>>518610571
And to be clear, I'm not completely against crypto. I'm against single points of failure. I try to get rid of all single points of failure. It makes like easier and safer. HOWEVER...(((they))) want a 1 world currency. One in which they control for total market manipulation. You can't do that with numerous forms of currency. I mean, you can. But it's way harder and requires entire nation control. Which they can't succeed in gaining.
2. Everyone keeps looking at block chain as if it's infallible. Every single transaction is both logged and traced. You can't do that with cash. Which is why they want to get rid of it. Wallets can EASILY be hacked. Ask North Korea. They stole billions in BTC. If you want to hack my real wallet, it's going to require a gun. Which, you ladies, aren't allowed to own to defend yourselves.
Crypto in itself, is total control. The idea of decentralization is a good idea. However, if you know anything about computers or networking...can NEVER be accomplished digitally. Ever.
It's best to go with PHYSICAL currency. Be it in gold, silver or other precious metals. In order to rob someone of that, you're going to need more than a laptop. And I have a chance to stop you.
I'm against central banking for the reasons that we see now. Accts frozen due to 'wrong think'. FEDs swooping in if they don't get their cut. Etc;
But crypto, is central banking...now centralized. There has to be another way. And I think that physical currency that actually has more value than 1's & 0's or the paper that I wipe my ass with...is the best option.