>>518618962
I deny outright that such a thing is the case, I think that YOU are mad that you lost, and are attempting to frame regular procedure as something sinister because you have no other venue to attempt to recover from those losses. You don't get to decide who is a pedo or whatever. You aren't smart, you aren't clairvoyant, you don't understand the law, you don't know or even care what you're asking for, you just want something, and you can't point to anything else.
Fortunately you have no authority with which to demand it, and now nobody cares because you guys lied for ten months about us going to war in Iran or whatever.
>>518619060
Pretending to be smug while you are actually seething impotently is not a good tactic, Anon, because it is too obvious. There is no war in Iran, and there will be none. I've been listening to you guys claim that you have some gnosis of the future's events for ten months, and you have been wrong EVERY time.