>>518680645
Mostly correct information, HOWEVER:
>recursion goy
Not actually used in all languages so must be discarded as a metric. For example second level recursion is illegal in standard Pirahan grammar, so how can third-level recursion be used to measure intelligence of such people?
>time
This is another complicated issue. And the particular issue here is actually ADJECTIVES which only midwits will parse correctly in psychometric testing due to semantic bleaching. For example, an abacus is a form of laptop computer.
>mental model of another's state of mind
Not complicated at all, it's a threshold thing. Either you're up to the task or not. A good measure of at least one form of intelligence. And yes, if you struggle to understand other people's intentions and values it is pointless to care about their circumstances.