Thread 518632709

You can either have a high trust society with no jewish pornography or you can have your low trust society with porn and creepy AI cameras watching you take a shit while some scumbag nerdy fuck beats his meat to your hairy ass and cackles with glee like the death deserving bitch he is.

WOWIE WOWZERS /pol/BROS ITS ANOTHER INCELERINO THREAD

G
T
F
I
H


WOWIE WOWZERS /pol/BROS ITS ANOTHER INCELERINO THREAD

G
T
F
I
H

>>518632709 (OP)

It's unconstitutional. Dead in the water. Per state perhaps. But it won't get far. If he doesn't want porn get a blocker like everybody else. Otherwise fuck off. He's barking at the moon.

To reiterate it's dead in the water and unconstitutional it already had that debate earlier in the year

>>518633488

He's a woke radical puritan. They're even worse than the ADL. The ADL have been terrible with DEI and censorship. He's the next level of complete dystopia. Assholes every one of them.

>>518632709 (OP)
Obviously it won't touch anything owned by kikes.

>>518633803

No. He wants another censorship digital I.D safety act start up. It will be even worse than anything imagined. Imagine a porn prohibition? We are back in time to bygone days of the inquisition. It doesn't stop with porn. It stops at whatever tgat asshole dislikes. Practically what it is today with its lunatics cancelling everybody else and inserting dystopia on everything. Ban ban ban no no no. More bullshit than ever. It isn't better either. More pointless laws and cannot and taxes.

>>518632709 (OP)
>bans porn
Yes, but the people who make it keep making it. Why not kill them?

>>518634244
Why would digital I.Ds be necessary to ban porn? CP is banned well enough without digital I.Ds

>>518633488
>anybody in American government
>giving the first flying fuck about the constitution
>any of the fluoridated goy cattle
>lifting a finger to prevent it

>>518633722
>They're even worse than the ADL
Nothing is worse than the ADL (and it's attacked ethnic group), and porn isn't speech.

>>518635119
>attacked
attached*

>>518632709 (OP)
Cool it with the antisemitism

>>518632709 (OP)
Kek. Mutt porn bootleggers incoming.

I quit watching pron and mastubating so fuck it.
Delete it all.
I prone masturbated and have been cumming out of a limp penis after dry humping pillows to the point I can't even cum from normal sex.
Got a blowjob from my new girlfriend last night and I couldn't cum from it. Also it's pretty numb down there. Felt some pleasure but not as much as I should. I made her cum with my fingers because she still doesn't want to fuck. I need Viagra to fuck now and then I have to mouth breathe for 2 hours.
I wish I'd never had porn. Wish I'd jsut gotten laid in high school before my penis was too badly damaged. Now I'll probably never have normal orgasm and it fucking sucks.

>>518632709 (OP)
They have porn in Israel. If you set a VPN to Israel and go to any porn site, there are no niggers, there are no giant 10 inch cocks, there are no trannies, it's white people fucking their white wives with regular average dicks. The redpill of all redpills.

You think I’m going to talk to real women just because you ban porn? You think it will disappear? You think I won’t find it? I will fap to porn and you faggits can’t stop me!

>>518634970

I am expressing the levels of bullshit hitting civilisation today. Civilisation is advancing the wrong way. All because of its assholes are trying to gain from it.

There is far more dystopia now and pointless laws than when there was less crime in society a few decades before today's insanity. When people gained freedom.

Yes a lot of it is from it going online. It wants to control what people say and think while dishing them propaganda and advertising.

Your question. What is a digital I.D for it's a blueprint into your data, where you went and logged in at online, online becoming a transaction for all access, anything else is faster redundant, combined into everything else about you and any restrictions placed. Age, nationality, account, medical, education, background, crime, vote. Any access can be brought up on a gov database everytime you make a social media post and it finds your address immediately. They already do but not as easy as a click while they slap themselves silly at how much better they are, at this world they've created.

Digital I.D combines all that data and faster places restrictions. Any restrictions are becoming nonsense breached regardless, illegals and crime do not use or fake and scam, taxed even more, and exploited anyway.

What does a Digital I.D do, nothing on the offset everything else already does. A porn ban certainly is enforced by a digital I.D you'd need to log on with.

>>518635343
better give a grace period, and then just ban the distribution of it.

>>518634244
You lost, Trump won

>>518636211
Nice write-up about the surveillance hell.
>A porn ban certainly is enforced by a digital I.D you'd need to log on with.
I concur that this can be easily exploited by opportunists to implement such a system. However, if such a system wasn’t already in place — while it was still possible to ban certain media (e.g., CP) — I wouldn’t say a porn ban must necessarily come with a digital ID.

>>518632709 (OP)
Baby steps

>>518632709 (OP)
Seriously this needs to happen or else hoeflation will skyrocket and we will run out of rentable prostitutes; purchaseable and leasable prostutes will also probably continue to decline is supply as well.

Therefore in order to replenish the brothels and cathouses it is imperitive that we ban pornos for if we dont men will no longer be able to have sex with a woman but will instead pay a woman to look at while he nuts into his own sock.

>>518632709 (OP)
>fight this?
No. I support this.

If these assholes ban porn, I'm going to war. That's a step too far! Pronography is about artistic freedom, freedom of expression, entrepreneurship, and free enterprise. It is the essence of freedom! Only communist 3rd world shitholes and brown countries ruled by religious fanatics ban porn.

>nooooo, you can’t just touch your benis without the express consent of the federal government!
Glowniggers aren’t even trying to be subtle about their attempt to grab more power.

>>518632709 (OP)
It’s feminists who are the ones trying to ban porn.

I don’t know how the left is going to pass this when we control Congress

>>518637777
checked. the porn ban is just a Trojan Horse for biometric digital ID, the ending of internet anonymity, and strict control of financial transactions by way of programmable currency.

>>518637777
Checked

>>518633488
What does the constitution have to do with porn?

>>518636863

It prevents access was what I implied. So this topic bans porn and enforces it with a digital I.D. Digital I.D will be used for this. It's dystopia for no other reasoning except for combining data quicker for more or less gov and others to access. Not like they don't anyway. Except it puts it in the hands of real assholes. They have gotten so much dumber since having it.

For example police run a background on the person phoning in the crime instead of investigating the criminal.

Or you're discriminated against because of vote or circumstances. As is the case today with its labels.

Examples except much worse. They have gotten so dumb today. Digital I.D doesn't make them smart. Illegal don't use I.D. why does everybody using I.D need more I.D. discrimination and insult to their intelligence. Oh and that's a crime. Thinking.

Funny how many times christcucks and feminists need to start their sentences with
>ITS NOT VIOLATING YOUR 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO [CENSOR SOMETHING I PERSONALLY DONT LIKE AND DONT WANT YOU TO HAVE]

If you have to come out saying it's not a violation of your rights -- it's probably a violation of your rights.

>>518632709 (OP)
What we betting that it doesnt end up banning porn and instead does the age verification thing making life worse instead of better.

You better hope this really does actually ban porn because otherwise your internet will be ruined by even more spyware.

unironically what do american conservatives in 2025 think will happen if porn is banned? the birth rates are going to magically be fixed? porn won't be sold illegally or found for even freer than it already is? there's enough porn produced every year for numerous lifetimes of fapping and there's actual hoarders out there with hundreds of terrabytes of porn, not to mention compressed porn or just image sets
will women be less obnoxious now that porn being banned makes their vaginas even more important and that hookers are also outlawed?
just curious

>>518636863
It doesnt have to be implemented that way, however considering every other country is implementing this shit its worth being aware of the fact that digital id and age verification systems is actually worse than
A) Full on banning porn
B) Doing nothing about porn
C)Actively promoting porn more than it already is

The age verification stuff is worse than any of those options

Why is such filth legal in the first place? What the fuck.
.its not normal at all, if you think about it.
Like lets promote stuff thats considered obscene for thousands of years..

Almost like the devil used new age tools to push destruction. Hunanity should repent save grace

Im all for freedom but the patterns are strange..

Its just another weaponized anti white facet

>>518639859
>The age verification stuff is worse than any of those options
i agree.
And if the push comes to protecting children.
It would still be better to restrict computer/internet/smart phone use (at least without a guardian being present) for children than to implement the age verification.

>>518632709 (OP)

You can't legislate people into being moral.
All you do is drive the behavior underground.
You want people to be better?
Start by reforming the culture and they will follow suit.

>>518634244
>>518634970

It's not about battling porn; it's about setting the stage to require digital ID to even use electronic resources.
Haven't you wondered why Windoze requires a Microsoft account to even us it now or how Google requires a Gmail account to even access the Android store?
It's all hand-in-hand working to create the social credit-style Beast system, where everything you do relies on you bending the knee to the state, otherwise, you are cut off from your ability to participate in society.
Digital slavery, in other words.

>>518632709 (OP)
If republicans are smart, they'll gag anyone and everyone opening their yaps about bans. Mark my words, this is the EASIEST way to get democrats back into power.

>>518632709 (OP)
You can't just degrade a civilization and addict people to things like pornography, drugs, whatever and later just take those items away.
the people of this civilization have become accustomed to these things and to remove them would be catastrophic.
you have to figure out a way to ease people out of their addictions

>>518632709 (OP)
Retard. Banning porn is not going to magically result in kikes and niggers disappearing. It will result in kikes exercising more control over your life though, only under the mask of moralism.

>>518641133
>You can't just degrade a civilization and addict people to things like pornography, drugs, whatever and later just take those items away.
You can, actually.

>>518641330
and that would be destabilizing. what are you going to do with all the young men that were previously using porn as a surrogate for actual relationships.
many of them after a certain age are basically irrecoverable. they are no longer able to form real relationships with women. they are broken and you can't just except them not to be broken.
the people who rule are not capable of actually fixing the problem

>>518641330
If the goal is to make things even worse sure.

>>518641329

Coomercel detected

>>518632709 (OP)
Based
Nuke it all

>>518641724
Kike deflection attempt noted. The porn problem is not solved with kike controlled government boots on faces.

>>518633488
>the constitution
>the modern GOP
kek anon when do you think this is, 2002? the country is run by tiktok influencers with less legal knowledge than your grandma.

We all know this is going to be used to ban anime, waifus and anything that helps young males to cope, while women will still get handouts to be worse (politicians and Epstein tier criminals will still be off the hook, obviously)

Pornography in the grand scheme of vices is pretty harmless. The alternative of widespread prostitution presents a more serious public health, criminal, and sexual mores problem.

Trads as usual don't know things, think that everyone else is too stupid to see whether anyone else has tried this and how that worked, or think muh Jesus makes the obvious second order consequences go away.

I'm just going to buy a hustler from behind the counter for cash. Your fault if you need the titties shaking to blast rope.