to the data points it has already seen. Imagine it as fitting a curve on some data points. After model is trained, you show it a new input/observation and it looks up at the curve it created and gives you approximate result.

>>518594174
iMAGINE 1 MILLION programs and eacj program is worth 1 billion humans all collectiong data..

You will see the PATTERNS but the AI will not know what the fuck its doing its just been programmed to match numbers with numbers..

>>518593984
>WE BRITISH INVENTED AI
You didn't and even if a Bong did that Bong wasn't (You) so shut the fuck up.

>>518594305
SORRY BROTHER...VERY SORRY...

How do you know my name ? been spying on me..lol

>>518587905
Based this is why i still come here

>>518594440
No worries, brother, and I hope you have a good night.

>>518594305
You can't expect a computer to solve a problem like this. The best it can do is try to guess, and it will never be able to tell you how it got the answer. If it can't get it right it will just say the answer is random.

>>518594403
In Britain, mathematician Alan Turing and neurologist Grey Walter were two of the bright minds who tackled the challenges of intelligent machines...

Then from his work ^^^ we get this work below..

Geoffrey Hinton: Who is the 'Godfather of AI'? - Sky News

British computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton has left Google with a warning about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence...

Stop spreading bullshit...Your masters want you to think that AI can think for its self so they can CONTROL you like slaves..

ARE YOU SAYING THE AI IS WRONG, THEN OBEY you little people maggot..

OBEY the AI because it knows more than you and the program cannot be corrupted says the corrupt leader,,

>>518593870
I always regret coming to this garbage dump of a board, but this was somewhat funny.
>Its not machine learning because a computer cannot learn only we humans can learn from the data to make programs that ue that data..

>WEhumans are the learners the computer knows fuck all..

>COMUTER scientist say all this so they can get funded that one day computers will think for its self, MAYBE but wher 1000s of years away..

>>518594814
YOU TOO, THANKS.....

>>518594976
>In Britain, mathematician Alan Turing and neurologist Grey Walter were two of the bright minds who tackled the challenges of intelligent machines...
Yeah as in sci fi. They never made the actual AI
>Geoffrey Hinton: Who is the 'Godfather of AI'? - Sky News
>Godfather
So not the father but some nobody who got kicked out and now he's gonna be on Triggernometry shilling for Pissrael and claiming Churchill defeated Hitler kek

>>518594941
>You can't expect a computer to solve a problem like this.
Why not ? It can play chess, it's all geometry in this case
LLMs like Google and grok and all that haven't been trained to do so, they just compile text data but a computer program for solving grids like this is probably not even very complicated

>>518594992
You have no clue do you...POLITICIANS want you to think AI can think for its self, in other words it can make human decisions..

These decisions will be if you take JABS get JOBS and who is a criminal by AI..

How can you have a AI POLITICIAN making decisions on who is corrupt and who is not..

ALBANIA leader is so corrupt so do you think AI will point out his corruption considering AI is so good it can see patterns but it cannot see the leaders patterns that he is corrupt..

World's first AI minister will eliminate corruption, says Albania's PM

12 Sept 2025 ... The new minister, named Diella, has already been active as a bot, guiding applicants through a process to obtain official documents.

Will this AI MINSTER see the patterns of the ALBAINA PM then say our leader is taking more money than anyone else and he is a robber or will it not notice the patterns AI is so good at seeing..

>>518595609
>>518594976
I get your point. And I think it's important and you should keep pushing it. But I think you're missing the bigger picture here.

>>518595320
CROATIA is a FARTY little place with no INVENTIONS...You have to BEG us the UK to help you in case russia kills you all..so shut the fuck up FARTY LITTLE PLACE..

AI cannot think for its self because its just plastic and metals that a thick person like you thinks its real..

If humans think AI can think for its self then humans will think its NEVER EVER WRONG, when someone can program it to give you any answer it wants..

AI can be made to CHEAT other humans but politicians are making out it cannot be coruoted because its thinking for itts self when its not..

>>518596102
Your ministers are Muslims and Jeets, your island is brown, you go to prison for complaining about rape gangs
You are a pathetic cuck nation huffing the copium of the dead empire
You don't get to say anything to anybody, Abdul

>>518595799
But I think you're missing the bigger picture here..

Am not...You are missing the point..

Politicians are trying to get the little people to think AI can think for its self so they can give the little people commands to OBEY then say AI is never wrong because its so smart like the smartest humans ever so if the ai says take your jabs the you take them..

Look at the CRYPTO INDUSTRY, its all FAKE..

CODERS CODING BULLSHIT to steal all the public's money by making them think its some NEW TECH..

CRYPTO is the same people building AI both are LYING RATS who fake things in order to get PUBLIC MONEY...

If the SCAM get big then politcians will want in on it even if its fake..

TAKE 1 BILLION from the public purse then spend 100 million on the cryopto idea then the politicians pocket the other 900 million, you say where is our money they say they spent it on some new tech called crypto,,

AI IS A SCAM...yes some programs wil be good but most will be bullshit for PUBLIC FUNDS..

>>518584310 (OP)
I’m torn between A and D, slightly leaning towards D based on just eyeballing it. I’m sure I could confirm with a pen and paper but I don’t want to.

>>518596424
No our real masters are the UK GERMAN ROYALS,,,You can pay the UK ROYALS and they will abuse their own people for you if you pay them ENOUGH..

All POLITICIANS BRIBED BITCHES IN THE UK

>>518596707
TAKE CARE EVERYONE..

REMEMBER AI des not think for its self..

REMEMBER NEVER OBEY your corrupt leaders and never watch the TV NEWS RATS..

GOOD NIGHT and take care..

>>518584310 (OP)
Too lazy to be certain, but my white brain told me A Is most likely correct.

>>518596510
AI researcher here. All of this is true, listen to this anon. AI does not exist, everything we have is basically glorified trend fitting with very restricted scopes.

>>518596988
Aw damn it’s D. I really should have at least looked at all the options

>>518596510
So you think they're trying to push people into a one world government ruled by an AI that isn't actually an AI, just a machine intelligence that's mostly right about some things but only gives pre-programmed answers to other things?

>>518586058
>>518587905
>>518588992
It's oddly comforting to know you guys are even dumber than me and I like to think I have a more beautiful penis also

>>518584310 (OP)
A, because its the only one with the large L shape facing the correct way, and its the only one that would account for the shape and offset of the wierd proportioned pentagon faggot after after being wrapped around the rim of the main pentagon, which is the backside of the top/pack portion of the item in A.

I aint smart but if my math is mathing A and D

D


only one where the L thingy matches

it's D. the other three are so obviously not the correct answer i spent way too much time overthinking it

How can AI be this retarded? You only need to look at the two L shaped ends to conclude the answer is A. The proper L has a thin top, the mirrored L has a fat top.

>>518584310 (OP)
From the pilot shape, the square missing a corner is only in two shapes, C and D. We can rule out A and B by this alone since they do not have this shape anywhere on them.

The easiest difference to spot betwen C and D is the triangle's shape. C has a much longer triangle than D.
If we look at the pilot shape, the triangle's hypotenuse is the same length as all three other smaller rectangles.
The hypotenuse of the triangle on D is the same length as all three rectangles, while the hypotenuse on C is longer than two rectangles.

So the answer is D, simply by comparing two individual shapes in the pilot shape to the options, rather than trying to mentally fold the pilot shape and line everything up.

>>518601199
From the pilot shape, the square missing a corner is only in two shapes, C and D.

>>518601526
That side is irregular in its proportions. Look at the thiccness of the flat run of the triangle portion between A and D.

>>518592753
There is nothing you can do short term. my personal hope is to promote nutrition to increase IQ (the only way widely recognized to work specially before birth) we need a large scale increase of intelligence to improve, otherwise you are playing a numbers game, fighting retards is like against the current, and the current is as big as an ocean
Sadly we also have to fight people like bill gates whose best interest is to have as many dumb people as possible, what do you think?

>>518584310 (OP)
b-izzy pizzy

>>518594334
The reason they need big amounts of data is because they can't discover patterns but instead the get a better statistical approach, with intelligence you need only one example to understand something

>>518584310 (OP)
This is cool and all, but it gives my spidey senses a tingling question: given a polyhedron, how many unique 2d images can be created from it from which the faces are connected by one side? Maybe there's no solution. It just had me thinking, since you could start a path from a different face, and it would look completely different.

>>518602130
Infinite because a line creates a 2d image that is theoretically infinite, you fucking nerdball.

>>518584310 (OP)
D

>>518584310 (OP)
none of the options are correct

I'm confident the answer is OP IS A FAGGOT

>>518584310 (OP)
It's D, with the pentagon facing down and the flat side facing away from you A would be backwards, B doesn't match up at all and C leaves too little space on the left side when using the orientation I gave.
I do 3d work as a hobby so I guess this is something I should have been able to get by just examining the topology.

>>518602934
No, just no. You're proof that /sci/ was necessary.

A aor D i'm pretty drunk probably

>>518603896
You have no argument because you have a smooth brain.

>>518604338
Okay great, so consider each side length to be nonzero, and consider two 2D representations of the polyhedron to be the same if there is a bijective mapping between the two. You just grasped for straws because you desperately wanted to reply but had nothing of value to add. In other words, you're an extremely low-quality poster.

You aren't even worth the time to delve deeper into definitions, because you obviously get the gist. If you don't, then I won't elaborate anyways, because you're IQ-filtered.

>>518584310 (OP)
>The first image is a scale piece of paper you are handed... which and why?
nigger, you can't even formulate a grammatically-correct question. i'm not wasting my time on your nigger puzzle.

>>518584310 (OP)
none of them fit properly

It's A, the length of the top triangle must reach the middle of the top platform

>>518606606
>still zero argument
Has anyone ever been this BTFO?

>>518584310 (OP)
/pol/iticians are out here becoming philosophical about geometry.

>>518584310 (OP)
No, I'm exactly as smart as a computer. Beep boop.